Started By
Message

re: FBI Director Wray: “These are not hoax devices”

Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:30 pm to
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

What do you call it when you do something yet have no idea wtf you are doing?
FoxMuldering
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39739 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Right. However, if he attempted to make operational bombs and just failed, then it isn't a hoax.




Correct. So back to my original point. Do you know for certain he tried to make them operational bombs?

If not, then you're no better than the "other side" saying it is a hoax. All that is known is that he made devices that looked like bombs.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108595 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

What do you call it when you do something yet have no idea wtf you are doing?
Uneducated, in over your head, dumb, foolish, etc etc
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Hoax requires intent to deceive. It's in the definition you posted.


Which is what I've been saying.

Look, here are the possibilities:

1.) Crazy guy intended to kill people and sent real bombs through the mail, which all malfunctioned.

2.) Crazy guy intended to fool people into thinking he meant to kill people and sent fake bombs through the mail.

In situation #1, the bombs aren't hoaxes.

In situation #2, they are hoaxes.

What I said in my first post and have maintained throughout this thread is that IF situation #2 is the truth (that has yet to be determined), then the bombs are indeed hoaxes.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

So you think making a working bomb is as simple as mailing a letter?


No, he put a lot of effort into a elaborate plan of who and how to mail these thing, but no effort into making a functional bomb, and no effort to maximize the chance they would actually be delivered. To quote the NYPD bomb squad tech "the first clue that a bomb is a hoax is it looks like a bomb!"
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39739 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

It is not logically debatable at this point


It is holding on to a crazy idea that the FBI is lying to America in on a giant conspiracy with the democrats to make Trump look bad


Its almost as dumb as saying Trump wants to kill all gays and blacks


So, the FBI has released his intent? That's interesting.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Correct. So back to my original point. Do you know for certain he tried to make them operational bombs?
I do not. I was weighing in in thirds incorrect definition of hoax.

quote:

If not, then you're no better than the "other side" saying it is a hoax.
in what way?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108595 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

If not, then you're no better than the "other side" saying it is a hoax.
Yes I am, because I am actually going with the words the fricking FBI said as they gave their official statement


My side takes no mental gymnastics and conspiracy theories
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108595 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

So, the FBI has released his intent? T
They released saying "it isnt a hoax", so yes, they released his intent.....
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:32 pm to
quote:


It is holding on to a crazy idea that the FBI is lying to America in on a giant conspiracy with the democrats to make Trump look bad


I've never said this. I was one of the ones in the Shapiro thread saying it was stupid for people on the right to knee-jerk to the "false flag" explanation with zero evidence to show for it.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39739 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

What I said in my first post and have maintained throughout this thread is that IF situation #2 is the truth (that has yet to be determined), then the bombs are indeed hoaxes.



I don't get how this is so hard for them.


Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86493 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

For it to be a hoax, it has to be that he made a knowing deliberate attempt for these devices not to work and to only fool people

Isn't that what he did?
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
14454 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:33 pm to
They were hoax devices and were inoperable. Wray said what he said in the event another pops up, he wants it treated as real just as a precaution.
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79265 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:34 pm to
It’s not a lie if you believe it...
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I am actually going with the words the fricking FBI said as they gave their official statement



If point #2 in my earlier post is correct, then the FBI used the wrong word, by definition. They aren't infallible, I think both sides of the aisle can agree on that point
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108595 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

What I said in my first post and have maintained throughout this thread is that IF situation #2 is the truth (that has yet to be determined), then the bombs are indeed hoaxes.

That is not what you have been saying


quote:

So.....they ALL malfunctioned? They were all real bombs that didn't work? I'm NOT saying that it's any better to send fake bombs or real bombs through the mail, but if they were the former, then they are hoaxes, by definition.
quote:

If they were real bombs, then they weren't hoaxes. If they weren't, then they were hoaxes. Period.
You were saying if the bombs are fake, then they are a hoax. Period.


Which is not true
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 3:35 pm
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

quote:

If he tried to make these devices actually explode, they arent a hoax by definition



If they were real bombs, then they weren't hoaxes. If they weren't, then they were hoaxes. Period.
This is what you said and it is false. He could have attempted to make a real bomb and unwittingly failed. It is not a hoax simply because he tried and failed to make a real bomb.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94811 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

If the bombs weren't real, then they were successful hoaxes, by definition.


That's what I'm talm bout - the unvarnished truth.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108595 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Isn't that what he did?
According to the FBI, no


Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108595 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

I don't get how this is so hard for them.
You cant be serious right now


first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram