- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:51 am
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:51 am
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:54 am to Halftrack
So the free market will win, good deal.
Internet is not right, it is a privilege.
Keeping poor people off the Internet may be a good thing.
Internet is not right, it is a privilege.
Keeping poor people off the Internet may be a good thing.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:56 am to DarthRebel
quote:
So the free market will win, good deal.
um not really
Free markets don't restrict competition while providing substandard service and data caps.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:57 am to DarthRebel
Ok. So if you want to pay for YouTube, Facebook, Tigerdroppings, Snapchat, and all that, Bless your heart.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:58 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Free markets don't restrict competition while providing substandard service and data caps.
You clearly don't understand the term
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:02 am to ShortyRob
quote:
You clearly don't understand the term
You clearly understand how this can change the game for the internet.
Fast lanes are bad news.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:03 am to HubbaBubba
It’s true. It’s a money grab for these internet providers to get more money from popular sites. It will slow or prevent startups. Sites like Tigerdroppings will have to pay, or literally go away overnight.
Chicken will have to fork over $$$$$ or have his site slowed to where it’s not useable. So he will with give up ad money, charge us, or go out of business.
Chicken will have to fork over $$$$$ or have his site slowed to where it’s not useable. So he will with give up ad money, charge us, or go out of business.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 8:04 am
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:04 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Based Ajit Pai!
You do realize fast lanes and restricting traffic will lead to censorship, esp of publications that certain ISPs think don't agree with their political views.
Say Verizon doesn't like your boy Alex Jones. Guess what they will make his site almost unusable, or charge people more to make it accessible.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:06 am to StraightCashHomey21
Sounds like a great way to restrict information sharing and control the message the govt wants us to hear
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:09 am to jimjackandjose
Exactly. And, just think what will happen to Internet porn!
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:11 am to jimjackandjose
quote:
Sounds like a great way to restrict information sharing and control the message the govt wants us to hear
exactly
say AT&T lobbies hard for a certain party and said party is in charge. AT&T then makes the network that is pro who ever. In this case lets say FOX. FOX's website and content works fine but to use lets say CNN, customers will have to pay extra and CNN must also reach an agreement with AT8T.
Prioritizing traffic is bullshite
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 8:14 am
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:17 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
You do realize fast lanes and restricting traffic will lead to censorship, esp of publications that certain ISPs think don't agree with their political views.
The real problem here is that the internet was started as a govt monopoly, then given to a few stakeholders who will collude to force out their competitors.
Its not like the remaining competitors can create their own internet backbone for people to pay to access. The ISP market will never be a true "free market".
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 8:18 am
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:18 am to Halftrack
I don't think there has ever been a policy I am more split on, than net neutrality
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:19 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
The real problem here is that the internet was started as a govt monopoly, then given to a few stakeholders who will collude to force out their competitors. Its not like the remaining competitors can create their own internet backbone for people to pay to access. The ISP market will never be a true "free market".
Yea and overturning NN will just reinforce that. The local monopolies are bullshite.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:20 am to Halftrack
quote:
charge us
Wouldn't bother me. Would weed out a lot of pricks on here.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:23 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:yes I absolutely understand the implications. What's that got to do with my response
You clearly understand how this can change the game for the internet
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:26 am to ShortyRob
quote:
yes I absolutely understand the implications. What's that got to do with my response
Then you should know we don't have a free market with ISPs....
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:28 am to Halftrack
I guess I'll go back to reading books.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 8:29 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Wouldn't bother me. Would weed out a lot of pricks on here.
so you want an already expensive bill to sky rocket?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News