- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal Communications Commission set to reverse net neutrality rules
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:19 pm to Breesus
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:19 pm to Breesus
quote:
"might"? They were literally caught doing it, sued for it,
So the issue was fixed?
quote:
All internet traffic should he treated the same.
I agree with this, but the key word is should. I'm not for telling a company what they can and cannot offer, but I would be for telling a company that if they choose to throttle, prioritize, suppress, etc. that they have to be transparent about it.
That in and of itself would fix most of the issues. I would also include the Facebooks and Googles in this as well.
1
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:20 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
No it doesn't. That's the worst part.
I meant reversal does.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:20 pm to SLafourche07
quote:
So the issue was fixed?
Um, yes, with the implementation of Net Neutrality
quote:
would be for telling a company that if they choose to throttle, prioritize, suppress, etc. that they have to be transparent about it.
You're OK with a monopoly destroying competition within a market as long as they're open about it?
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:21 pm to junkfunky
How about everyone pays for their own ANT / RF Mod / Sys Mod / Fiber / GPS / Backhaul / Core and be your own ISP.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:22 pm to Breesus
quote:
Um, yes, with the implementation of Net Neutrality
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:23 pm to LSU316
quote:
I'll respond to that with another question. How can I innovate if I can't shape and manipulate traffic in efforts to ensure a certain current quality of service to my customers
You could do what companies in non-monopolistic settings do when rent-seeking is not an option, provide innovative ways to improve the consumer experience. Like improving network speeds, improving the customer service experience, improving response times for equipment installations and trouble shooting, trying to create interfaces on your gateway websites that make the consumer experience better.
Extorting Netflix so they pay a ransom to not get throttled, which will over the long run cost the consumer indirectly either through a reduction of content or higher prices is not consumer innovation.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:23 pm to Breesus
quote:
You're OK with a monopoly destroying competition within a market as long as they're open about it?
Local governments have harbored this for years and have been 100% open about it.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:24 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:
50_Tiger
We all get it. You're very proud of your job.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:25 pm to Breesus
quote:
Over half the country does...
I am confused. So all these counties have only one access to the Internet? Did they remove all their cell towers as well.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:27 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:
How about everyone pays for their own ANT / RF Mod / Sys Mod / Fiber / GPS / Backhaul / Core and be your own ISP.
I've seen your embarrassing posts on the tech board. You know about 5% of what you think you do.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:27 pm to tgr4ever
quote:
can someone explain to me what exactly repealing NN will do?
Steal your dog and drink your last beer.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:28 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
I am confused. So all these counties have only one access to the Internet? Did they remove all their cell towers as well.
Ah, the old data capped or bandwidth restricted wireless service is equal to uncapped broadband argument.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:28 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:
How about everyone pays for their own ANT / RF Mod / Sys Mod / Fiber / GPS / Backhaul / Core and be your own ISP.
Thats where the true innovation lies.
If you can make this affordable, you literally displace a yuge part of the industry.
I would imagine most ISPs are very afraid of this.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:29 pm to Dirtman16
quote:
Ah, the old data capped or bandwidth restricted wireless service is equal to uncapped broadband argument.
Its one of their go to plays, but don't realize how dumb it is.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:30 pm to junkfunky
quote:
I've seen your embarrassing posts on the tech board. You know about 5% of what you think you do.
I know telecom.
Just because yall listen to linus tech tips on the tech board like gospel doesnt make you 3GPP savvy nor know the entire LTE map.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:30 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Take a guess why the government didn't want that to happen?
I guess control.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:31 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Thats where the true innovation lies.
If you can make this affordable, you literally displace a yuge part of the industry.
I would imagine most ISPs are very afraid of this.
I've been begging us to restart our phone division because we pretty much own 50% of the entire network infrastructure and anything new comes from us or Erricson.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:32 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:
I know telecom
So you agree the internet is a telecom?
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:32 pm to 50_Tiger
fricking AMD fanboys are relentless
Coffee Lake has yall all up in a tizzy
Coffee Lake has yall all up in a tizzy
Posted on 12/14/17 at 12:32 pm to Aristo
quote:
I guess control.
Bingo. Title 2 gives the government, especially the controlling party, a ton of control. For something like the internet, that is awful for the consumers. Title 2 is practically the antitheses of what you want for the internet.
Page 11 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News