re: Full breakdown of the new January 6th report

quote:

---

Emotional-irrational MAGA types who had both of those aspects of their mental state manipulated by people who promoted a dishonest theory about the ability to stop the certification of the 2020 election. These emotional irrational types were whipped into a frenzy and acted in kind

---

In other words, you're a lemming, which is surprising.

quote:

---

In other words, you're a lemming,

---

How?

As even the people who support the insanity of that mob try to do it by claiming it was agent provocateurs that caused their insanity, right?

The only variable change that we are discussing is who riled up the mob. The 26 FBI informants or the hundreds of organizers who had already promoted these talking points and emotional influences in the mob prior to January 6th even happening.

I think it's clear who influenced the mob more, but I'm willing to listen how 26 informants over a crowd of tens of thousands of people had that sort of impact.

See SFP, the problem is not that you don't know who those individuals are. The problem is not that many or all of those individuals have never been publicly identified. The problem is you didn't think to ask the question before coming to the lemming's conclusion that you did.

quote:

---

But their actions show they went with malicious intent.

---

Maliciously abiding rope lines ...



Maliciously escorted into the Senate well by Capitol Hill Police ...



Maliciously taking selfies with CHP ...

It's not speculation the actions prove it out. Once they engaged the police it becomes self evident.

quote:

---

The whole thing could have been dealt with differently in the aftermath

---

No kidding!

But the aftermath was not where things should have been "dealt with." Things should have been dealt with in the weeks-long run up, as Trump requested.

Pelosi and her corrupt cronies got exactly what they wanted. Her office had security stand down and requests for reinforcements. You mentioned "Banging on the doors." But those doors could not be breached without being unlocked. The locks are magnetic and remotely located.The capitol building doors were opened somehow. Still unanswered as far as I know, is who opened them?

The verifiably false story about the death of Officer Brian Sicknick was propagandized for months. His body was laid in state in the capitol rotunda as if he were martyred on J6. It was a flat out absurdity.

Verifiably false testimony was given to Congress about everything from the responses of President Trump to Nancy Pelosi on J6. False testimony was given by Capitol Hill policeman and others. That was a national disgrace.

Inert pipe bombs were placed, by whom we still don't know. But we do know that the response at the scene indicated straight away that officers, FBI, and other responders were NEVER concerned about them even before they were inspected. We know that because the responses were recorded on security cameras in real time. Responders were beyond lackadaisical. Pedestrians were allowed to continue to walk on the sidewalk within feet of the supposed pipe bombs even after their discovery. That is not the behavior of a team concerned about an IED. It is the behavior of a team that knew beforehand that there was no real danger. The question is "how did they know?"

We know, iconic photographs were taken of "barbarians scaling the walls of the capital building." Yet, to my knowledge, none of those in the photograph were publicly identified, or prosecuted. Considering the extent of the FBI nationwide J6 investigations, that is almost inconceivably odd. The rational conclusion, one would draw is that those photographs were staged, and investigators were aware.

The saga of Ray Epps is very similar. He was one of the most prominent instigators, urging crowds to trespass. Yet there was no initial will to prosecute the man, and when he was finally prosecuted due to immense public pressure, he never served one minute in jail. Not one! Contrast that with the monstrous treatment of people who were little more than curiosity seekers walking onto Capitol grounds, to see what was going on and take a few selfies.

So when you say "The whole thing could have been dealt with differently in the aftermath," it is a massive understatement.

Likewise, the investigation differential between the "summer of love" riots and J6 was stunning. The summer of love" riots caused more damage, including arson of historic structures adjacent to the White House. The perpetrators were identifiable. What happened?

The cornering of Senator Rand Paul and his wife after a White House event should have resulted in a huge number of arrests. Unlike J6, that actually was a real threat to a sitting senator. It was caught on film. The perpetrators were identifiable. What happened?

So when you belittle the new January 6 report, you need to think about what you're actually doing.

all democrats do is lie

quote:

---

So certainly they identified all the members in that photograph

---

I located the fallacy upon which your dishonest question is built, FYI

The only people arguing that assumption occurred are being dishonest about J6.

Note: I reject that assumption, so it's not me.