- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FDA must be under EXTREME pressure to remove the “emergency authorization” label.
Posted on 8/3/21 at 2:23 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 8/3/21 at 2:23 pm to GumboPot
"In the U.S., the FDA refused approval to market thalidomide, saying further studies were needed. This reduced the impact of thalidomide in U.S. patients. The refusal was largely due to pharmacologist Frances Oldham Kelsey who withstood pressure from the Richardson-Merrell Pharmaceuticals Co."
Just imagine the impact if Thalidomide had been widely available in the U.S.A.
Just imagine the impact if Thalidomide had been widely available in the U.S.A.
0
Posted on 8/3/21 at 2:41 pm to MMauler
quote:
How in the ever living f*ck are they going to remove the "emergency authorization" label and declare that these [non-vaccine] "vaccines" are perfectly safe WITHOUT lifting the unlimited f*cking IMMUNITY for both the makers and the politicians.
By just removing the EUA and fully approving it. As has been pointed out already, manufacturers have immunity from liability for the vaccines, whether EUA-only or fully approved.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 8/3/21 at 8:05 pm to shell01
quote:
Actually RobbBobb, Pfizer has already filed for the BLA for >16yr olds; the filing has been accepted and is under FDA review.
So youre saying the huge increase of breakthrough cases, wont slow the decision?
Nor the call for continuous boosters?
Posted on 8/3/21 at 8:08 pm to Jake88
Just like with Q, the next big reason to avoid vaccination will be just around the corner.
Exact same playbook of psychological manipulation.
“We’re coming up on ADE after vaccination protection wears off!!! You’ll see. Vaccinated people about to start dying off from covid!”
Trust the plan.
Exact same playbook of psychological manipulation.
“We’re coming up on ADE after vaccination protection wears off!!! You’ll see. Vaccinated people about to start dying off from covid!”
Trust the plan.
This post was edited on 8/3/21 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:06 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
So when it is approved does the "no liability" part of the emergency authorization go away?
Same question here. If you're Moderna and Pfizer maybe you don't push for it since its selling already.
Posted on 8/3/21 at 9:15 pm to Jake88
quote:then start by pointed out the falsehood that this is a vaccine
But I will point out falsehoods about the vaccine
Posted on 8/3/21 at 11:26 pm to GumboPot
I expect Pfizer will get it pretty soon. Gonna be an epic shite show once that happens with mandates everywhere you look
Posted on 8/3/21 at 11:28 pm to notsince98
quote:
Not in this country. See previous post about the national court of vaccine injuries. You cannot hold any vaccine maker liable in this country.
Exactly correct. This is not a new development, either. Vaccine manufacturers were granted immunity from liability 35 years ago, by way of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
This probably encompasses the entire lifetime of a lot of posters here, and maybe plus a few years for some.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 4:52 am to LSUA 75
(no message)
Posted on 8/4/21 at 4:55 am to LSUA 75
quote:
Drs. on the PT board assured us it was not gene therapy.
My doctor and most of the doctors in his clinic won’t go near it. They consult their patients and let make their own decisions.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 5:34 am to BeepNode
HELL NO... that ain't gonna happen, you know why,....because they all know what it's gonna do to people, why you think they are immune to liability,
Posted on 8/4/21 at 6:33 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Doing so would discredit the FDA for a long time and cause incomprehensible damage to them. They are not stupid.
So you’re saying they’re doing this the right way…
Posted on 8/4/21 at 7:10 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
mRNA technology does not change the genetic information of the cell, and is intended to be short-acting. It acts like traditional drugs that can be adjusted over time based on the dose and frequency needed.
So Moderna is saying it's a drug...not a vaccine.
Got it.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 7:17 am to DMAN1968
Oh dang you’re right, obviously we need a “food and vaccine administration” to evaluate this instead of a “food and drug”
fricking mouth breathers
fricking mouth breathers
Posted on 8/4/21 at 7:20 am to GumboPot
They can't make an "vaccine" that's only approved under the Emergency Authorization use mandatory.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 7:22 am to DMAN1968
Vaccines are drugs (or biologics...)
Posted on 8/4/21 at 7:28 am to VoxDawg
quote:
They can't make an "vaccine" that's only approved under the Emergency Authorization use mandatory.
Define 'THEY'. Currently there are many companies, corporations, city/state entities that are apparently excluded from 'THEY'. But at least some are being given a choice, the jab or termination.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 7:43 am to Tiguar
quote:
fricking mouth breathers
Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 8:02 am to shell01
quote:
Vaccines are drugs (or biologics...)
I was being a bit sarcastic...must be before everyone has had their coffee.
My first thought when I hear "vaccine" is not "intended to be short acting"and "adjusted over time based on the dose and frequency needed.".
Antibiotics, pain meds, insulin sure...but not vaccines.
Hell...even oxygen, in the medical sense, is a drug.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News