- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Goldman Responds To Court Block Of Trump Tariffs: Nothingburger, White House Can Sidestep
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:13 am to SDVTiger
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:13 am to SDVTiger
quote:
We have another dipshite "lawyer" on here. The Law offices of SFP, Billmatt and Boosie. Top lawyers that spend ALL day on tigrrdroppings
We can’t all be realtors like you :(
2
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:14 am to VoxDawg
quote:
lower courts can't issue nationwide injunctions like that
There's no option. The Constitution requires that "all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States” So if the tariffs are unlawful towards the Plaintiffs in these cases, then they aree unlawful to all.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:16 am to boosiebadazz
List all the ways realtors have impacted your daily life then list all the ways lawyers have impacted the healthcare system, and insurance industry then get back with me.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:18 am to Rip Torn
fricking sick of progressives telling people to follow the constitution. Seriously go frick yourselves.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:18 am to cadillacattack
quote:
It will be easily overturned on appeal
Please explain
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:20 am to boosiebadazz
Sorry that stung so much :)
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:22 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
And are wrong 99% of the time.
You seem to be a moron, but maybe I'm wrong in that assessment. Please demonstrate that I am wrong 99% of the time or admit that you are a liar.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:24 am to slackster
quote:
Correct me if I’m wrong please, but the across the board tariffs and the majority of Chinese, Canadian, and Mexican tariffs were not invoked under section 301.
The decision is only like 45 pages, a quick read. You can tell who in here hasn't read it.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:24 am to GetCocky11
quote:
Please explain
This should be fun...but I am guessing you'll only get crickets or insults.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:27 am to IvoryBillMatt
You and SFP were wrong about your defense of the maryland man
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:28 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
This should be fun...but I am guessing you'll only get crickets or insults.
That's fine, but a lot of posters here haven't even cited the correct law used by Trump to enact the tariffs that were blocked by this court. You don't even have to read all 45 pages, just read the first couple and the last page.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:31 am to Rip Torn
quote:
Whose job is it to determine what an emergency is, the President or the Judiciary?? It’s the President’s boy wonder
The opinion does not question the President's authority to declare an emergency, or even his authority to impose tariffs to address the emergency. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (another court most people on this board have never heard of) has always given POTUS broad deference to make those decisions.
The opinion says the fentanyl-related tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threat set forth in the Emergency Order. The Liberation Day tariffs exceed the limited authority granted by the Economic Emergency Powers Act.
This decision isn't a "nothingburger", but it is a roadblock. I'm not certain what the Federal Circuit will do. The Supreme Court is likely to uphold most of it, though.
But all Trump has to do is introduce legislation. He has both Houses of Congress. Introduce a bill that imposes tariffs, and also give POTUS authority to negotiate different rates based on defined conditions. Give Congress final approval. Constitutional issues would be eliminated.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:34 am to Rip Torn
quote:
Ivory has that unique combination of trying to appear non partisan while consistently siding with one particular persuasion while pretending to be the other in principle. It’s a trait that seems to be ingrained in law school
I'm very partisan in politics. Parties shouldn't matter in the law. I thought the J6 defendants were treated horribly not because I agreed with them politically (the 2020 election was stolen) but because they were abused in the way they were overcharged with Section 1521 violations.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:38 am to RohanGonzales
I once had a lawyer tell me that even when he’s on the shitter thinking about my case( any case) he bills out time. This was an accomplished tax attorney who was a named partner in a prestigious firm
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:38 am to GetCocky11
quote:
That's fine, but a lot of posters here haven't even cited the correct law used by Trump to enact the tariffs that were blocked by this court. You don't even have to read all 45 pages, just read the first couple and the last page.
Trust me, I know. Reading skills aren't highly valued by SDV, RipTorn, et al.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:41 am to LawTalkingGuy
Lol did you type that with a straight face
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:43 am to SDVTiger
quote:
You and SFP were wrong about your defense of the maryland man
How was I wrong? I said he was wrongfully deported to El Salvador because of the holding order, but that the Trump Administration had beaten the system by moving him outside the jurisdiction of US Courts. The Supreme Court, including all the Republicans, agreed with me 9-0. Abrego-Garcia will never be returned to the US, which is a good thing.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:44 am to LawTalkingGuy
Here’s a pretty good breakdown. The 10% sweeping tariff is likely over for good. A few will remain (tariffs tied to natl security interests for example) but the majority of them are likely doomed.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:45 am to Rip Torn
quote:
It’s funny how the “rule of law” only seems to apply to certain politicians. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison would be so proud!!
I know you're dim, but are you saying that Obama and Biden never lost lawsuits???
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:46 am to IvoryBillMatt
You pretend republicans are worse than democrats as you know and expect trash from them, but you trying to push the “ rule of law” bullshite is hilarious since democrats neither follow rules or laws. You are pushing a false narrative, IF YOU are a lawyer that’s probably normal for you but to think that judicial lawfare is going to stop this then dream on. Judiciary has no hand in foreign affairs
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News