
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gas Prices average $3.68 under democrats and $3.32 under Republican Presidents
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:27 pm
My how the MSM (Lying Media) protects the dems and at all cost to your wallet.
Go ahead, elect a democrat!!

quote:
Although you’d never know it from the coverage, Barack Obama presided over stratospheric prices for the entirety of his two terms in office – when they averaged $4.32 a gallon. Democrats weren’t complaining, and the media treated it as an inevitability while Obama chanted that “you can’t drill your way to cheap gas.”
Go ahead, elect a democrat!!
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:28 pm to Timeoday
They’re staying home to protest high gas prices which will bring in higher gas prices. Just wait until Jeffries and Schumer get leader spots back and play sides with Iran to limit trumps power.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:29 pm to Timeoday
I wish I could pay more for gas
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:30 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
We have heard for months how we should now be excited to pay high prices for living essentials because it’s just differenT
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:32 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
I just paid $4.07/gl
Somewhat less than a few weeks back at $4.20/gl
Still, abt $2/gl to much, imo.
Imagine the prices if we didn’t decide to start a war
Somewhat less than a few weeks back at $4.20/gl
Still, abt $2/gl to much, imo.
Imagine the prices if we didn’t decide to start a war
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:33 pm to Timeoday
Temporary occupant of the White House is not what will determine gas prices in the future. What will is refinery capacity is not keeping pace population increases..
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:35 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
We have heard for months how we should now be excited to pay high prices for living essentials because it’s just differenT
No "we" have not. I think what "we" are explaining is that under Democrats, and under Biden, prices for everything were higher than they are currently, and Biden did not have to deal with the problem in Iran to blame it on. Prices under Democrats are unreasonably high by baked in Democrat policy. Prices, currently, are high because of Iran. Not because of a backward energy policy, mass illegal immigration, leftist corruption (DOGE has currently cut).
There is a difference. So it's nonsensical to "vote for Democrats" because of high prices because if a Democrat is elected, this is the norm, not the outlier.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:35 pm to Timeoday
Averages are one of the most misleading stats to ever exist.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:36 pm to Timeoday
You could take it a step further and say Gas was rising under Biden simultaneously while he was raiding the SPR on a monthly draw-down in a non wartime environment. However, not to be partisan on only pick on the Dems, what's happening now under Trump is not exactly a well oiled machine either, pardon the pun. He mucked this up pretty bad and will be lucky if only the House falls next month, and there's no end in sight to when the FOMC might actually loosen monetary supply. If Reagan was the bar Trump was trying to jump over, he has failed so far and is running out of attempts.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:36 pm to BugAC
He’s delusional. He’s just here to argue against maga since Trump is his president.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:37 pm to ljhog
quote:
Temporary occupant of the White House is not what will determine gas prices in the future. What will is refinery capacity is not keeping pace population increases..
Good point. Crude oil eased below the $89-per-barrel mark on Wednesday. It's not the price per barrel causing the high prices. Been much higher. Wonder why we haven't been upgrading and building new refineries.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:38 pm to MyMardiGrasHat
quote:
Imagine the prices if we didn’t decide to start a war
Panama Canal now under US control again.
Venezuela gives control to US of 68 billion barrels of oil.
Greenland is now controlled by US.
More oil is flowing through Strait of Trump now than before 02/01/2026
No one is crossing the US border with Mexico illegally
Now, imagine none of the above occurred. Would you still be complaining about gas prices only?
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:39 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Panama Canal now under US control again. Venezuela gives control to US of 68 billion barrels of oiiul. Greenland is now controlled by US. More oil is flowing through Strait of Trump now than before 02/01/2026 No one is crossing the border US border with Mexico illegally
Stay home patriots don’t vote and give it to the left - NIH
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:42 pm to MyMardiGrasHat
quote:
Imagine the prices if we didn’t decide to start a war
1) not a war, but that's beside the point.
2) Did you have information that no one else had? Because multiple intel agencies have reported that Iran was developing nukes. Is your position to just let them have them? Play that out and how does that look in the future. A nuclear armed Iran.
I mean, Trump could have done what every other POTUS did, and ignored them, and let them have nukes. At least gas would be cheaper right now and the Repubs would have a better shot at winning the midterms. But isn't that what we complain about with Washington pols? They care more about re-election than they do actually accomplishing things. Here, Trump accomplished something. But you'd rather him be concerned with re-election?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:45 pm to BugAC
quote:
not a war, but that's beside the point.
If it's not a war, why did Trump have to inform Congress of the 60 to 90 day war powers clock after the cease fire ended?
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:45 pm to BugAC
quote:
multiple intel agencies have reported that Iran was developing nukes.
Change the N to a Q and this all sounds vaguely familiar....
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:48 pm to Tomatocantender
quote:
If it's not a war, why did Trump have to inform Congress of the 60 to 90 day war powers clock after the stalemate ended?
Are there boots on the ground?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:49 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:
Change the N to a Q and this all sounds vaguely familiar....
Cool. Then please provide all of us with the secret intel that apparently you have, but no one else does, not even our intel agencies. Or do you think that Trump just decided to bomb Iran because it would be fun? What, in your mind, is the reasoning behind bombing specific targets in Iran if there were no nukes?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:51 pm to BugAC
quote:
Are there boots on the ground?
We're using "boots on the ground" to define a war versus the Constitution? This is technically and literally a declared war. Now figuratively, you can call it whatever you want I guess lol.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:56 pm to Tomatocantender
quote:
We're using "boots on the ground" to define a war versus the Constitution?
No, i prefer we just use the constitution. You may want to educate yourself better.
quote:
It is a war in the sense that matters for the laws of armed conflict, and it is not a formally declared war under the U.S. Constitution.
quote:
International law. Under Common Article 2 of the Geneva Conventions, an international armed conflict exists when there is armed force between states. Legal analysts at Just Security concluded that after February 28 the United States, Israel, and Iran were “unequivocally” in an international armed conflict, and that the law of armed conflict applies whether or not political leaders use the word “war.”
quote:
U.S. domestic law. Congress has not declared war. The last formal U.S. declarations were in World War II. There is also no Iran-specific Authorization for Use of Military Force. The administration has relied on the president’s claimed Article II authority as commander in chief and has filed War Powers Resolution notifications
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 12:56 pm

Popular
Back to top


9











