- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal court rules Noem terminating temporary status for Venezuelans in US was illegal
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:56 am to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:56 am to LSUTANGERINE
My personal view is
1. Trump is personally very sympathetic specifically to Venezuelans.
2. Trump just bought Venezuelan. He does not want to break what he bought by overwhelming it with returnees.
3. He will likely not push back on this too vigorously- just formally. And he will focus on other countries and felons.
1. Trump is personally very sympathetic specifically to Venezuelans.
2. Trump just bought Venezuelan. He does not want to break what he bought by overwhelming it with returnees.
3. He will likely not push back on this too vigorously- just formally. And he will focus on other countries and felons.
0
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:58 am to LSUTANGERINE
Isn't it amazing how a president can start programs like this, but another president doesn't have the authority to cancel it.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:00 am to LSUTANGERINE
Forgive my ignorance but it looks like the executive branch enacted it but now they can't take it away? Is that what it means?
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:03 am to LSUTANGERINE
But remember, ladies and germs, there's no such thing as lawfare. The self-professed most brilliant man since Leonardo da Vinci has lectured us about this repeatedly.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:04 am to BCreed1
quote:
Isn't it amazing how a president can start programs like this, but another president doesn't have the authority to cancel it.
You're not describing this correctly.
The successive President does have the authority to reverse policy, but they must follow the APA and/or the specific statute in doing so. They don't get to just wave a want to reverse properly implemented administrative policy from a prior admin if either the APA or statute requires more.
Now EOs are different.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:09 am to LSUTANGERINE
9th circuit… LOL
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:11 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
she ended temporary protected status (TPS) for Venezuelans under the Biden-era Venezuela TPS designations,
So the Biden admins had the authority to give them TPS but Trump admin doesn’t have authority to remove it? What kind of clown world shite is this
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:11 am to LSUTANGERINE
Congrats.
Huge win for you people
Huge win for you people
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:12 am to Laugh More
quote:
Why do you people keep falling for federal court rulings only to have them overturned ALMOST EVERY SINGLE TIME?!
That’s just cuz muh SCOTUS is MAGA!!! REEEE!!!
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:28 am to deltaland
quote:
So the Biden admins had the authority to give them TPS but Trump admin doesn’t have authority to remove it? What kind of clown world shite is this
Doing a very fast skim of the ruling, it seems to be more down to TPS status being statutorily created for a period of time (I think it's 18 months). Nothing prevents the admin from non-renewing their status once the applicable time period ends, but there is nothing in the statute giving an admin the authority to revoke the status once granted.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 10:29 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:31 am to deltaland
quote:
So the Biden admins had the authority to give them TPS but Trump admin doesn’t have authority to remove it?
Pretty much. Not at this time.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 10:32 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:32 am to LSUTANGERINE
So it’s ok for Biden to start this shite but Trump can’t stop it?
Elections have consequences. Trump was voted in to, among other things, actually enforce the immigration laws that the Dems just ignored. And then these judges can stop him from doing that?
This shite has to end one way or another.
Elections have consequences. Trump was voted in to, among other things, actually enforce the immigration laws that the Dems just ignored. And then these judges can stop him from doing that?
This shite has to end one way or another.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Nobody gives a damn about your opinion.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:36 am to roadGator
quote:
Huge win for you people
It is. It shows that the rule of the law can be upheld and the current administration will be taken to task when they break it.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:36 am to LSUTANGERINE
So, this just creates a certainty of the SCOTUS overruling yet another 9CCA decision. I'm not butthurt. It'll work out, and their decision will simply be ignored until SCOTUS rules.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:36 am to BCreed1
quote:
Nobody gives a damn about your opinion.
You should.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:37 am to Pax Regis
quote:
Trump was voted in to, among other things, actually enforce the immigration laws that the Dems just ignored. And then these judges can stop him from doing that?
I agree with the first part. I am pro legal deportation of undocumented immigrants. I am opposed to illegal deportation.
If the Supreme Court overturns it, then bon voyage.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 10:39 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 11:13 am to LSUTANGERINE
No, it was illegal that Biden granted status. Noem is right.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 11:41 am to LSUTANGERINE
Or does it show the bias of radical left judges?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News