- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former abortion doctor says: ‘You Never Need Late-Term Abortion To Save A Woman’s Life’
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:25 pm to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:25 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
t was your filth that cut out crucial parts of his interview that made it sound like something it wasn't.
Which part? The proposed 3rd trimester abortion that was legalized in New York, Rhode Island, and attempted in Virginia or the killing the baby after birth? Maybe you can clear that up in context.
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 2:26 pm
1
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:25 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Hell even I can do with a week or 2 shorter than 20 weeks.
My. How big of you.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:25 pm to L.A.
My wife has delivered babies for 13 years. She has yet to see or even hear about a scenario that forces death to the infant for the mother's survival. ZERO cases
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:25 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:Perhaps you should do less of this . . .
I don't really recall.
quote:quote:
you don't understand WTF you are discussing (my suspicion)quote:Suspicion confirmed
ShreveportHog94
quote:Then you neither listened to the Governor, nor to the bill's author Tran, nor to any of the legion of Dems who jumped to their defense.
I have yet to hear a single argument for this
Hate to do this to you again, but current law in all 50 states already gives the medical team and the mother right to end a pregnancy based on life of the mother. Current law in all 50 states already gives the medical team and parents the right to end heroic measures undertaken for their child.
Got it yet?
What the law does not allow, is killing a baby in the process of it being delivered. That is why VA proabortionists want to change the law.
LINK
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:25 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Without arguing in favor or against this proposal ... who pays the hundreds of thousands of dollars necessary to preserve the life of a fetus delivered at this early stage?
The mother does not want the pregnancy, so she should not be responsible. Taxpayers? Adoptive parents?
Probably the same people that would pay if the baby became very ill when it was 3 months old.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:26 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
That was in response to a poster suggesting that at no time is an abortion needed to save a mother's life or that preganncy is never a risk to health. Nothing to do with late term.
Backtracking... crawfishing... whatever it's called... you seem to be good at it.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:27 pm to SSpaniel
quote:The word must have gotten out on liberal boards that verbally supporting the murder of infants was not a political winner.
Backtracking... crawfishing... whatever it's called... you seem to be good at it.
Sad this had to be put out.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:28 pm to The Swindler
quote:
My wife has delivered babies for 13 years. She has yet to see or even hear about a scenario that forces death to the infant for the mother's survival. ZERO cases
quote:quote:And no legit doctor is going to recommend late-term abortion as the means to save a woman's life, because abortion would be an unsafe option to that end.
They access the situation and make suggestions.
LINK
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:29 pm to SSpaniel
quote:The earliest premature birth to actually survive is 22 weeks, so "yes."
after 24 weeks is considered "this early stage" by you? Really?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:30 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
verbally supporting the murder of infants was not a political winner.
I can't imagine why.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:32 pm to NC_Tigah
I support a woman’s right to abort up to 20 weeks. I cannot in good conscious support any late term abortions unless they legitimately threaten a woman’s life. I’ve spoken to many doctors on this subject and the overwhelming consensus is that a woman can have a c-sect in 3rd trimester with no issues if he life’s in danger.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:32 pm to AggieHank86
quote:However there are many instances of prenatal EGA <22wks surviving.
The earliest premature birth to actually survive is 22 weeks, so "yes."
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:34 pm to BugAC
quote:
"If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother," Northam said, alluding to the physician and mother discussing whether the born infant should live or die.
Something that should entirely be up to the mother with the advice and guidance of physicians. Nothing wrong with it at all.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:35 pm to GRTiger
quote:
To say late term abortions are needed in cases where the mother's life is in danger is a scientifically ignorant statement.
Liberals have shown themselves to be ignorant to science when convenient
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:35 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Nothing wrong with it at all.
Then Gosnell should be released from prison.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:35 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Something that should entirely be up to the mother with the advice and guidance of physicians. Nothing wrong with it at all.
May God have mercy on your soul.
Of course, in a couple days time, you "won't really recall" any of what you've posted in this thread, will you?
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:36 pm to BugAC
quote:Any legislator who would pass ANY legislation without examining and considering the associated costs SHOULD NOT be sitting in said legislature.
Well for not arguing "in favor" of one side or another, you sure as shite are painting abortion as an economic budgeting tool, rather than a matter of life or death.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:36 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:NO SIR!
Something that should entirely be up to the mother
The life of an infant or child or adult should not entirely be up to the mother
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
NO SIR!
The life of an infant or child or adult should not entirely be up to the mother
Especially if her choice is to end the life of the already born infant. At that point, both the choice AND the infant should be taken out of her hands.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:39 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:Ah
Something that should entirely be up to the mother with the advice and guidance of physicians. Nothing wrong with it at all.
Back to supporting child murder.
That's the Shreve we all know
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News