Started By
Message

re: Georgia Sixth Congressional District Special Election

Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:59 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69414 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:59 pm to
Why are results coming in so slow?
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
18581 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:59 pm to
Am I the only one who has a problem w/ a guy being able to run in a district they don't even live in; hell he can't even vote for himself
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22001 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

You are going to be so disappointed.


Why? I predicted it'd be Ossoff vs Handel in the run-off.

But considering 2 months ago nobody even considered he had a chance to make the run-off, that's hardly disappointing. And gives 2 more months to ramp up gotv efforts while Handel reminds everyone how useless she is.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Read my 1st post here on page 2 You can go ahead and chill out now, or you can


These are not early votes. This is in person voting. Ossoff is shattering Hillary's numbers
Posted by thomass
Member since Jan 2014
3526 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:00 pm to
Metro atl is always slow. Remember election night?
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Am I the only one who has a problem w/ a guy being able to run in a district they don't even live in; hell he can't even vote for himself


Well to be fair his mom's basement is still in the district.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22001 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Why are results coming in so slow?


Fulton isn't reporting at all yet, and the SoS site is buckling.

Also, our voting machine system is stupid and slow to report, especially in populated urban or semi-urban areas. We see it every election where Atlanta reports last.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:00 pm to
Ossoff worked for and advised a guy that thought Guam was capable of tipping over. Says all I need to know about him.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 7:25 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69414 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:00 pm to
BamaAtl, what % of the vote do you think ossof needs to get tonight for it to be considered "good" momentum going into the runoff?

45+?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69414 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

These are not early votes. This is in person voting. Ossoff is shattering Hillary's numbers
It's in-person early voting.
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

This dude looks like such a douchebag. How can someone vote for a democrat, supposedly running on Republican values, unless you're an old school democrat, but even then you should realize he's lying and he's a new style dem.




IDK, lots of Republicans just voted for a guy that espoused a lot of rhetoric that sounded pretty indistinguishable from a certain strain of leftist rhetoric: major government spending on infrastructure, UHC, protectionism both economically and militarily, and a willingness to protect gay rights.

If Trump and Bernie showed anything this election, its that a lot of the assumptions about what voters respond to, what they want, what they are willing to look past, and where their acceptance/aversion standards lie with candidates and positions, is not in the places we thought they were for some time.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22001 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

what % of the vote do you think ossof needs to get tonight for it to be considered "good" momentum going into the runoff?


>45%, with the total Democratic vote (or non-Republican) being >48%.

Once Republican voters aren't voting against Ossoff (every ad that wasn't pro-Ossoff was anti-Ossoff, almost none were pro-Republican Candidate X), turnout will drop on that side. Turnout shouldn't drop much at all for the Democrats, since they're already voting for Ossoff (and against Trump).
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22001 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

DK, lots of Republicans just voted for a guy that espoused a lot of rhetoric ...


...and also openly admitted to sexually assaulting women. Suddenly how a guy looks/sounds matters to the Christian Right?

Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Why are results coming in so slow?

I don't know the technical answer, but this is a state that took until almost midnight election night in November to finalize their counting.

Much later then other states with much closer voting and later poll closings.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69414 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:06 pm to
@katiefoody
quote:

(Not fun) #GA06 fact: Poll workers have to collect and drive memory cards from voting machines to county offices. Takes time.


wtf?
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20069 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:07 pm to
Counting slowed down by Feds snooping around the computertrons.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 7:09 pm
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22001 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

wtf?


I told you, our machines suck.
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
12990 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

These are not early votes. This is in person voting. Ossoff is shattering Hillary's numbers


Does this make up for November?
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

BamaAtl, what % of the vote do you think ossof needs to get tonight for it to be considered "good" momentum going into the runoff?

45+?




I think people should look at party turnout as the results come in.

In Kansas Democrats retained 70% of their numbers of the November election. Republicans only 38%.

If you are a Republican I would be crunching the numbers quickly once a few counties get in to see what that breakdown is. If the breakdown is similar to Kansas, there won't be a runoff.

If, however, Democratic turnout is not as great, or Republican turnout higher then usual, a runoff is all but guaranteed.

In that scenario, Republicans better not end up in a situation with a government shutdown, because shite like that is what I think can lead to Ossoff winning that runoff as congressional dysfunction will likely lead to Republican voter apathy.

This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 7:10 pm
Posted by mtheob17
Charleston, SC
Member since Sep 2009
5343 posts
Posted on 4/18/17 at 7:10 pm to
The strong GOP areas are north. I'm not in panic mode yet
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram