re: Fox News settles with Seth Rich Family - pays to keep quiet till after Election

quote:

---

So you edited.

---

Let me help you out there, short bus. You responded to this post.

quote:

---

Awww, you just now realizing your interpretation of the article isn't what you thought it was? That's sad.

---

The only post i edited was this post.

quote:

---

I'm asking you again, since your need to want to spike the football in a game of badminton is rather odd, what is it, you think this article is saying?

Or do you think this is some sort of win, after you got beat down rather thoroughly when it came out that many members of ANTIFA were arrested because of the Capital break in. I remember you being called out A LOT, and you never returned to those threads. Is this thread some sort of weird retribution that only You think you finally "got him".
This post was edited on 1/19 at 12:08 pm

---

The bolded section was added. So, i'm curious, what word did i edit?

Simple question? Lol, who, reading this, do you think believes that? We both know you don’t.

In terms of Sandman, BK, go get them! Take them to court and make the case, I won’t stand in the way.

First amendment has always had limits, assuming you knew that, calm down w the faux outrage. You act like censorship and crossing that line are the same thing.

quote:

---

when directly challenged the story doesn’t stand up.

---

Settled does not equal what you are saying it does here...

quote:

---

Settled does not equal what you are saying it does here...

---

Retraction + settlement + other retractions/apologies = _____?

quote:

---

You think it was just a robbery gone wrong?

---

As opposed to a robbery going right?

quote:

---

Lying has a cost...especially when you're lies inflict additional suffering on the parents and siblings of a deceased son/brother?

---

Timing of the settlement before ole Tick Tock and Lou D testified suggests maybe that the fire that was creating the smoke was burning a bit hotter than the parents had thought.

Oh, and his name was Seth Rich.

quote:

---

Address the whole equation pal.

---

Your point is valid. But it isn't an absolute fact. It appears to me FOX ran with a story without properly vetting the information. I absolutely agree with that. The question is, did they do it with malicious intent or just eager haste? Is it possible they were reporting a false narrative? Yes. Is it possible they were just extremely negligent? Yes. Is it also possible that they were duped and had an honest attempt at reporting this story. I say yes. Now, could this defense be dragged out and fought and won? Maybe. It was dismissed initially. An appeals court picked it up after. So is it possible that FOX decided that fighting it would cost more than the settlement amount? Yes. Notice I used the word possible. I claim none of this to be absolute facts. But certainly possibilities. Here is my test question for you, since you used the equation as your test question. True or False? All settlements made equate to the defendant(s) being guilty of what the plaintiff accused?

quote:

---

All settlements made equate to the defendant(s) being guilty of what the plaintiff accused?

---

Of course not, however, totality of facts...whenever this Seth rich murder narrative is challenged it falls.

quote:

---

Lying has a cost...especially when you're lies inflict additional suffering on the parents and siblings of a deceased son/brother?

---

Like HRCs lies about Benghazi, her server (which was hacked by 5 countries who obtained Top Secret info from the server, thus compromising US assets and US spies)? The dims lies about Trump/Rushia collusion? The lies about Hiden NOT having dementia? The lies the See Eye Aye and Eff Bee Eye said claiming they did not spy on the Trump campaign? The lies are too many to list. Their lies caused great damage to 350 million people in this country.