Started By
Message

re: FLOTUS announces new ban of "junk food" ads in schools

Posted on 2/25/14 at 9:19 pm to
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35335 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 9:19 pm to
1, 2, WNHI
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
24416 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 9:54 pm to
At some point you have to let people make their own decisions. No coke ad on a football scoreboard ever made someone obese.

Cokes and canteen don't cause obesity.

Obesity is because of the home.
Posted by OldTigahFot
Drinkin' with the rocket scientists
Member since Jan 2012
10507 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

proposes and announces are two different things.


Given this administration's propensity for making the rules up as they go along, I would expect implementation shortly.

Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90798 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

At some point you have to let people make their own decisions.
Only if they select the correct decision according to the government.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 4:47 am to
quote:

Most schools couldn't even afford to have a scoreboard without coke



So the frick what???? Seriously....what difference would it make??? Here's an idea...maybe...just maybe...local businesses would have a chance to do some advertising at the games when Coke is no longer around.


But hey, I see the point...the tyranny of government is all over us...the man has his foot on our neck dammit. Why limit advertising to just Coke? Why shouldn't Jim Beam or the local selazy porn theater be allowed to place their ads all over schools also? I can easily see a community warmly embracing the local Asian Rub and Tug joint when they foot the bill for the new message sign in front of the local high scholl replete with an image of the school mascot and the King Asian Spa logo....
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90798 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:12 am to
quote:

So the frick what???? Seriously....what difference would it make??? Here's an idea...maybe...just maybe...local businesses would have a chance to do some advertising at the games when Coke is no longer around.
The local distributor does it not big old mean Coke, you always got picked last in gym class didn't you
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9794 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:29 am to
The Barack Obama Administration.

The Gladys Kravitz Presidency.
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:33 am to
Yeah let's focus on advertisers and not the fact a large portion in the school can't read the dam promotions.

You got to be kidding me.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55375 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:37 am to
But Nancy Reagan just say no was ok? People loved that then
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:45 am to
So germandawg the next logical step would be to ban food stamp users from buying sugary drinks, right?
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
32184 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:48 am to
quote:

So germandawg the next logical step would be to ban food stamp users from buying sugary drinks, right?



Or perhaps FLOTUS could weigh in and crack down on food stamps and welfare being used to buy weed in Colorado.
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:48 am to
Didn't know the cartels were buying advertisement and legal?
Didn't know just say no cost the schools revenues.
But carry on with your strawman!

If that's the best you got, it confirms you are losing.
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 6:50 am to
The schools gets to decide what advertisers they want. The school that should be run by the community, not the federal gov.

Why are progressive just pro choice when it comes to abortion?
This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 6:52 am
Posted by geauxturbo
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
4445 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 7:47 am to
Wait, I thought banning toys in boxes of suggary cereal and banning ads during Saturday morning cartoons was supposed to fix the fat kid problem?

That didn't work? There are MORE fat kids than before? WHAT THE F**K? This will work. I know it!!!!
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90798 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 7:48 am to
These people crack me up.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Ummmm, I don't recall the First Lady receiving a single vote from any citizen. How in the hell can she simply decree that anything be done?


Well shite, our next president is liable to be someone for whom that is her major claim to fame.

and "Just Say No" was a little sidelight ad campaign, big difference between that and government edicts like you are Madame Mao or something
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90798 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 7:57 am to
quote:

quote:


Ummmm, I don't recall the First Lady receiving a single vote from any citizen. How in the hell can she simply decree that anything be done?




Well shite, our next president is liable to be someone for whom that is her major claim to fame.

and "Just Say No" was a little sidelight ad campaign, big difference between that and government edicts like you are Madame Mao or something
I didn't make the qoute you linked to me.
Posted by ASTL
In a cubicle
Member since Jan 2014
757 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 8:00 am to
Progressives are only pro choice on issues they like. Pro choice on abortion but not on your right to a fire arm or right to buy or consume certain foods.


frick that
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138933 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 8:02 am to
This is what happens when famous, wannabe politician women have nothing to do.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55375 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 8:13 am to
Conservatives are for smaller government intrusion into peoples lives till they want to invade your bed room and tell women they can't have abortions.

Any thread that says FLOTUS POTUS whatever cannot be taken seriously. First Lady President Wow real words it can be done

When Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush had their pet projects I guess that was OK?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram