- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Explain what caused the towers to collspse.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 12:57 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 9/12/22 at 12:57 pm to Indefatigable
Flight 175's engine on display:
Another engine portion on the street:
For whatever reason, I cannot get the images from the pentagon into this post. All you have to do is google "Flight 77 engine parts" and there are multiple contemporaneous pictures of parts in the Pentagon wreckage.
On to Flight 93, your next and last pivot. Low and behold, a buried engine at the crash site:
Another engine portion on the street:
For whatever reason, I cannot get the images from the pentagon into this post. All you have to do is google "Flight 77 engine parts" and there are multiple contemporaneous pictures of parts in the Pentagon wreckage.
On to Flight 93, your next and last pivot. Low and behold, a buried engine at the crash site:
This post was edited on 9/12/22 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:00 pm to dr
quote:
the day of the "event" no engines in the destruction pics
all locations
but, hey they found passports unburned, so anything is possible, I guess
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:37 pm to Indefatigable
engine specs
rotors in a stack in the dirt, that moments later were spinning at 10's of thousands of rpm
ever been around on of those being rebuilt?
nope, not buying it,
and the day it happened I was finding any pic possible
amazing how many new photos were edited 1-3 days later, only to have the originals disappear
believe what you want,
the greatest loss on 9/11 were truth and freedoms
rotors in a stack in the dirt, that moments later were spinning at 10's of thousands of rpm
ever been around on of those being rebuilt?
nope, not buying it,
and the day it happened I was finding any pic possible
amazing how many new photos were edited 1-3 days later, only to have the originals disappear
believe what you want,
the greatest loss on 9/11 were truth and freedoms
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:39 pm to Nurbis
so how big do you think the street sign is?
ge engine specs
carcass seems small to me, and amazingly no rotors tried to exit?
ge engine specs
carcass seems small to me, and amazingly no rotors tried to exit?
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:40 pm to AtticusOSullivan
I know of a high rise apartment building that had a fire in one of its middle floors. The whole building was condemned because the steel I-beams were twisted badly. There was no jet fuel, just normal furniture and household stuff that burned.
Steel melts. That's how the I-beams are made.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:40 pm to dr
Got it. So even though there are contemporaneous pictures, even though there are tons of parts recovered from all ten engines, even though some of those parts (including one substantially “intact” engine) are available to view for the public, and even though all of the above has been examined by no less than 10 separate governmental and independent analyses, YOU think it’s all fake.
Got it. You seem reasonable.
Got it. You seem reasonable.
This post was edited on 9/12/22 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:41 pm to dr
quote:
amazing how many new photos were edited 1-3 days later,
Funny, a few minutes ago you thought there was no proof.
Now there's proof, but its fake?
You've made up your mind.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:42 pm to dr
quote:
rotors in a stack in the dirt, that moments later were spinning at 10's of thousands of rpm
I'm not getting where the confusion lies here or what your insinuation possibly could be. It fell to the ground and was buried under a pile of rubble 45 minutes later. The alternate theory here is?
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:42 pm to dr
Why are you posting GE engine specs when Flight 175 had Pratt and Whitney engines?
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:43 pm to dr
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:45 pm to dr
quote:
rotors in a stack in the dirt, that moments later were spinning at 10's of thousands of rpm
I don’t even understand what this is supposed to mean. Most of Flight 93 was totally obliterated on impact. Besides the tail, most of what was recovered was to some degree buried in the dirt or dispersed in a line many yards away along the planes flight axis.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:46 pm to Indefatigable
because they are generally interchangable
GE/PW/RR all owned serviced in Houston by RWG
but you knew that right,
right???
GE/PW/RR all owned serviced in Houston by RWG
but you knew that right,
right???
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:47 pm to dr
Correct. I just don’t know why you’d intentionally post a different model engine regardless of what the corporate management structure was or where anything was serviced.
Are you saying that every photo in this thread is fake? The City of New York just dropped that partial engine on the sidewalk using the collapse of the towers as a distraction?
Are you saying that every photo in this thread is fake? The City of New York just dropped that partial engine on the sidewalk using the collapse of the towers as a distraction?
This post was edited on 9/12/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:49 pm to Indefatigable
those are the inner rotors,
and if not inside the housing they would not be stacked in a stack because moments before they were spinning at 20K rpm, and making 40,000 lbs of thrust
and if not inside the housing they would not be stacked in a stack because moments before they were spinning at 20K rpm, and making 40,000 lbs of thrust
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:50 pm to dr
quote:
because moments before they were spinning at 20K rpm, and making 40,000 lbs of thrust
What exactly are you expecting them to do or go? 93 hit the ground inverted on a pretty steep angle. Most of the aircraft was immediately several feet into the dirt.
They also found engine parts a couple hundred yards forward of the crash site, but I could not find a good picture from the same day.
This post was edited on 9/12/22 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:50 pm to Indefatigable
the inner core is the engine, and they are all the same, its the outside config that changes depending upon aircraft or power plant install,
and size of outside driven rotors
and size of outside driven rotors
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:50 pm to AtticusOSullivan
Sure are a bunch of "grassy knoll" folks in this thread.
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:52 pm to dr
So what exactly is your point here in this thread?
That everything and everyone is wrong, and there were no airplanes?
Just state your conclusion. Or are you one of those “I’m just asking questions, I don’t know the truth” people?
That everything and everyone is wrong, and there were no airplanes?
Just state your conclusion. Or are you one of those “I’m just asking questions, I don’t know the truth” people?
This post was edited on 9/12/22 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 9/12/22 at 1:56 pm to AtticusOSullivan
Um, the heat weakened the steel, causing the upper floors to collapse and pancake the rest of the structure.
Popular
Back to top


1




