Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

FBI Might Have Ran FISA Surveillance Against Hillary

Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:33 pm
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17041 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:33 pm
Goodlatte and Gowdy asked FBI about FISA warrants on the Clinton Foundation. FBI said they'd respond in a classified letter. What's weird is the Intel committee never made it public they were requesting such info but the FBI's (public) letter in response made it clear they were. (Could someone at FBI be trying to tip off Hillary?)

So it seems that after SAP information was found on Hillary's server that someone at FBI decided to look further into it and may have sought FISA warrants to spy on the Clinton people. As you may know, FISA warrants are special and are only to be used in national security scenarios. They were originally created to catch spies and foreign agents, but since 911 they are often used on suspected terrorists.

It is clear that one does not accidentally have SAP information find it's way onto your personal server nor would it accidentally find it's way onto Weiners laptop. SAP programs are above Top-Secret. In this case it was so secret that even the DNI's IG investigator had to be "read in" before he was allowed to look at Hillary's emails. You can see his testimony on YouTube, he looked distressed even talking about it to Congress.

SAP programs are usually hidden behind codewords. In the Snowden docs several SAPs were revealed like BULLRUN which was NSAs secret program to break internet crypto. In fact, even Snowden did not have details (he only discovered the codewords and brief descriptions).

Now, secret military projects would certainly be hidden behind SAP codewords. The stealth fighter and SR-71 back in the day were almost certainly SAPs. Some of our modern fighters and drones were likely SAPs (and the design details are still likely SAP).

Is it any coincidence that China has recently unveiled a stealth fighter and an F-35 clone? They are stealing our most sensitive technology somehow and the ONLY way they can accomplish this is by someone over here being a traitor. You don't "hack" SAP data because it is not stored on Internet facing machines (if it is stored electronically at all). No, these Chinamen are paying someone over here to feed them this data. And if someone wanted to send them the data, what better way than to create your own private server and email it? Oh and if caught, just pretend it was accidental.

If it is true that the FBI has been running FiSA warrants against the Clinton Foundation, then that in itself is pretty YUGE. I see no way Goodlatte and Gowdy request such information unless they have some inkling it actually happened. It's not clear to me, though, why they'd be requesting it now.

Here's a Twitter thread explaining it:

LINK
Posted by clooneyisgod
Member since Feb 2006
7838 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:35 pm to
Just another example of the FBI trying to stop trump from winning...except the exact opposite of that
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:37 pm to
SAP secret anal probes in case y’all were wondering
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17041 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

SAP secret anal probes in case y’all were wondering


Huma took care of that for Hillary.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Just another example of the FBI trying to stop trump from winning...except the exact opposite of that






You really are pathetic.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:42 pm to
It seems that would mean there is damning evidence the espionage act was seriously violated, but the top FBI officials couldn't have that coming out because she would be finished

Sickening
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:51 pm to
This will be the FBI saying 'look we did it to her too' but it will just damn them further.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48978 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Just another example of the FBI trying to stop trump from winning...except the exact opposite of that


spin spin spin
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12949 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:55 pm to
This made up talking point was actually predicted on this board a while back.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48978 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 5:57 pm to
The timeline on their spying, if legit...which I doubt....is everything
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:08 pm to
It took them a year and a half to fabricate believable documents and angle telling that story? They're overpaid.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27935 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Just another example of the FBI trying to stop trump from winning...except the exact opposite of that

Well, except for the whole, we leaked daily that we were spying on Trump/Russia, and not one GD leak about any spying on Hillary. At All

Plus, we told the whole world we weren't gonna charge Hildebeast. Twice. But couldn't manage to even hint that we weren't investigating TheDonald

Other than that, right?
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
4179 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:22 pm to
If just a shred of this was true about Trump, they’d been screaming about it from the rooftops. Since it’s one of the deep states own, they have to hide it and protect it at all costs.

Truly pathetic.
This post was edited on 6/24/18 at 6:23 pm
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17041 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:29 pm to


There's the relevant part of the letter FBI sent Congress. It makes it clear that Congress was seeking such info:

quote:

"all documents and communications referring or relating to proposed, recommended, or actual FISA coverage of the Clinton Foundation."


I am not sure what Congress wants with this right now. It could be they are merely seeing if Hillary was treated the same as Trump (i.e. did the FBI even bother to get a FISA warrant when there was very good evidence espionage was happening with or without Hillary's knowledge).

I should perhaps revise my OP. It looks like they are looking to see IF there was a FISA warrant on the CF. There might be a number of reasons for this. It shouldn't be taken as "there was definitely a FISA warrant."
This post was edited on 6/24/18 at 6:31 pm
Posted by clooneyisgod
Member since Feb 2006
7838 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Well, except for the whole, we leaked daily that we were spying on Trump/Russia,


Before the election? Dude you're very wrong about that
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1609 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:39 pm to
I don’t disagree with you about her selling China secrets and such - she’s proven she’ll sell anything to anybody, so long as she gets her pockets lined.

However, I’m not fully on board with the idea that Gowdy & Goodlatte are suggesting the FBI used FISA on Clinton or the Clinton Foundation. I think they suspect just the opposite- that the FBI didn’t bother using FISA,(even though it was likely warranted in this case) bc they didn’t WANT to find anything. Which is the exact opposite of what they did in the case of Trump. (I also suspect they were spying on Bernie’s camp and the other Repub candidates as well during the election, but that’s another topic.)

I may be wrong, but that’s just my gut instinct. I don’t think they would go to any sort of trouble to look for anything on anybody in her circle- and certainly not going so far as to spy on them
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27935 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Before the election? Dude you're very wrong about that


quote:

Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

By Eric Lichtblau and Steven Lee Myers
Oct. 31, 2016
New York Times
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17041 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

However, I’m not fully on board with the idea that Gowdy & Goodlatte are suggesting the FBI used FISA on Clinton or the Clinton Foundation. I think they suspect just the opposite- that the FBI didn’t bother using FISA,(even though it was likely warranted in this case)


I agree and edited my post above to reflect that. This could be a situation where they want to prove negligence on the FBI's part.
Posted by LSU Wayne
Walker
Member since Apr 2005
4365 posts
Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:39 pm to
I wouldn’t put it past her sick and twisted mind to sell info under the assumed name and associated accounts, Diane Reynolds. That’s Chelsea’s alias. She would probably frick over her own family for a buck.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram