- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:00 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I cannot wait for your reaction after midterms when the blue wave proves false, and then 2020 when Trump wins reelection.
He’s already got that covered:
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:01 am to Rex
Keep melting you bitch
Only 7 more years to go until Pence takes over
Stupid cuck whore
Only 7 more years to go until Pence takes over
Stupid cuck whore
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:03 am to Rex
She did, which is the point of the laptop emails. She included Huma on them and her emails were on his laptop.
And why should Fox "let it go"? Its new news that should be reported on. Your fake outrage originally consisted of where Fox ranked the story in level of importance by making it the top story.
And why should Fox "let it go"? Its new news that should be reported on. Your fake outrage originally consisted of where Fox ranked the story in level of importance by making it the top story.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:08 am to Rex
quote:
Even if she had (she didn't) the fact that Fox can't let it go shows quite clearly that it's nothing more than a Trump Apologist network. Distract! Distract! Distract!
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:09 am to Rex
That's angryman typing right there.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:10 am to Rex
quote:
in the midst of the knowledge that MANY Trump aides have had access to top secret information without proper clearances
You clearly don't understand how interim clearances work do you?
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:10 am to Rex
He’s still your president
This post was edited on 3/2/18 at 8:11 am
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:15 am to Rex
quote:
Fox News's top story... you can't make this up... Hillary's emails
In the big picture, Treason is the bigger story.
Uranium 1
Clinton foundation pay for play
Bengazi
Illegal wire taps on US Citizens
Iran nuclear deal
E-mailing classified documents
Yep, these should be the headlines. What is wrong with the MSM not covering what is important?
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:15 am to Rex
quote:
Unlike people such as yourself I try to get all perspectives.
Lol @ Rex admitting to watching Fox News because his stations don't report real news
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:16 am to Rex
Rex;dr;dv 
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:16 am to Rex
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced a stern rebuke from congressional colleagues for citing skin color in voting against a white federal judge nominee earlier this week.
Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum, a white lawyer who is a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough in Greenville, S.C.,“speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary.”
Sen. Chuck Schumer on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum because he's white. Schumer argued the nomination "speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump's selections for the federal judiciary."
He complained that many of Trump’s nominees have been white males. He also complained that Republicans previously held up two black judges nominated under the Obama administration for the position— which The Post and Courier notes has long been vacant.
“It is long past time that the judiciary starts looking a lot more like the America it represents,” Schumer said. “Having a diversity of views and experience on the federal bench is necessary for the equal administration of justice.”
The senator said that with Quattlebaum’s nomination, the Trump administration was “taking a giant step backwards” in terms of diversity.
Quattlebaum was ultimately confirmed to the district judgeship on Thursday, 69-29.
Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, slammed Schumer for his statements.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Thursday it was actually Schumer’s vote against Quattlebaum that was “a massive step backward.”
While Schumer “is not a racist,” Graham tweeted, “this was an absolutely shameful reason to vote against a very qualified nominee like Marvin Quattlebaum.” He added, “Voting against a highly qualified nominee because of the color of his skin does nothing to bring our country and nation together.”
Don Beatty and Alison Lee were both nominated by the Obama administration to fill the federal judgeship.
Sen. Tim Scott, also a Republican serving South Carolina and the GOP’s sole black senator, tweeted, “Perhaps Senate Democrats should be more worried about the lack of diversity on their own staffs than attacking an extremely well-qualified judicial nominee from the great state of South Carolina.”
Schumer asserted that the only reason Quattlebaum was nominated for the unoccupied position was because the state’s Republican senators didn’t return their “blue slips” — a blue form used by senators to voice approval or disapproval for a home state nominee — for Obama nominees Alison Lee and Don Beatty in 2013.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., countered on Twitter that Lee’s nomination “was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue” and Beatty eventually was appointed as the Chief Justice of the state’s Supreme Court.
Trey Gowdy ?
@TGowdySC
"I hate to interrupt Senator Schumer with facts. But one nominee (that was supposedly blocked by Rs - according to Schumer) was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue, while the other became the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court."
And yet, the Dems still hold the most EMBARRASSING news story of the week. These are the people you stand behind and support, Rex. Any further bullshite spewed from your keys is moot.
Sit down and be quiet, bitch.
Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum, a white lawyer who is a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough in Greenville, S.C.,“speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary.”
Sen. Chuck Schumer on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum because he's white. Schumer argued the nomination "speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump's selections for the federal judiciary."
He complained that many of Trump’s nominees have been white males. He also complained that Republicans previously held up two black judges nominated under the Obama administration for the position— which The Post and Courier notes has long been vacant.
“It is long past time that the judiciary starts looking a lot more like the America it represents,” Schumer said. “Having a diversity of views and experience on the federal bench is necessary for the equal administration of justice.”
The senator said that with Quattlebaum’s nomination, the Trump administration was “taking a giant step backwards” in terms of diversity.
Quattlebaum was ultimately confirmed to the district judgeship on Thursday, 69-29.
Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, slammed Schumer for his statements.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Thursday it was actually Schumer’s vote against Quattlebaum that was “a massive step backward.”
While Schumer “is not a racist,” Graham tweeted, “this was an absolutely shameful reason to vote against a very qualified nominee like Marvin Quattlebaum.” He added, “Voting against a highly qualified nominee because of the color of his skin does nothing to bring our country and nation together.”
Don Beatty and Alison Lee were both nominated by the Obama administration to fill the federal judgeship.
Sen. Tim Scott, also a Republican serving South Carolina and the GOP’s sole black senator, tweeted, “Perhaps Senate Democrats should be more worried about the lack of diversity on their own staffs than attacking an extremely well-qualified judicial nominee from the great state of South Carolina.”
Schumer asserted that the only reason Quattlebaum was nominated for the unoccupied position was because the state’s Republican senators didn’t return their “blue slips” — a blue form used by senators to voice approval or disapproval for a home state nominee — for Obama nominees Alison Lee and Don Beatty in 2013.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., countered on Twitter that Lee’s nomination “was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue” and Beatty eventually was appointed as the Chief Justice of the state’s Supreme Court.
Trey Gowdy ?
@TGowdySC
"I hate to interrupt Senator Schumer with facts. But one nominee (that was supposedly blocked by Rs - according to Schumer) was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue, while the other became the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court."
And yet, the Dems still hold the most EMBARRASSING news story of the week. These are the people you stand behind and support, Rex. Any further bullshite spewed from your keys is moot.
Sit down and be quiet, bitch.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:16 am to Rex
**I'll leave the double post just to take up a chunk of your stupid melty thread. You're welcome**
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced a stern rebuke from congressional colleagues for citing skin color in voting against a white federal judge nominee earlier this week.
Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum, a white lawyer who is a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough in Greenville, S.C.,“speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary.”
Sen. Chuck Schumer on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum because he's white. Schumer argued the nomination "speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump's selections for the federal judiciary."
He complained that many of Trump’s nominees have been white males. He also complained that Republicans previously held up two black judges nominated under the Obama administration for the position— which The Post and Courier notes has long been vacant.
“It is long past time that the judiciary starts looking a lot more like the America it represents,” Schumer said. “Having a diversity of views and experience on the federal bench is necessary for the equal administration of justice.”
The senator said that with Quattlebaum’s nomination, the Trump administration was “taking a giant step backwards” in terms of diversity.
Quattlebaum was ultimately confirmed to the district judgeship on Thursday, 69-29.
Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, slammed Schumer for his statements.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Thursday it was actually Schumer’s vote against Quattlebaum that was “a massive step backward.”
While Schumer “is not a racist,” Graham tweeted, “this was an absolutely shameful reason to vote against a very qualified nominee like Marvin Quattlebaum.” He added, “Voting against a highly qualified nominee because of the color of his skin does nothing to bring our country and nation together.”
Don Beatty and Alison Lee were both nominated by the Obama administration to fill the federal judgeship.
Sen. Tim Scott, also a Republican serving South Carolina and the GOP’s sole black senator, tweeted, “Perhaps Senate Democrats should be more worried about the lack of diversity on their own staffs than attacking an extremely well-qualified judicial nominee from the great state of South Carolina.”
Schumer asserted that the only reason Quattlebaum was nominated for the unoccupied position was because the state’s Republican senators didn’t return their “blue slips” — a blue form used by senators to voice approval or disapproval for a home state nominee — for Obama nominees Alison Lee and Don Beatty in 2013.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., countered on Twitter that Lee’s nomination “was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue” and Beatty eventually was appointed as the Chief Justice of the state’s Supreme Court.
Trey Gowdy ?
@TGowdySC
"I hate to interrupt Senator Schumer with facts. But one nominee (that was supposedly blocked by Rs - according to Schumer) was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue, while the other became the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court."
And yet, the Dems still hold the most EMBARRASSING news story of the week. These are the people you stand behind and support, Rex. Any further bullshite spewed from your keys is moot.
Sit down and be quiet, bitch.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced a stern rebuke from congressional colleagues for citing skin color in voting against a white federal judge nominee earlier this week.
Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum, a white lawyer who is a partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough in Greenville, S.C.,“speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary.”
Sen. Chuck Schumer on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's nomination of Marvin Quattlebaum because he's white. Schumer argued the nomination "speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump's selections for the federal judiciary."
He complained that many of Trump’s nominees have been white males. He also complained that Republicans previously held up two black judges nominated under the Obama administration for the position— which The Post and Courier notes has long been vacant.
“It is long past time that the judiciary starts looking a lot more like the America it represents,” Schumer said. “Having a diversity of views and experience on the federal bench is necessary for the equal administration of justice.”
The senator said that with Quattlebaum’s nomination, the Trump administration was “taking a giant step backwards” in terms of diversity.
Quattlebaum was ultimately confirmed to the district judgeship on Thursday, 69-29.
Republican lawmakers, meanwhile, slammed Schumer for his statements.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Thursday it was actually Schumer’s vote against Quattlebaum that was “a massive step backward.”
While Schumer “is not a racist,” Graham tweeted, “this was an absolutely shameful reason to vote against a very qualified nominee like Marvin Quattlebaum.” He added, “Voting against a highly qualified nominee because of the color of his skin does nothing to bring our country and nation together.”
Don Beatty and Alison Lee were both nominated by the Obama administration to fill the federal judgeship.
Sen. Tim Scott, also a Republican serving South Carolina and the GOP’s sole black senator, tweeted, “Perhaps Senate Democrats should be more worried about the lack of diversity on their own staffs than attacking an extremely well-qualified judicial nominee from the great state of South Carolina.”
Schumer asserted that the only reason Quattlebaum was nominated for the unoccupied position was because the state’s Republican senators didn’t return their “blue slips” — a blue form used by senators to voice approval or disapproval for a home state nominee — for Obama nominees Alison Lee and Don Beatty in 2013.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., countered on Twitter that Lee’s nomination “was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue” and Beatty eventually was appointed as the Chief Justice of the state’s Supreme Court.
Trey Gowdy ?
@TGowdySC
"I hate to interrupt Senator Schumer with facts. But one nominee (that was supposedly blocked by Rs - according to Schumer) was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue, while the other became the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court."
And yet, the Dems still hold the most EMBARRASSING news story of the week. These are the people you stand behind and support, Rex. Any further bullshite spewed from your keys is moot.
Sit down and be quiet, bitch.
This post was edited on 3/2/18 at 8:19 am
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:16 am to Rex
Are you aware of the fact that you are melting?
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:16 am to Rex
quote:Hey Puppy humper.
Trump aides have had access to top secret information without proper clearances
Just ask the Clinton administration.
More than a year into Bill Clinton’s first term, of 1,044 White Houser personnel, nearly 100 had no security clearance at all, according to press reports in 1994.
The scandal alarmed both Republicans and Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, who wrote to CIA Director James Woolsey on March 17, 1994.
And there was a problem with basic passes. Nearly one-third of all staff lacked permanent grounds and building passes.
The Washington Times reported that the blame lied with an associate White House counsel and former law partner to Hillary Clinton. The counsel chose to stop sending FBI background checks to the Secret Service for review after the office objected to passes for two staffers for security reasons.
At the time, The Washington Times reported that more than 500 of the 1,000 background checks of Clinton personnel “would have prevented the people [involved] from obtaining security clearances at the FBI, Defense Department or CIA.”
LINK
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:17 am to Rex
Were you wearing your pussy hat when you typed this?
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:17 am to Rex
You’re talking to the mentally ill on this board lol. I’m not sure why you try so hard to reach out to them. Not even Trump taking their guns would make them stop seeing him as “god emperor”.
Russia just threatened the us with a new nuclear weapon and Trump took it like a bitch not saying a single word. The people on this board will just say it’s 18d chess.
My point is, stop posting to the retards. You just seem like a masochist.
Russia just threatened the us with a new nuclear weapon and Trump took it like a bitch not saying a single word. The people on this board will just say it’s 18d chess.
My point is, stop posting to the retards. You just seem like a masochist.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:20 am to Rex
quote:
he day after the Orange Shitgibbon tanked the stock market by announcing steel and aluminum tariffs that nobody outside those industries wants
OK, just so we're clear, it is Trumps stock market now?
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:20 am to Rex
quote:
White House to obtain massive loans for his family business,
Curious...Obama paid his mother in law north of 160k per year, for nothing. Are you upset about that? Sure seems that would qualify as family business.
Chelsey Go into was getting 600k speaking engagements when the Clinton Foundation was taking Russian money and while her mom was running for president, and while she was secretary of state.
Show us your posts about your anger over that OR show us why she was worthy of those speaking fees.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:21 am to Rex
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News