re: FDA internal memo shows at least 10 children died from the jabs.

Yeah I was criticizing the content, not the authenticity. It's poorly written.

I am confused as to how this is so confusing to so many

quote:

---

For comparison, around 175 kids from 1-17 died from/with coronavirus between 2020 and 2022.

---

Not only that, but ALL vaccines cause reactions and sometimes those reactions include death.

It always puzzled me why people would give their children multiple rounds of shots for 15 diseases that include potential side effects like anaphylaxis (potentially fatal), ITP, febrile seizures (can be fatal), Guillain-Barre (can cause paralysis), and others without blinking an eye, but all of a sudden the COVID shot is a complete non-starter (for the adults, I mean, not the kids...I get that kids had an extremely low chance of dying from COVID, so there was no reason to take the shot for kids).

It's not shocking that 10 kids out of 30,000,000 that got vaccinated died. That's how vaccines work. They always cause rare side effects in a tiny percentage of cases, but the benefit to the entire population is supposedly worth it. Kind of like airbags in cars. They can kill you, but they are more likely to save you.

It's fine with me if someone thinks the risk isn't worth the reward and doesn't do it, but it just seems very strange how people don't understand that the COVID shot is not an outlier. Statistically it performs like pretty much every other vaccine/shot. You're taking a tiny risk when you take the shot, but you're doing the same thing when you take an MMR shot or a polio shot or a flu shot.

I personally knew a guy who ended up paralyzed in a wheelchair from the flu shot. It gave him Guillain Barre. He was a tough, tough basketball coach at the local high school. Struck fear in the hearts of prospective freshmen and seasoned seniors alike. Completely paralyzed in his 50s (if I remember correctly), lived out the rest of his life from that wheelchair.

Yet people aren't afraid at all to get a flu shot, even though the risk from not taking it is similar to COVID—unless you have a compromised immune system already, it's not going to kill you.

quote:

---

Statistically it performs like pretty much every other vaccine/shot.

---

Appreciate the overall point. But no.

You’re not going to find 230 VAERS deaths for MMR over any two year period.

quote:

---

I am confused as to how this is so confusing to so many

---

this could be your sig line

quote:

---

You’re not going to find 230 VAERS deaths for MMR over any two year period.

---

Given the Controllers' dark agenda, all the vax "recipes" have all been amplified -- in a very bad way.

IF there were legit record-keeping on this and other vaxxes, they'd likely find untold hundreds if not of VAERS deaths directly or indirectly as a result of MMR alone. At least.

And this wouldn't even count the young whose life-span is now abbreviated and stunted, and health & quality of life sabotaged because of it and the rest of the insane Vax Schedule.

Drive-through post by VOR

no substance

quote:

---

Appreciate the overall point. But no.

You’re not going to find 230 VAERS deaths for MMR over any two year period.

---

I didn't just say death, I said significant adverse reactions. Thus my anecdote about Guillain Barre.

That said, when I looked up polio, here's what popped up...

Polio: "In modern times, the risk of a death from a polio vaccine is considered very low, on the order of a few cases per million doses." Over 30 million COVID vaccinated kids in the US. Using the estimation above and assuming that by "a few," that means three, that's 90 deaths a year or 180 in a two year period for 30,000,000.

And apparently, that's considered "very low." So...

And you mentioned VAERS. I know when I say this I'm going to sound like one of the conspiracy theory nuts here whose balls I regularly bust.

But I don't trust VAERS any farther than I can throw Chris Christie.

And this comes from the whole autism debate. I was in a professional position at one time around 25 years ago to be around a lot of parents with autistic children. I worked with a pediatrician who did not vaccine his own children, and who attracted every parent in a large metro area who didn't want to vaccinate because he was the only pediatrician in the metro who wouldn't kick patients out for not vaccinating. (He didn't require parents to not vaccinate either...he gave parents the information and told them to make their own informed decision).

Anyway, every one of those parents told the same story, independent of each other.

Child gets vaccinated, immediately reacts (sometimes even in the office, before leaving, sometimes within 24-48 hours), doctors deny that the vaccine had anything to do with it, call it a coincidence, and no vaccine injury is reported.

When you've personally spoken to 300 parents of autistic children and they ALL tell that story—not one time do you hear anything significantly different than that basic story with few minor variations—you kind of have to deny reality to hold onto any trust in that reporting system.

Now back then VAERS depended pretty much entirely on doctors reporting accurate information. I understand that you can report it directly online now, but I would imagine that they don't just take your word for it. I woud imagine that they fhey follow up with the doctor and s/he tells them the same thing they used to tell the parents directly. "Just a coincidence. Nothing to see here, move along."

Specifically because COVID caused a backlash (even though I don't understand why, exactly) relative to other vaccines that people take without question, I'm betting that the reported numbers are more accurate.