- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: First time in us history not a single Dem will vote for a tax cut
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Expanded child care credits, cuts middle class taxes by an average of 2500 dollars
So just two components, one with a sunset on it after which that same middle class sees a tax increase?
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:43 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
It's amazing how dems want bi-partisan cooperation now that they are not in power. Go suck a railroad spike. Elections have consequences.
Lol, congrats for completely misinterpreting my post. All I'm pointing out is that you aren't going to get bipartisan support for a bill that was intentionally crafted without input from the other party. That goes for both Democrats and Republicans. To expect a different outcome is silly.
This post was edited on 12/19/17 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:44 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
Can't believe the arrogance and stupidity of Obama back when he put on those fake tears, thinking his faux emotions were going to convince a nation to abandon the 2nd Amendment.
'omagosh did you see obama cry?'
'yeah, it was like, so moving'
'i took all my guns to the police station today.'
'me too.'
'there will never, like, be suffering ever.'
'obama is just so smart.'
'omagosh did you see obama cry?'
'yeah, it was like, so moving'
'i took all my guns to the police station today.'
'me too.'
'there will never, like, be suffering ever.'
'obama is just so smart.'
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:44 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's not a tax cut, it's a tax increase on >50% of families.
Why are Republicans so gung-ho to vote for a massive tax increase all of a sudden?
(because it's not an increase for the super-rich and corporations)
Take your talking points back to DU, you fricking clown.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:44 pm to HC87
quote:
Fair statement. So have job opportunities increased? In what sectors? Have wages increased? Investments increased by the middle class?
That's a discussion we can have as the results of this bill become more apparent.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:45 pm to The Spleen
It's not a tax increase
7 years of tax cuts is worth far more than one year of taxes rising to what they were before tax cut
7 years of tax cuts is worth far more than one year of taxes rising to what they were before tax cut
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:45 pm to BamaAtl
When BamaAtl opens (his/her) mouth when they do not understand the topic at hand.


Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:49 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's not a tax cut, it's a tax increase on >50% of families.
You live in Bizzaro world where everything is opposite to reality
Up is down
Right is left
Tax cuts are increases
Obamacare is good
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:49 pm to fjlee90
Why the frick are people not paying more attention to the corporate rate? IMO that's the ONLY thing that matters.
Whoopdy-fricking-doo or boo-fricking-hoo: Some people will save $2k or will pay $2k more (roughly $40 per paycheck). I've seen those numbers being applied to "majority of middle income".
These numbers mean nothing to no one.
A reduction of 15% corp tax is HUGE and that WILL trickle down. That is inevitable.
Whoopdy-fricking-doo or boo-fricking-hoo: Some people will save $2k or will pay $2k more (roughly $40 per paycheck). I've seen those numbers being applied to "majority of middle income".
These numbers mean nothing to no one.
A reduction of 15% corp tax is HUGE and that WILL trickle down. That is inevitable.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:55 pm to Haydo
quote:
Why the frick are people not paying more attention to the corporate rate? IMO that's the ONLY thing that matters.
Correct because our companies will stop leaving the US and stop building their new plants abroad.
European countries are already complaining that our new corporate tax rate gives the US a trading advantage.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 2:55 pm to Haydo
quote:
Whoopdy-fricking-doo or boo-fricking-hoo: Some people will save $2k or will pay $2k more (roughly $40 per paycheck). I've seen those numbers being applied to "majority of middle income".
These numbers mean nothing to no one.
Uh, saving $2,000 absolutely is substantial. And many people are saving more.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:04 pm to rintintin
My point is that the corp. reduction will have a much bigger effect on the economy and individuals than the changes to the individual rate will have on individuals.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:06 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
I will give them credit, they maintain party unity no matter what.
It may cost them this time though. That will make for some very interesting 2018, 2020 political ads.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:09 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I posted this in a similar thread and this is long, but I have a theory on why not a single Dim has voted in favor of the tax overhaul at any point. There have been countless chances for at least one to vote in favor of this overhaul, but not a single vote for it by that side of the isle at any point.
We have gone round and round trying to pin down the reasons there has been a complete cold shoulder turned on this bill. I’ve seen the stereotypical reasons, but glazed right over them looking for something more concrete.
With every major change like this there are short-term failures, short-term wins, long-term failures and long-term wins. I’m now of the belief the Dims will use parts of this tax plan and the basis for their midterm assault on attempting to win power in the Senate.
Here is my example/theory: They will find a single mom, working 2 jobs, raising four children, and make her the poster child for why this tax plan is bad. They will find one of the plans perceived short-term failures and describe how it’s made this single mom’s life that much more difficult. They will grind that belief into the living rooms, they will use her face and her children’s face and claim there are countless thousands just like her across America that are hurting or fear for their future due to this ill-conceived tax plan that only helps the wealthy. They have enough media outlets in their back pocket to make this an easy task. There will be charts, pictures, testimony, data, and the best part POLLS, that show how it’s leaving behind struggling Americans and helping only the wealthy.
Winning a majority in the Senate in 2018 has been their focused goal once Trump won, they are pushing all chips forward, as all comments and actions seem to be focused in this goal. They will use this tax bill as their platform and shift the focus away from Wall Street Gains, GDP growth, etc… They know there will be some short-term failures/misses of this bill and they will focus their efforts onto those limited failures and say “I told you so, that’s why not a single one of us voted for it” … “It’s only good for the privileged few”. They will attempt to use the GOP’s most recent crowning achievement against them.
Having the majority in the Senate is the best chance they have of slowing down what they perceive to be bad for their party base. The GOP continuing to have the majority in the Senate and House, while having Trump in the WH to 2020 and beyond is the worst-case scenario for them. It starts for them by winning the Senate in 2018 and they will pull out all the stops, tug on all the heart strings they can, fabricate as many “me too” stories as they can, and the tax plans short-term perceived failures will be their basis for action, their tool to divide…
We have gone round and round trying to pin down the reasons there has been a complete cold shoulder turned on this bill. I’ve seen the stereotypical reasons, but glazed right over them looking for something more concrete.
With every major change like this there are short-term failures, short-term wins, long-term failures and long-term wins. I’m now of the belief the Dims will use parts of this tax plan and the basis for their midterm assault on attempting to win power in the Senate.
Here is my example/theory: They will find a single mom, working 2 jobs, raising four children, and make her the poster child for why this tax plan is bad. They will find one of the plans perceived short-term failures and describe how it’s made this single mom’s life that much more difficult. They will grind that belief into the living rooms, they will use her face and her children’s face and claim there are countless thousands just like her across America that are hurting or fear for their future due to this ill-conceived tax plan that only helps the wealthy. They have enough media outlets in their back pocket to make this an easy task. There will be charts, pictures, testimony, data, and the best part POLLS, that show how it’s leaving behind struggling Americans and helping only the wealthy.
Winning a majority in the Senate in 2018 has been their focused goal once Trump won, they are pushing all chips forward, as all comments and actions seem to be focused in this goal. They will use this tax bill as their platform and shift the focus away from Wall Street Gains, GDP growth, etc… They know there will be some short-term failures/misses of this bill and they will focus their efforts onto those limited failures and say “I told you so, that’s why not a single one of us voted for it” … “It’s only good for the privileged few”. They will attempt to use the GOP’s most recent crowning achievement against them.
Having the majority in the Senate is the best chance they have of slowing down what they perceive to be bad for their party base. The GOP continuing to have the majority in the Senate and House, while having Trump in the WH to 2020 and beyond is the worst-case scenario for them. It starts for them by winning the Senate in 2018 and they will pull out all the stops, tug on all the heart strings they can, fabricate as many “me too” stories as they can, and the tax plans short-term perceived failures will be their basis for action, their tool to divide…
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
That's why any calls for compromise were misguided. The Dems won't support anything GEOTUS advocates for. They are far too triggered.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:14 pm to The Spleen
quote:
one with a sunset on it
Oh for frick's sake.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Reagan knew how to build bridges. Trump doesn’t. Getting zero dem votes is as much a reflection on Trump as its is their own political point of view.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:17 pm to DEG
quote:
Getting zero dem votes is as much a reflection on Trump as its is their own political point of view.
It's a reflection of who Democrats have become. Period
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:18 pm to Haydo
quote:
A reduction of 15% corp tax is HUGE and that WILL trickle down
There's no guarantee it will actual trickle down. I do think the corporate rate was in need of reduction, and I do think pass-throughs needed a break. Outright claiming those savings will trickle down to the lower and middle class is not based on any real facts though. Big corporations are going to use those savings for stock buybacks and dividends to shareholders.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 3:19 pm to Dock Holiday
Flipping the Senate is an uphill battle for them.
The number of seats up is something like 24 for Dems and 8 for Republicans.
It means the Dems have to flip one or more seats in purple states like Nevada without losing any in red states like West Virginia and Montana.
It can be done but pretty much requires everything break their way because they are having to play so much defense this cycle.
The number of seats up is something like 24 for Dems and 8 for Republicans.
It means the Dems have to flip one or more seats in purple states like Nevada without losing any in red states like West Virginia and Montana.
It can be done but pretty much requires everything break their way because they are having to play so much defense this cycle.
Popular
Back to top


2







