
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: French high school torched on fire with 100 students trapped inside this morning
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:12 pm to Jbird
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:12 pm to Jbird
I didn't say he was a paid poster. But to say that "nobody" is paid to post here is a foolish comment. There are undoubtedly paid posters here. 100% and without a doubt.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:13 pm to BoarEd
No ivorypud did.
Settle the frick down he accused long time posters as paid
Settle the frick down he accused long time posters as paid
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:14 pm to BoarEd
I just said there are bots
Are you suggesting Chicken is paying MrLSU and me to post?
Are you suggesting Chicken is paying MrLSU and me to post?
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:14 pm to lake chuck fan
I think what he means if me or like minded parents learned this was happening where I live at North Corbin elementary, things would have turned out different for rioters
Parents would be showing up in a bad mood and not giving two shits about consequences
Parents would be showing up in a bad mood and not giving two shits about consequences
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:16 pm to Jbird
I don't think it matters the length of time they have been here. In fact, being a long time poster is a good thing for such shills. They "establish credibility" and their words carry more weight.
I've always found it interesting how people will stay primarily on boards like tRant for years until it's time for elections and then they'll flock over here and all spout the same frickin nonsense.
Two examples. 3Down10 and Beefense. Neither one of those dipshits post here regularly and then both show up just in time for midterms saying exactly the same shite. And there are many others. Those are just two who stick out in my mind.
I've always found it interesting how people will stay primarily on boards like tRant for years until it's time for elections and then they'll flock over here and all spout the same frickin nonsense.
Two examples. 3Down10 and Beefense. Neither one of those dipshits post here regularly and then both show up just in time for midterms saying exactly the same shite. And there are many others. Those are just two who stick out in my mind.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:17 pm to teke184
quote:
The gendarmes better be pulling aside and beating the shite out of any “hooded youths”.
Shooting anyone attempting to block the doors would be more effective.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:17 pm to BoarEd
Meh
The new guys are the ones paint bot farms.
The new guys are the ones paint bot farms.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:18 pm to Jbird
quote:
Are you suggesting Chicken
Who said anything about Chicken? I doubt he is in the political narrative steering business personally. Seems more up ActBlue's alley actually.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:18 pm to kingbob
quote:
These aren’t “protests”. These are pogroms. These are North African Muslim immigrants forming mobs and attacking the white population by burning down schools and churches.
I had to look that up. Wasn't sure what pogrom meant.
I really recommend that anybody not familiar with that word looks it up. And knows the meaning.
I have very little doubt that some of them will start this shite up here in the US and the media will play it off as more BLM crap.
Big kudos there Bob.
This post was edited on 10/5/26 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:19 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Why are you dragging this thread off topic? Twice now so far. Also, at least one of those men is a dual British-Iranian citizen and the British authorities have indeed linked it to an Iranian plot.
Again, why are you attempting to make this thread about things it is not?
It's exactly on topic. I think Mr. LSU posts things that frequently overstate the case against Muslims and Iran. I don't KNOW about the French school case yet.
His pattern in RAF Fairford and the FlyDubai attack are obvious. I'm disappointed that you wouldn't see the lie that Mr. LSU posted in the screenshot below. There was only ONE person (not several) that was arrested on the day in question. He is the ONLY person arrested with known Iran ties (he was a dual citizen, UK/Iran).
The 5 others that were arrested and released earlier in the week have only been reported to have been "British Nationals."
IF Mr. LSU were just a clumsy poster, he would have answered that question by now.
With FlyDubai, he posted that:
-"looks like Iran had ties"... then supported it with an X post that just talked about coincidental timing
-"attacker had help"...because of an allegation that some of the stewards asked that his handcuffs be taken off...doesn't justify an inference that the Kenyan stewards were helping him
-"Trump thinks Iran might have done it"...then posts Trump just answering a reporter's suggestion. This was before the serious reporting that shows investigators think the attacker was a lone wolf.
FWIW, here's ChatGPT's summary of the "he had help" scenario
###########
As of October 5, 2026, there is no publicly reported evidence that the FlyDubai attacker had an accomplice or was directed by another person or organization.
What investigators are saying is actually fairly significant:
Israeli investigators currently believe he probably acted alone. Sources familiar with the investigation told CBS that the early assessment is a “lone-wolf” attack, although the investigation remains active. ?
CBS News
Another Israeli source told CNN/ITV that investigators presently know of no connection to a terrorist organization or government. That includes the Iranian connection that President Trump initially raised as a possibility. ?
ITVX
The UAE investigation is specifically examining whether the attack involved “prior planning or direction.” So investigators have not simply assumed that he acted alone; they're looking at that question. ?
Foreign Affairs Ministry
There is now evidence that the attack was planned before he was hired by FlyDubai. Reuters reports that, according to Israeli officials briefed on the UAE investigation, he told UAE interrogators that he had planned the attack before joining FlyDubai. That establishes premeditation, but doesn't establish assistance from anyone else. ?
Investing.com
One particularly interesting new detail is that he apparently had previously operated a flight to Tel Aviv and allegedly contemplated hijacking/crashing that flight as well. That again points toward his own planning, although investigators are still determining whether anyone else knew about or assisted those plans. ?
Investing.com
What about the flight crew?
This is where I would distinguish suspicious circumstances from evidence of complicity.
Passengers have reported that some crew members wanted the restrained attacker untied after the passengers had subdued him. That understandably raised questions among passengers. However, there is currently no reported evidence that those crew members were participants in the attack, and FlyDubai has declined to comment while the investigation continues. ?
India Today
So, at this point I'd separate the evidence into:
Question
Current evidence
Did he plan the attack?
Yes, apparently
Did he intend to crash the aircraft?
Yes, according to investigators/sources
Did he have extremist/radicalization concerns in his background?
Yes, according to investigators and Israeli officials
Did another person help him physically carry out the attack?
No public evidence so far
Was he directed by Iran or another government?
No evidence publicly established
Did investigators check for outside direction?
Yes
Do Israeli investigators currently think he acted alone?
Yes, provisionally
One thing I would not dismiss, though, is the distinction between “acted alone” and “had no outside contacts.” The former is what investigators currently appear to believe; the latter hasn't been established. The UAE investigation is still looking into planning, direction and possible terrorist connections. ?
Foreign Affairs Ministry +1
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:20 pm to Tupelo
Would be more effective, but I wasn’t sure if they were armed with rifles or if they just had batons like the British cops.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:21 pm to Wolfwireless
Think about how cheap and easy it would be for an evil state like Iran to do this.
It’s scary.
We weren’t meant to be a diverse group living in harmony and sitting in drum circles. That’s more clear than ever.
It’s scary.
We weren’t meant to be a diverse group living in harmony and sitting in drum circles. That’s more clear than ever.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:21 pm to IvoryBillMatt
You are officially the worst poster on this board. That is quite the accomplishment.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:22 pm to IvoryBillMatt
If you don't know about this school in france you don't know if it fits this "pattern" you're talking about here and this *pattern" is not the topic of this thread. No, it is not on topic.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:26 pm to BoarEd
Look who you a dealing with Boar.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:30 pm to Jbird
Its really kinda scary. Im fifty years old and never thought I would see this. Now, I can see something like happening on the East or West coast.... not so much on gulf coast.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:31 pm to GreenRockTiger
quote:
And if you drive up and start shooting rioters, you’re going to jail.
Just so you know... I will take my chances... as if 'jail' means much at that time.
Guess, I would have to put my trust in the families & friends of the innocent trapped youth, teachers and administrators.
Posted on 10/5/26 at 3:32 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
Why the frick would you jump to believe "subsequent reporting"?
because it says what you want to be true?
I don't want anything to be true. I just want the truth.
President Trump’s initial off the cuff remark----which Mr. LSU posted in response to the reporting as (I guess) some "evidence" of Iranian involvement---is much less credible than the several reports that subsequently have come out quoting ACTUAL investigators who have said that all indications are that the attacker acted alone...without the assistance of Iran or anyone else.
This is just the stuff that Trump makes up off the top of his head when asked about it from reporters. With the Minab School and RAF Fairford, President Trump promised he would show us the evidence. Like those cases, we won't ever see any evidence...because...wait for it...the President makes stuff up just because it sounds good.

Popular
Back to top


2







