- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For all the attorneys that post on here
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:47 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:47 am to BBONDS25
quote:I’m saying how does he reconcile being an attorney and posting shite in TD with the ROPC. A well respected attorney shite posting on TD? He shits on everyone’s opinion? Why not be open?
Are you saying SFP is not a lawyer? You would be incorrect. He is a lawyer. A pretty respected one. He and I don’t agree on here much. Take it for what it’s worth.
Prove it. But no. You can’t.
Are you an Attorney? Sue me!
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 1:06 am
1
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:51 am to W2NOMO
You should delete this thread, OP. While I almost always disagree with SFP/VOR, neither post anything that should affect their bar license.
Plus, there are plenty of us attorneys that post things on here (TD.com) for fun to blow off steam.
Plus, there are plenty of us attorneys that post things on here (TD.com) for fun to blow off steam.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:52 am to TheOcean
quote:
You should delete this thread, OP. While I almost always disagree with SFP/VOR, neither post anything that should affect their bar license. Plus, there are plenty of us attorneys that post things on here (TD.com) for fun to blow off steam.
sure okay. Why? If they’ve done nothing wrong? Sue me! ETA:
really why do they (attorneys) need you to take up for them and why don’t they take up for themselves? This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 1:18 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 12:58 am to W2NOMO
quote:
W2NOMOquote:The fact he approached Marvel about doing Ghost Rider shows he's invested and isn't just getting a check, so it will likely be goodclassic avoidance.
He doesn’t owe you anything. Who the frick are you?
Posted on 7/27/26 at 1:01 am to jizzle6609
That is my point. Sue me
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 1:04 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 2:21 am to W2NOMO
quote:
I’m saying how does he reconcile being an attorney and posting shite in TD with the ROPC. A well respected attorney shite posting on TD? He shits on everyone’s opinion? Why not be open? Prove it. But no. You can’t. Are you an Attorney? Sue me!
You think there is some ODC rule against attorneys posting on TD? As long as he isn’t discussing his cases he will be just fine. Your threats to the contrary are coming off as a little bit desperate.
What is it you do for a living?
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 2:22 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:16 am to W2NOMO
quote:
Talking to you SFP. We all took the test as 2Ls right? You post a lot of shite here and talk down to everybody. Would you mind if the ODC knew you and your post? I sure the f wouldn’t.
Perceptions are interesting.
I don't view SFP as posting "a lot of shite here and talk down to everybody" at all. I view him as choosing contrarian positions to the board, and arguing them effectively. In terms of derision, he absorbs far more than he doles out.
Now then, WTF should the Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel have to do with posts here? I'll answer the rhetorical for you in terms of your post ...
NOT ONE THING !
NOTHING !
SFP offers opinions about case law. Sometimes, I disagree w/ him, as do many here. Sometimes I find his interpretation of the law disagreeable, although it is likely correct. Such discussion and dissension can actually be informative for all parties.
But if your standard is such that you would threaten or imply, disciplinary council be involved somehow with SFP's positions here, you would have to also believe that the legal license to practice for anyone in personal injury, and about half of those in general law should be pulled.
Because what y'all assert in courtrooms "to make your case" while gainsaying known truth, is exceedingly worse than anything posted on this anonymous message board.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:38 am to W2NOMO
You just can’t pull a geauxjudge or Sal Perricone.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:56 am to boosiebadazz
I think the posts only hurt his status as judge, primarily discussing Charlize Theron's adoption
It was the bribes that really did him in for his license.
Taking money to reverse/lower jury verdicts is definitely going to get ya
The worst part was that he was a certified douche. People think I'm arrogant or whatever but weren't around for the old days.
GJ was only slightly more embarrassing than the poster who defined being a dick who would always brag about going to Michigan Law (I think he had NY in his name) who came down for an OTGT and thought he was going to bed tigerrnurse and spent all this money to come and brag about it and get shut down and he left with his tail between his legs and I don't think he ever even posted again after that
And there is the infamous just me debacle after he helped pay for the flag football game in 2008 with a certain MLB pitcher playing QB
It was the bribes that really did him in for his license.
Taking money to reverse/lower jury verdicts is definitely going to get ya
The worst part was that he was a certified douche. People think I'm arrogant or whatever but weren't around for the old days.
GJ was only slightly more embarrassing than the poster who defined being a dick who would always brag about going to Michigan Law (I think he had NY in his name) who came down for an OTGT and thought he was going to bed tigerrnurse and spent all this money to come and brag about it and get shut down and he left with his tail between his legs and I don't think he ever even posted again after that
And there is the infamous just me debacle after he helped pay for the flag football game in 2008 with a certain MLB pitcher playing QB
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:06 am to SlowFlowPro
I thought the Theron posts are what initially got it him in trouble with ODC then they looked further and found the bribes.
And just me just drew the tasteless picture, right? Nothing implicating his law license or am I wrong on that?
And just me just drew the tasteless picture, right? Nothing implicating his law license or am I wrong on that?
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 6:07 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:13 am to boosiebadazz
Yes just discussing historical examples of actual douche attorneys on here.
Neither of those 2 examples had ethical implications
And I didn't think GJ 's 2 things were related but I could be wrong. That was 10+ years ago which means he should be out now
Neither of those 2 examples had ethical implications
And I didn't think GJ 's 2 things were related but I could be wrong. That was 10+ years ago which means he should be out now
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Were these guys just on the OT?
I think the posts only hurt his status as judge, primarily discussing Charlize Theron's adoption
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:24 am to NC_Tigah
He posted a lot on the OT but I don't remember if he posted on the political board. His posts have all been deleted so there is no historical record.
I do vaguely remember him making the thread on the OT bragging about the Theron adoption situation.
I do vaguely remember him making the thread on the OT bragging about the Theron adoption situation.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:28 am to NC_Tigah
Posting that Trump was convicted of rape then having to edit your post out of embarrassment is pretty damn reckless as a known attorney.
I couldn’t imagine being a client and reading some of his shite
I couldn’t imagine being a client and reading some of his shite
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:29 am to W2NOMO
quote:
That is my point. Sue me
Pointless.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:29 am to texag7
quote:Whoopsi.
Posting that Trump was convicted of rape
Who did that?
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:36 am to NC_Tigah
I did and clarified it was referencing the civil jury findings and left the post up unedited with the edit admitting the mistake.
He thinks he solved the mystery of Flight MH370 by referencing that when I left the original post up and publicly admitting my mistake.
It was like in court last week during a hearing when I mischaracterized an attorney's objection by referencing the wrong email (both contained different objections to different scenarios). When I realized the mistake later I admitted the issue and clarified everyone was like "Yeah we knew what you meant" and that was that.
He thinks he solved the mystery of Flight MH370 by referencing that when I left the original post up and publicly admitting my mistake.
It was like in court last week during a hearing when I mischaracterized an attorney's objection by referencing the wrong email (both contained different objections to different scenarios). When I realized the mistake later I admitted the issue and clarified everyone was like "Yeah we knew what you meant" and that was that.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the edit admitting the mistake.
You wouldn’t edit anything if you weren’t called out. You should know better
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:57 am to texag7
I admit when I'm wrong. People always lie and say I don't, but that's the perfect example showing how big of a lie this is.
That's why I didn't even edit the mistake. I left it up publicly to show how big the lie about me is.
That's why I didn't even edit the mistake. I left it up publicly to show how big the lie about me is.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:59 am to W2NOMO
I'm not a lawyer nor do I hang out with lawyers, but I have been on this board for a while. Any dude with the amount of posts that SFP has is not the kind of person I want to be associated with. Personally or professionally.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News