- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/6/19 at 2:57 pm to Bunyan
Probably because he is a material witness in a grand jury proceeding.
Posted on 6/6/19 at 2:59 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
quote:
The highly redacted documents revealed a startling fact, the 302 from the first interview with Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017 appears to be missing. The only document referencing the interview conducted by both Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his partner at the time FBI Special Agent Joe Pietka III, is an August 2017 document. The 302 from Aug. 22, 2017, is of an interview the bureau had with anti-Trump agent Strzok based on notes he had put into the FBI system on July 19. Those notes apparently were regarding his impressions of his interview with Flynn in January.
Improper doesn’t begin to describe what’s going on with the documents, said multiple former U.S. and senior FBI officials. The main question, they have, like so many others, is what happened to the original notes regarding the FBI’s interview with Flynn?
It isn’t difficult to decipher but there were only two people who would know directly what happened with the Jan. 24 interview: Strzok and Pientka.
So why hasn’t Pientka ever been questioned by Congress or by anyone that we know of, for that matter?
LINK
Posted on 6/6/19 at 2:59 pm to Bunyan
quote:
Why is Joe Pientka's name redacted??
My question as well
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:03 pm to Bunyan
FYI
Is this still the case?
quote:
Flynn had a phone call during the Trump transition period with the Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. This call was both intercepted and leaked out to cause harm. The Muller charges against Flynn and what he has plead guilty to committing, come from making false statements during his FBI interview.
It has come to light that DOJ Bruce Ohr meet with both Pientka and Strzok during this time period. Joe Pientka and a group of fellow FBI agents, all want to testify against Comey/McCabe/Strzok/and others. They want to be called while on active duty so their legal fees will be covered by the government.
Is this still the case?
This post was edited on 6/6/19 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:08 pm to Walkthedawg
How long before Jussie and Decatur show up to mention something about FARA violations that apparently Flynn wasn't guilty of
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:08 pm to GumboPot
quote:Not exactly what you were hoping for?
And this is the 302 that the Mueller team refused to turn over to Judge Sullivan?
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:09 pm to Walkthedawg
Where did you find that quote?
That’s very interesting.
That’s very interesting.
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:10 pm to JuiceTerry
Flynn lied about sanctions
This post was edited on 6/6/19 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:10 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Not exactly what you were hoping for?
Definitely not the answer I was hoping for.
I was hoping for an answer to the question, is this the 302 that the Mueller team refused to turn over to Judge Sullivan?
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:13 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
Judge Sullivan has ordered the release of the audio of John Dowd's voice mail to Flynn's now-former lawyer, Rob Kelner. pic.twitter.com/XTxZRVCyvs
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) June 6, 2019
I don't know what this means yet but seems important.
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:13 pm to Rebel
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:14 pm to TOKEN
quote:
Flynn lied about sanctions
To who?
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:16 pm to GumboPot
quote:Appears to be
is this the 302 that the Mueller team refused to turn over to Judge Sullivan?
quote:
The highly redacted documents revealed a startling fact, the 302 from the first interview with Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017 appears to be missing. The only document referencing the interview conducted by both Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his partner at the time FBI Special Agent Joe Pietka III, is an August 2017 document.
LINK
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:18 pm to NC_Tigah
frick the F B I
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:19 pm to YankeeBama
I see at least 3 instances where the FBI agents clearly had ADVANCED information. Meaning they already knew the answers and yet still asked him if he had certain interactions.
In other words, they clearly had his communications under surveillance and knew precise details of conversations, yet still asked him what he discussed at those instances.
The ONLY purpose to do this is to try and catch him in a possible perjury scenario.
The easy take-away from this 302 is, how did you get the transcripts of these Flynn phone calls and why? What was the probable cause used to get approval of spying on Flynn?
Was this part of an additional FISA warrant? Or was it abuse of the NSA 702 program?
Clearly nothing nefarious happened. The transition team was meeting with all sorts of countries Ambo's and leadership to try and get a head start on foreign policy relations.
So all they got him on was discrepancies between these 302 "statements" and what they ALREADY frickING KNEW WAS DISCUSSED?
That's dirty as frick right there.
In other words, they clearly had his communications under surveillance and knew precise details of conversations, yet still asked him what he discussed at those instances.
The ONLY purpose to do this is to try and catch him in a possible perjury scenario.
The easy take-away from this 302 is, how did you get the transcripts of these Flynn phone calls and why? What was the probable cause used to get approval of spying on Flynn?
Was this part of an additional FISA warrant? Or was it abuse of the NSA 702 program?
Clearly nothing nefarious happened. The transition team was meeting with all sorts of countries Ambo's and leadership to try and get a head start on foreign policy relations.
So all they got him on was discrepancies between these 302 "statements" and what they ALREADY frickING KNEW WAS DISCUSSED?
That's dirty as frick right there.
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:21 pm to bamarep
Rep has another fantasy go down the drain, so he changes the subject
How dumb are you to not know black soldiers made the ultimate sacrifice at Normandy, too?
You shite and fell back in it there
How dumb are you to not know black soldiers made the ultimate sacrifice at Normandy, too?
You shite and fell back in it there
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:23 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Not exactly what you were hoping for?
This is just the start carrot top
Posted on 6/6/19 at 3:23 pm to Walkthedawg
Nice source you had there, Qtard
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News