- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: EPSTEIN FILES: PHASE 1 is OUT!
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
All the influencers.
Which influencer should get it?
Rachel Maddow?
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:31 pm to TigerNAtux
Probably, but i would think it doesn't matter how long, if they haven't pursued prosecution yet. If you release it all, every bit of it, and then try to prosecute, I'd imagine any case would possibly be thrown out due to tainting the jury pool?
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:31 pm to Miner
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:31 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Which influencer should get it?
Every influencer falls within the population of earth, so all of them.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:32 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Which influencer should get it?
Zero. Influencers are fake and phony
It needs to be directly released to the public. Influencers are paid to craft narratives, a halfway intelligent human doesnt need them.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Unless you have a name. Would you please just STFU you obfuscsting PoS.
We arent here to argue with you.
We arent here to argue with you.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:32 pm to hawgfaninc
Those are flight logs I think, that have already been released a long time ago.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I haven’t followed this as closely as some. But I wasn’t aware there were currently any cases being prosecuted in relation to this. G. Maxwell was the last and only I knew of.
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:34 pm to Miner
quote:
I'd imagine any case would possibly be thrown out due to tainting the jury pool?
Naw it's not that. The prosecuting body could do it, but they don't. You're giving the defendants the ability to talk to witnesses, create defenses, etc. without the rules of a formal proceeding. As long as they avoid criminal behavior (like obstruction of justice) they get a leg up on their defense. It's "revealing their hand" so to speak. A strategical choice.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:34 pm to TigerNAtux
quote:
G. Maxwell was the last and only I knew of.
That's the last one any of us know of.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:35 pm to BCreed1
DJT should have never promised to release the Epstein files or the JFK evidence. It’s just more head fakes, and frankly bs.
AG Bondi told Waters last night they were in possession of the files and there would be a release to the public. Today, the FBI is playing hardball. So which is it?
AG Bondi told Waters last night they were in possession of the files and there would be a release to the public. Today, the FBI is playing hardball. So which is it?
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:36 pm to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
So which is it?

This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:37 pm to BugAC
quote:
You really don't know who those people are then or what they post, do you? It's ok if you don't, and if you are unaware then i can understand why you post this. Libs of ticktock, for example, is an account that just reposts the things that the crazy liberals post on the internet. I don't know if i'd consider that an "influencer" or just an informative alt news site focused on strange and disturbing liberal behavior.
There's said to be about 10M followers among the invited folks today. That's not a small amount.
Hell, it's probably more than CNN gets for viewers in a month.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
Okay so you are so saying they won’t release documents that “may” be used in any future prosecutions?
If that’s the case they should have never touted any release.
Hmmm…
If that’s the case they should have never touted any release.
Hmmm…
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:38 pm to hawgfaninc
Line 100 - ..... Bill Clinton....
Line 101 - Same As Above
Line 102 - Same As Above
Line 103 - Same As Above
So that is pretty damning..
Line 101 - Same As Above
Line 102 - Same As Above
Line 103 - Same As Above
So that is pretty damning..
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:38 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Which influencer should get it?
Why should any retard influencer get it?
Just upload them for everyone.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:38 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
There's said to be about 10M followers among the invited folks today. That's not a small amount.
Hell, it's probably more than CNN gets for viewers in a month.
What's a larger number:
a. Their followers
b. The population of Earth.
I think B has to be comfortably in the lead.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:39 pm to TigerNAtux
quote:
that “may” be used in any future prosecutions?
Technically, I said "ongoing"
quote:
If that’s the case they should have never touted any release.
The "investigation" excuse has been the main one why they haven't been. Then it was "protecting the victims". Now it's "SDNY FBI office stole them all"
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:39 pm to BluegrassCardinal
quote:yeah or wait until you have everything on your desk first before announcing anything.
DJT should have never promised to release the Epstein files or the JFK evidence. It’s just more head fakes, and frankly bs.
quote:same. don't just assume because someone dropped a tome off on your desk that it means anything. i would have hoped she would have someone read through it first before opening her mouth.
AG Bondi told Waters last night they were in possession of the files and there would be a release to the public. Today, the FBI is playing hardball. So which is it?
this is all leaving a bad taste in my mouth.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
This isn’t a FOIA request. They are exempt from FOIA requests. It doesn’t prejudice anyone if they were already used in another criminal proceeding. It would prejudice the DOJ if any and they are the ones wanting to release the records.
Popular
Back to top


3









