- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elon Musk Reveals Treasury Has Been Auto-Paying Everyone, Including Terrorist Groups
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:57 pm to SquatchDawg
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:57 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Pays for importing illegal aliens
You were so close.
0
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:58 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
After having AI read your post history, it spit this image out as the most likely physical appearance of the author.
The best you can do is copy my insult? Not only are you melting like an idiot, and dumb as a rock, but you're also unoriginal. Going to be a long four years for you buddy.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:59 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
jesus. get a hobby homie. it’s a beautiful day outside
very typical cognitive dissonance response
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:59 pm to Draconian Sanctions
You’re projecting again DC
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:59 pm to Smeg
quote:
Not only are you melting like an idiot, and dumb as a rock, but you're also unoriginal.
you’re projecting again
quote:
Going to be a long four years for you buddy.
why?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:00 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
How so?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
#1 It it’s not treasury’s role to “deny” payments instructed by Congress. That would be wildly unconstitutional
That simply isn't true. How.monies are disbursed and questioning whether recipients qualify according to legislative provisions is precisely their job. Not just them but they do play a role in that.process. they are not being paid 500k a year to rubber stamp documents. Use SOME common sense.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
very typical cognitive dissonance response
but 100% accurate. touch grass.
“OMB” we get it
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:05 pm to McChowder
quote:
That simply isn't true.
It absolutely is true 99% of the time. It would be unconstitutional for treasury as the exec branch to frustrate leg branch appropriations under train vs nyc.
there as some very limited circumstances when you would be correct and in those very limited situations i would agree with you but would also say we need more evidence than Elon’s word.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
we need more evidence than Elon’s word.
Yeah. Instead, we should just trust the Treasury Department completely.
Ridiculous.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:09 pm to Klark Kent
so you can’t actually respond on the merits.
go play in traffic while the adults talk
go play in traffic while the adults talk
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:10 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Yeah. Instead, we should just trust the Treasury Department completely. Ridiculous.
nothing possible in between?
i’m totally open to questioning treasury or any department but there’s a way to do it that’s constitutional and there’s a way to do it that isn’t.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:10 pm to John Barron
What. I want to know is, will people be arrested for this shite and when?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:11 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
The Foreign Relations Authorization Act 2003 was passed for one year of funding but after the act expired and not reapproved they kept paying without congress approval.
and was funding for same authorized through other means?
You asked for proof, he provided proof.
Why do you want to slide the goalposts over to keep your misguided disbelief relevant?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:13 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:
You asked for proof, he provided proof.
He provided a wildly incomplete statement which may have some truth and may not.
Asking whether or not those appropriations where shifted to other areas is completely fair and unless you’re coming here with a full accounting of each line item the you don’t know shite.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
nothing possible in between?
Sure, but right the situation has been at one extreme for so long that the other extreme is necessary.
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:16 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Sure, but right the situation has been at one extreme for so long that the other extreme is necessary.
you do realize that comes off as ideology over constitution, right?
we have checks and balances for a reason, or does that only apply when the other political sports team is in charge?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:17 pm to Draconian Sanctions
adults who post over 1k a day on an internet forum board?
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:20 pm to Klark Kent
i think i’m more like 14 posts a day, if you want 1k a day talk to SFP
you’re also again deflecting from the merits bc you can’t respond
you’re also again deflecting from the merits bc you can’t respond
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 2/1/25 at 4:21 pm to Smeg
quote:
After having AI read your post history
I just had AI do SFP.
Page 8 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News