Started By
Message

re: few things don't pass the smell test about the crash

Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:24 am to
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
24813 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:24 am to
quote:

1. not releasing the third name operating the helicopter.
2. ATC had one person doing 2 jobs b/c a co-worker left for the night
3. helicopter being at 400 feet when the limit was 200


Not pissing on you. I wear a tinfoil hat a lot.

1. Family doesn't want the name of their child put out because he or she made a mistake and killed 67 people. It is going to come out anyway so no reason for a coverup.

2. ATC have been short staffed ever since 911. I know a guy that was working during 911 as it happened. He worked 18 hours a day and didn't get to go home for three weeks.

3. People do things wrong that cause accidents... otherwise there would not be accidents. IDK but maybe the 400ft was because they were trying to avoid the plane. As in trying to take maneuvers (not in a panic) to take their craft out of harms way and accidentally did just the opposite.

IDK what happened I am not trying to convince anyone in either direction. My only point is it could be either and everyone here should recognize that with the facts we have that both scenarios fit.

Posted by RDOtiger
Zachary
Member since Oct 2013
1161 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:12 am to
Ahh…Thanks for clarifying!
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
5555 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

with the facts we have that both scenarios fit.



As someone in the field, this was not JUST a mistake made. This, again, was VFR weather, clear as can be, at night, when aircraft can be seen for MILES. The pilot had already radioed visual on the jet. The pilot had been cleared to land, based upon visual of the jet. This was not ATC. While they have their problems, this was completely on the Pilot....they were operating under Visual Flight Rules. This was either gross incompetence, or intentional. It wasn't just a mistake. It wasn't a congested scene. Sorry.
Posted by GrizzlyAlloy
Member since Aug 2020
2581 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:29 am to
I love a good conspiracy, but yall are making way to much of this.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
16782 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:33 am to
quote:

not releasing the third name operating the helicopter.
2. ATC had one person doing 2 jobs b/c a co-worker left for the night
3. helicopter being at 400 feet when the limit was 200


I think what we’ll find is a chain of incompetence that is permeating anything and everything to do with the Federal govt is what led to this tragedy.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
65526 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:36 am to
I’ve not seen anything about a “trans pilot from a reliable source…
Posted by L1C4
The Ville
Member since Aug 2017
15395 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:51 am to
Has an official source even said there was a female onboard?
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
30807 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

This was either gross incompetence, or intentional. It wasn't just a mistake. It wasn't a congested scene. Sorry.


1000%

Anyone with any flight experience would say the same thing
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 9:00 am
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
35557 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:16 am to
Read my post. I was talking about "Jo", the trans UH-60 pilot from the VA AR who was wrongly presented to social media as the mystery pilot, but who has since come out (so to say) revealing it's not him.
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
7458 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

I watched a video that claimed to have the voice recording from ATC. The controller asked the helicopter crew if they “had a visual on the CRJ.” That’s it. The controller didn’t clarify by stating “incoming.” There was another outgoing flight that the crew misidentified as the CRJ. Not sure if this is true, but if it is, then this points to failures by the military, the helo crew, and ATC.


Watch the video. The helo had clear view of both planes, landing lights on, from a MILE out. You have a huge field of view from that distance, you couldn’t NOT see BOTH planes in their field of view. Clear night sky in the background.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
13122 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:11 am to
quote:

I think what we’ll find is a chain of incompetence that is permeating anything and everything to do with the Federal govt is what led to this tragedy.


A very likely scenario Chewy.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
13122 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Read my post. I was talking about "Jo", the trans UH-60 pilot from the VA AR who was wrongly presented to social media as the mystery pilot, but who has since come out (so to say) revealing it's not him.


You know the rules.



Most of you "wood".
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
35557 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:21 am to
quote:

You know the rules


Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
13122 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:25 am to
Posted by Nolalakeview
Member since Feb 2015
1865 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:50 am to
quote:

A transgender helicopter pilot was forced to respond after she was falsely identified as the captain of the Black Hawk that crashed in Washington, D.C.

Jo Ellis has served in the Virginia National Guard for 15 years and on Friday found herself the subject of thousands of false social media posts claiming that she was the third crew member aboard the helicopter that collided with the passenger jet, carrying 64 people.

She resorted to posting a “proof of life” video on Facebook to stop the baseless rumors.

“Jo Ellis” was trending on X on Friday morning and there were more than 90,000 posts spewing the false claims, The New York Times reports.



The Independent
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
35557 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:51 am to
OK. And?




Posted by Nolalakeview
Member since Feb 2015
1865 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:01 am to
Your previous post:

quote:

Read my post. I was talking about "Jo", the trans UH-60 pilot from the VA AR who was wrongly presented to social media as the mystery pilot, but who has since come out (so to say) revealing it's not him.


I replied to you that Jo Ellis is alive, so he was not the pilot.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
35557 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I replied to you that Jo Ellis is alive, so he was not the pilot.


I said exactly that in my post.

Posted by Nolalakeview
Member since Feb 2015
1865 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:07 am to
Yes, you did. There are still others out there that still believe it was this person.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
24813 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

This was either gross incompetence, or intentional. It wasn't just a mistake. It wasn't a congested scene. Sorry.


You just said what I said. It could be intentional, it could be an accident. Your post is an attempt at proving me wrong and you quote above is exactly what I was saying.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram