- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:07 pm to Flats
I think the terminology is confusing. It's a mandate in the sense that it's a legal eligibility requirement for participating in a public communal setting (e.g. you wouldn't be ineligible for online school, but would be ineligible if you gather with others in meat space). The fact that you have other options for these services make it a less serious situation than compulsory vaccination with penalties that deprive you over liberty (incarcerate you).
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:11 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I think the terminology is confusing
Perhaps for you.
As for the rest, you’re actually comparing the negative consequence of not being able to attend the school you’d like to attend to the negative consequence of paying for your own food instead of expecting your fellow citizens to pay for it. That is SDV level stupid.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:21 pm to Flats
I guess we disagree, but an incarceration restricts me to a penal facility.
A mandate just makes me ineligible to participate in some educational venues while still being able to select others.
It is restrictive, though. I agree there.
But I think it's justified. Otherwise, families may be practically forced to opt out of some school settings because their medical conditions prevent them from being safely vaccinated themselves. The move to no mandates moves people like Rhett Krawitt, a then-7-year-old with leukemia from going to school with other students (he was an activist for a California prop on this that helped keep vaccination rates sufficiently high for such kids to stay safely enrolled).
A mandate just makes me ineligible to participate in some educational venues while still being able to select others.
It is restrictive, though. I agree there.
But I think it's justified. Otherwise, families may be practically forced to opt out of some school settings because their medical conditions prevent them from being safely vaccinated themselves. The move to no mandates moves people like Rhett Krawitt, a then-7-year-old with leukemia from going to school with other students (he was an activist for a California prop on this that helped keep vaccination rates sufficiently high for such kids to stay safely enrolled).
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:22 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
he was an activist for a California prop on this).
No he wasn’t. He was a forced actor.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:24 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
But I think it's justified.
I do as well, but not because it saves money.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:31 pm to roadGator
I'm sure it was his dad's idea. They were on the Slate What's Next Podcast in July. He hasn't changed his views as a 17 year-old, btw.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:32 pm to Flats
I brought up finances because I thought it would be compelling on this board that loves to complain about their resources going to others' preventable harms. I agree that there are other arguments as least as good.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:37 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I agree that there are other arguments as least as good.
It’s not really a good one at all. I’ve given several examples of ways to save money on health care that no sane person wants to implement.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:45 pm to Flats
yeah, I'd say it's not sufficient and I maybe should've said so earlier. Otherwise, you're right, you could end up with some absurd policies, but I don't think it's wrong to include it on a list of reasons to buck up vaccine mandates.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:47 pm to Flats
quote:
It’s not really a good one at all. I’ve given several examples of ways to save money on health care that no sane person wants to implement.
And avoided discussing using vaccines as a low-cost way of saving money on infectious diseases because you can't get past the variable efficacy of the influenza vaccine.
That reminded me of a possible method of undermining the anti-vax retards, by pointing out that pharmaceuticals stand to make much more money in the utopia of anti-vax than they do in a world where vaccines are mandated.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:50 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
a low-cost way of saving money on infectious diseases
yes - this matters and is worth emphasizing. Vaccine rates falling will lead us to spend a LOT more money on infectious disease that we can't spend elsewhere. Everybody is rightly jazzed by MAHA's goals of tackling chronic diseases better. You can't really do that by producing a lot more chronic disease and massively overspending on the preventable parts of it.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:53 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
And avoided discussing using vaccines as a low-cost way of saving money on infectious diseases
You cannot be this stupid. I don’t CARE if it saves money.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:59 pm to Flats
quote:
You cannot be this stupid. I don’t CARE if it saves money.
A prevention that also saves money and resources for other important things is definitely a good argument for a vaccine mandate.
Thank god that our forefathers had vision you clearly did not. Maybe we would be spared the nonsense of your 'critical thinking' in the anti-vax world though.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:22 pm to TigerDoc
Children are very impressionable.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:24 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Maybe we would be spared the nonsense
Now do your Covid advice, Mr Expert. Or tell us how the medical community gives out millions of flu shots that, according to you, aren’t effective.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:29 pm to Flats
quote:
Now do your Covid advice, Mr Expert. Or tell us how the medical community gives out millions of flu shots that, according to you, aren’t effective.
Yeah, maybe we should invoke your 'maybe we shouldn't trust the pathology' nonsense. My COVID advice was definitely beyond your paygrade, especially if you can't understand why the flu vaccine is not particularly efficacious.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:33 pm to Flats
The flu shot isn’t always effective as it’s predicting the most likely strains for the upcoming season. At best it’s a guess around 40-60% match. It also doesn’t take into account for mutations.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:37 pm to JKeller34
yes, plus the timing of the flu schedule is terrible relative to the school schedule. They'd end up making a worse prediction to get kids to have it on time.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:39 pm to SallysHuman
quote:Yes. But it's always impossible to account for how retarded people will twist something. You certainly can't revolve decision making based upon it.
I worry that statements such as these can be twisted by the alphabet fairies to excuse and promote "gender affirmation".
Popular
Back to top



1



