- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Geraldo going off on Fox
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:56 am to longwayfromLA
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:56 am to longwayfromLA
quote:
His point is that they all know the fraud claims are nonsense
no one has evaluated the evidence
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:58 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
They were playing a dangerous game, and they knew it.
Now their blood is in the water. Let the frenzy commence. I’ll shed no tears.
Look at this mother fricker
I guess actually burning down shite and killing people all summer never was a "dangerous game".
frick you and all this melodramatic horse shite because our mighty rulers were inconvenienced.
You didn't give a shite when people lost their livelihoods when your allies burned their shite to the ground.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:58 am to tiger91
quote:
Isn’t it their job to represent the people and uphold the constitution?? Were they supposed to just ignore the evidence like judges and courts did
You know the answer already.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 7:59 am to tiger91
What is Fox?
Sorry cancelled cable over 4 years ago. Maybe you should consider stop bitching about it and stop paying for it.
Sorry cancelled cable over 4 years ago. Maybe you should consider stop bitching about it and stop paying for it.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:01 am to JudgeHolden
So... do you dems care about dead cops now? What about "fry em like bacon?" That's your mantra still, right?
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:03 am to TrueTiger
quote:
His point is that they all know the fraud claims are nonsense
no one has evaluated the evidence
This, this, this
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:08 am to TrueTiger
quote:
no one has evaluated the evidence
No one asked. You can't be mad that court didn't adjudicate in claims in your favor if you never make those claims in court.
“This is not a fraud case,”
Rudolph Giuliani
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:10 am to tiger91
quote:
But he’s screaming that Cruz and Hawley should never have brought objections to the votes.
So, as we've known forever now, Geraldo is a gigantic low IQ moron with a porn stache.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:11 am to tiger91
quote:
Isn’t it their job to represent the people and uphold the constitution??
Yes. And nothing in the Constitution says they had a valid argument because Congress is bound by law to accept ballots that are certified by electors appointed by state legislatures.
So what they really did was grandstand and waste everyone's time while whipping up a bunch of angry idiots. They knew after the safe harbor deadline that nothing was going to change the outcome of the election. They led people on for a month and wouldn't even stop after they tried to expedite after the attacks.
At the very least they're gonna get censured.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 8:13 am
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:11 am to AUCom96
quote:
Geraldo of the great Al Capone’s vault story? Who picked fights with skinheads for ratings on a tabloid show? Who had someone shoot off-camera to dramatize his phony war reports?
Also drew our battle plan in the sand before the invasion of Iraq. Peak stupidity there.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:11 am to JWeezy
quote:
I don't watch TV anymore, it's nice
Yep, I don't either. I don't watch news, or use twatter or facebook. I come to this site but that is about it.
I strongly recommend people stop watching the news, regardless of outlet. It isn't good for you and it is all lies anyway.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:24 am to tiger91
The guy was a cuck before Fox joined him.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:49 am to tiger91
Yeah, all of the "sensible" cucks are hating on Cruz now.
frick these people. They think we're going to just go back and settle for their typical do-nothing RINO frauds. We're not putting up with the same song and dance anymore.
frick these people. They think we're going to just go back and settle for their typical do-nothing RINO frauds. We're not putting up with the same song and dance anymore.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:51 am to tiger91
quote:Why did the Supreme Court and multiple republican appointed judges "just ignore" evidence?
ignore the evidence like judges and courts did??
Posted on 1/8/21 at 8:55 am to TrueTiger
quote:This is powerful
Scott Adams has the perfect response to Geraldo (YT link)
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:04 am to demtigers73
quote:FIFY, this is when the Dems had their objections. 2017 infamously began the Russiagate investigations.
just forgotten 2005 and 2017 happened?
Also funny that the protests and "seizing" the capital was a treasonous act attempting to disrupt constitutional proceedings, but the 2018 protests, sit-ins, occupation of the rotunda, and breaking into senate offices to disrupt the Kavanaugh appointment and proceedings was not?!
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:11 am to tiger91
quote:
But he’s screaming that Cruz and Hawley should never have brought objections to the votes.
In Hawley's case it was a money grab. He used his position as one of the last loyal holdouts to plead with voters to send him donations for his battle to save Trump. While the protesters were breaking down the doors to the legislative floor, Hawley had messages going out announcing that he was in there taking on the Democrats and saving America... and you can help by donating to my campaign.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:18 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Scott Adams has the perfect response to Geraldo (YT link)
His response is that they were right in breaking into the capital. That if the courts don't agree with you, your only relief is to take arms against the legislature.
Meanwhile, Dilbert is YouTubing safely from his kitchen.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:22 am to tiger91
quote:
Cruz and Hawley
Cruz runs for reelection in 2024 and I believe the same for Hawley. They should hope that the public will forget this over time. They should repent and go forward living a sacred life. Both are likely out of contention for a presidential candidacy. Cruz likely won't be reelected in the senate as Beto almost beat him last time. And Claire McCaskill remains active on social media and with anti republican rants. She will likely run against Hawley to get her old seat back.
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:22 am to tiger91
He's my senator. Not yours. He represents ME. As a constituent, I give him very high marks!

Back to top



2










