Started By
Message

re: General Kelly Blocking Trump from Information that will disprove Russian Hacking

Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:23 am to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:23 am to
quote:

For a person whose credibility is a result of releasing secrets, it's odd that he chose the shady Russian supporter to deliver secret information.
Why is that odd? Assange is a tool of the Kremlin. Wikileaks are a tool of the Kremlin. If you take half a minute to review whose secrets he leaks and when he leaks them, it'll be clear enough.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93337 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:32 am to
quote:

buckeye_vol


Nice melt down. Nothing you posted makes him shady. Stop trying so hard
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:36 am to
Back on topic, can't we agree that an openly and stridently pro-Russia shill like Rhorabacher isn't the most credible agent to levy charges of some anti-Trump government-wide conspiracy? Especially using an organization like Wikileaks, which Trump's own appointed officials have called "an arm of the Kremlin."
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37012 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Nice melt down. Nothing you posted makes him shady. Stop trying so hard
I have no doubt that there are professional alt-right or Russian posters on this board. SDVTiger excluded because none of his posts bring anything to the table of any value.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38640 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Why is that odd? Assange is a tool of the Kremlin. Wikileaks are a tool of the Kremlin. If you take half a minute to review whose secrets he leaks and when he leaks them, it'll be clear enough.


Even assuming that to be true, NT...who has done more damage to National unity as it relates to Constitutional governance...Obama/Hillary (Global Progressives) or V. Putin? Whose (anti-Constitution/traditional America) forces are in the streets now, backed by Academia, Deep State, MSM and the Dem Party?

It is a farce to believe that behind closed doors up there...they can win by playing within the 'rules'. And it is foolish to believe that the US can remain sovereign and exceptionally affluent to the degree that we formerly have...given high tech, Globalism and the *morality* of Egalitarian economic Ideology. This is a hot potato has to be dealt with...co-operatively...and behind closed doors as the Masses are too ill-informed, to incapable of being informed, and therein become too inflamed to carry on a productive and honest dialogue.

I think we are left herding cats.

Side note to Buckeye. Gained a lot of respect for you in this Thread. Brought the wood!

Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58483 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:44 am to
Yeah, we know Kelly won't let trump listen to infowars
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93337 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:44 am to
quote:

mmcgrath


You make a fool of yourself daily. Im just here to remind you
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Even assuming that to be true, NT...who has done more damage to National unity as it relates to Constitutional governance...Obama/Hillary (Global Progressives) or V. Putin? Whose (anti-Constitution/traditional America) forces are in the streets now, backed by Academia, Deep State, MSM and the Dem Party?

It is a farce to believe that behind closed doors up there...they can win by playing within the 'rules'. And it is foolish to believe that the US can remain sovereign and exceptionally affluent to the degree that we formerly have...given high tech, Globalism and the *morality* of Egalitarian economic Ideology. This is a hot potato has to be dealt with...co-operatively...and behind closed doors as the Masses are too ill-informed, to incapable of being informed, and therein become too inflamed to carry on a productive and honest dialogue.

I think we are left herding cats.

Side note to Buckeye. Gained a lot of respect for you in this Thread. Brought the wood!


Too much to unpack in one post, RCD, so I'll just address your first question. Any administration in this country can potentially do more damage than any foreign actor just by virtue of the fact that everything they do impacts the country. Their unwitting mistakes do not justify drawing some equivalence between incompetent governance and outright hostility to the United States--the kind of hostility adversaries like Russia bring to bear. Hell by your measure, Congress is more dangerous to the average American's wellbeing than ISIS and AQ combined. Are they enemies of the state?
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38640 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:30 am to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I have no doubt that there are professional alt-right or Russian posters on this board.


Name them.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162587 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:46 am to
what am I missing? I don't see in the article where Kelly blocked anything. we all know that Dana has this info and that he had a meeting with POTUS. So is the title misleading? Did Dana meet with POTUS?
This post was edited on 9/16/17 at 8:46 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162587 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:53 am to
quote:

I have no doubt that there are professional alt-right or Russian posters on this board.
My name is Natalia, my friend Boris will be along shortly. (Someone please register as Boris.)



Yet, you fail at logically discussing, the deep State, uniparty, Seth Rich or suspicious people around the Clinton's getting robbed with nothing missing, or two suicide taps to the back of the head. But you think Russian agents post here. Is the thread OP your alter?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162587 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 8:56 am to
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher still waiting to tell Trump what he learned at his meeting with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange - LA Times
LINK

I would think that the meeting would be a priority.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162587 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:00 am to
You and I have been through this before. WikiLeaks is not democrat hating only. They asked for Trumps Taxes. They are an equal opportunity whistle blower. So muchly so, that for awhile people wondered if the democrats took them over. And the GOP emails were leaked (I have posted the link to you before) they were boring so did not make the news.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162587 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:03 am to
Demonizing Rep. Dana Rohrabacher as nearly a KGB agent is weak. He has worked in Russian affairs, it is his niche. So when they paint him this way they got nothing else in defense, weak sauce huh?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37012 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:03 am to
quote:

what am I missing? I don't see in the article where Kelly blocked anything. we all know that Dana has this info and that he had a meeting with POTUS. So is the title misleading? Did Dana meet with POTUS?
I don't think so. Apparently he has to share his message with Kelly first.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

You and I have been through this before. WikiLeaks is not democrat hating only. They asked for Trumps Taxes. They are an equal opportunity whistle blower. So muchly so, that for awhile people wondered if the democrats took them over. And the GOP emails were leaked (I have posted the link to you before) they were boring so did not make the news.
Maybe you misunderstood me the first time, too. I said they're anti-American--not anti-Democratic party.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20361 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:18 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 10:44 pm
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

It's also quite possible that the Kremlin is passing damaging info via Assange. Assange has proven in the past that he will use information if it can be verified from wherever he can get it.
Assange has proven he'll use anti-US, UK, German, Australian, and olther NATO and allied info wherever he can get it. China, Russia--not so much. You may be able to find one-two instances for each over the last 10 years.

quote:

That doesn't in any way mean that the information isn't accurate
Not at issue. Not the point.

quote:

In fact if you accept that they are against his agenda it's exactly what you would expect them to do,
I don't. At least not in the way you suggest.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162587 posts
Posted on 9/16/17 at 9:25 am to
If the shoe was on the other foot. Tell the truth...If Assange had evidence that the political party you happen to despise (the party of Trump) set up your political party (democrats) in a false narrative of "Russian Collusion," wouldn't you agree that Assange should get immunity to share the information?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram