Started By
Message

re: For Those of You Who Scoff at Election Fraud; Do You Think the LA Mayor's Race Was Legit?

Posted on 7/17/26 at 9:47 am to
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43312 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Spencer Pratt wasn’t cheated for the simple reason that no one had any reason to cheat him.


It is statistically impossible how Nithya Raman pulled so close to Bass with Pratt in the race.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57122 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 9:50 am to
quote:

It is statistically impossible how Nithya Raman pulled so close to Bass with Pratt in the race.

That is false. Raman was far and away the top choice of the homeless population that made up much of the last minute vote. The fact that these votes came in late is very suspicious, just like in every election that includes an inner city. You can claim it is improbable, but any claim that it is impossible is just elevating an opinion to the level of fact.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43312 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

That is false. Raman was far and away the top choice of the homeless population that made up much of the last minute vote


It was mail in ballots that put her over the top.
She should have been getting that proportional share the whole time. It makes no sense how she surged last minute with mail in ballots.

They tried to say it was younger voters, but how did so many younger voters decide to mail in all their ballots at the same time?
This post was edited on 7/17/26 at 10:54 am
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2552 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Spencer Pratt wasn’t cheated

quote:

yes, the lax voting rules almost surely result in systemic cheating


LOL

So what prevents systemic cheating among these communists? An honor code?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57122 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

So what prevents systemic cheating among these communists? An honor code?

I think they are cheating and have been for decades in every election that matters. My point about Pratt is not that cheating didn’t happen, but that Pratt had 0.0% chance of being mayor even if he had made the runoff. The L.A. electorate is deep blue.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12978 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 12:33 pm to
Its amazing to me that we have people on here that are so low IQ they think it requires 'fraud' for a liberal commie democrat to be elected in Los Angeles of all places

Think about the logic you are using when you make that claim.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91134 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

It is statistically impossible how Nithya Raman pulled so close to Bass with Pratt in the race.



Yes. She not only beat Pratt, but also beat Bass.

If they split those votes between the 2 she might not have had enough to go above Pratt.

Now they get a showdown between 2 Democrats instead of a D and R.

It's totally rigged.








This post was edited on 7/17/26 at 12:38 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91134 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Think about the logic you are using when you make that claim.


How does the person pulling 3rd magically get more votes than anyone?

She got more than Bass. If anything bass should have received more votes.


Unless you honestly believe only communists vote by mail. Which they don't, my Republican parents vote by mail. And it's easy to cheat.

Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12978 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

How does the person pulling 3rd magically get more votes than anyone?

They don't stop counting when only half the ballots are counted they count all of them. How do you not understand this?

Los Angeles is a liberal commie haven they don't need to 'rig' or 'cheat' or have 'fraud' to win a primary or a general election.
quote:

She got more than Bass.

People hate Bass and voted for the other Commie who was also running. I'll ask again, how do you not understand this? We aren't talking about Alabama or Mississippi here we are talking about Los Angeles California that is woke, commie and pinko lib as frick. They don't need to 'rig' an election for christ sakes to get a pinko commie lib to win.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51153 posts
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Pratt had 0.0% chance of being mayor even if he had made the runoff.




That's not the issue, dude.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18347 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 6:04 am to
quote:

It is bullshite but legal in Cali



And there is the problem law makers made it legal. California is worse than a fricking 3rd world country
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481095 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 6:51 am to
quote:

That's not the issue, dude.


Removing the entire motive for cheating isn't part of the issue of cheating?

This is like the people who melt when the 2020 and 2024 California Presidential vote data is brought up, which hurts multiple narratives about the steal in 2020 and why Trump won in 2024, who then pretend that CA had a huge voter fraud operation in 2020 for Biden for....reasons, and no voter fraud in 2024 for Kamala for secret reasons.

*ETA: Post I recently made about CA's DEM voting in Pesidential elections

quote:

quote:

Obama didn’t have the benefit of mass mail in voting like Biden and Trump did in 2020. If he did he likely hits 90 million votes in 2008.


California Presidential Election Results for DEM Candiate:

2008: 8,274,473 LINK
2012: 7,854,285 LINK
2016: 8,753,792 LINK
2020: 11,110,250 LINK
2024: 9,276,179 LINK

There is no reason to cheat in California in 2020. Biden got 63.5% of the vote. Also, California already had expansive MIV and ballot harvesting Here is a report on the use in the 2018 midterms in CA. So, unlike many other states, those were constants in CA.

You can see the impact of this in 2024 when Kamala smoked 2008 Obama and Hillary by a wide margin. That's in a race when the DEMs were completely deflated, the moderates turned on them nationally, and they ran a candidate most DEMs hated.

The data from CA in 2020 should tell people it was not a normal election in terms of turnout.


This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 7:00 am
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11170 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:03 am to

quote:

They had to get him out of the spotlight because he was exposing Karen Bass and California politics for the frauds and incompetent leaders that they are.

They had to shut him up. Him making a runoff would have kept him in the spotlight and in more possible debates in which he was running circles around Karen Bass. He still would have likely lost, but part of that is Democrat cities are well versed in how to "count the votes".


^^^ this right here ^^^
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481095 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:04 am to
quote:

They had to get him out of the spotlight because he was exposing Karen Bass and California politics for the frauds and incompetent leaders that they are.

But he's still in the spotlight

Creating a conspiracy theory to ignore reality was a good try, but your point doesn't even work because that didn't happen.

quote:

He still would have likely lost


And you concede your CT is nothing more than virtue signaling in the most left state in one of the more left areas in the US. Destroys what little point you may have had.
Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
4681 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:42 am to
So no one was cheated BUT there is systemic cheating?

How does that work?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51153 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

They had to get him out of the spotlight because he was exposing Karen Bass and California politics for the frauds and incompetent leaders that they are.


But he's still in the spotlight


quote:

SlowFlowPro



What a complete idiot you are. They kept "counting votes" until Pratt fell to 3rd place and out of the race. The person originally in 3rd place, another corrupt woke joke like Bass, had been behind by a considerable margin.

You actually watched them count votes for 3 weeks past election night until Pratt was finally eliminated, and you honestly couldn't figure out what was going on?

You're a fool.


Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51153 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

So no one was cheated BUT there is systemic cheating?

How does that work?


You're trying to logically interact with yet another clueless wonder here.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481095 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:57 am to
quote:

What a complete idiot you are.


KCT then goes on to post completely irrelevant stuff to the post to which he replied and quoted
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
51153 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:57 am to
quote:

But he's still in the spotlight


He's out of the race, you fool.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481095 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 7:58 am to
quote:

He's out of the race, you fool.


Update: I did not say he was still in the race
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram