
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fauci wrote the playbook.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:06 pm
Republican witnesses to all Congressional hearings should use it. Just plead the 5th amendment to EVERY question. Fauci established the precedent.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 10:22 pm to BFIV
Something something (D)ifferent
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:21 am to BFIV
They can plea the fifth, use the standard “I don’t recall”, or the classic “it depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.”
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:23 am to BFIV
If you want to change the behavior of dems, simply mimic their behavior when confronted by dems.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:31 am to Placekicker
quote:
They can plea the fifth, use the standard “I don’t recall”, or the classic “it depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.”
Monica said that was a tough Bill to swallow.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:35 am to BFIV
Fauci was Trump’s guy at the head of NIAID. Trump only hires the best.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 6:36 am
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:37 am to BFIV
quote:
Fauci established the precedent.
You think Fauci established the precedent of taking the 5th at Congressional hearings?
Really?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 6:40 am to BFIV
slowpro will be here shortly to tell you that they cant because they aren't receiving threats of prosecution from st. ag's or local district attorneys. as if the lefties haven't been campaigning on get trump for years 
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:18 am to SlowFlowPro
Someone missed the mob hearings of the 1950s and 60s
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:20 am to Fanatics
quote:
slowpro will be here shortly to tell you that they cant because they aren't receiving threats of prosecution from st. ag's or local district attorneys. as if the lefties haven't been campaigning on get trump for years
Dude is so ravaged with TDS… he cannot wait to come here every day, all day, and defend the left… But he’s totally conservative, y’all!
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You think Fauci established the precedent of taking the 5th at Congressional hearings?
Really?
When they're already pardoned*
Also, I wouldn't expect the person who doesn't understand the purpose behind double jeopardy to have the mental hardware to be involved in this conversation. Why don't you sit this one out?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:26 am to BFIV
Doesn't really matter if they even show up since the DOJ won't prosecute anyone for ignoring Congress. However in 28 once Dems control the WH its gonna be a literal bloodbath if the left gets its way
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:28 am to Azkiger
quote:
I wouldn't expect the person who doesn't understand the purpose behind double jeopardy to have the mental hardware to be involved in this conversation. Why don't you sit this one out?
Double Jeopardy has nothing to do with Congressional hearings.
Until you can explain that nexus, it's just a lol
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:28 am to Azkiger
quote:
When they're already pardoned*
Where is "pardon" in OP?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Double Jeopardy has nothing to do with Congressional hearings.
It has to do with lawfare you retard.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where is "pardon" in OP?
OP didn't mention limp wristed retards yet here you are.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:30 am to Azkiger
quote:
OP didn't mention limp wristed retards yet here you are.

Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:31 am to Azkiger
quote:
It has to do with lawfare you retard.
So lawfare has nothing to do with Congressional hearings?
This is a thread specifically about Congressional hearings. Why are you melting about irrelevancies (again)?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So lawfare has nothing to do with Congressional hearings?
Double jeopardy proves lawfare exists.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:36 am to Azkiger
quote:
Double jeopardy proves lawfare exists.
You really have to stretch the definition of "lawfare" to make this work.
You do you.
That's just proving my point about lawfare, though.

Popular
Back to top

8








