- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Due process” for deportations is as ridiculous as squatters rights.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:41 pm to BertyFot
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:41 pm to BertyFot
quote:
Mmm, yes- arguing that the government should follow the constitution is such a bitch move to someone who loves the president and their party more than their country.
Which section of the constitution, specifically, do you allege was violated?
You dumb frick alter. Has to be Roger, right? Nobody else is this consistently dumb.
This post was edited on 4/22/25 at 9:42 pm
1
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:42 pm to BertyFot
You idiots feigning loving the country is hilarious.
You love your progressive religion. That’s it.
But back to the point. Go do something about this great injustice or just keep being a bitch on the internet.
You don’t really care about this or you’d take action. But there’s a problem. You freaks like mommy government to handle shite and your mommy don’t get elected so you’ll just bitch and wait for mommy to come home.
Bitches. The lot of you.
You love your progressive religion. That’s it.
But back to the point. Go do something about this great injustice or just keep being a bitch on the internet.
You don’t really care about this or you’d take action. But there’s a problem. You freaks like mommy government to handle shite and your mommy don’t get elected so you’ll just bitch and wait for mommy to come home.
Bitches. The lot of you.
This post was edited on 4/22/25 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:46 pm to BBONDS25
I think you’re confused. Originally you tried to soften illegal actions by calling them improper. They are illegal. The present did an illegal (or improper as you called it) thing. So I guess you’re also saying what the president did was illegal.
Calling it a “procedural issue” doesn’t make it less serious—it is the law. The government doesn’t get to ignore court rulings just because they’re inconvenient or because “nobody’s arguing he couldn’t be removed.” The point is: he couldn’t be removed to El Salvador, and a judge said so. Again, you’re confused because you’re stupid.
Revoking visas is not the same as deporting someone from the country.
How did you know I signed up last week? And you said one of us represented someone- so by using my inference skills, it sounds like you’re claiming to be a lawyer. A very bad one.
Calling it a “procedural issue” doesn’t make it less serious—it is the law. The government doesn’t get to ignore court rulings just because they’re inconvenient or because “nobody’s arguing he couldn’t be removed.” The point is: he couldn’t be removed to El Salvador, and a judge said so. Again, you’re confused because you’re stupid.
Revoking visas is not the same as deporting someone from the country.
How did you know I signed up last week? And you said one of us represented someone- so by using my inference skills, it sounds like you’re claiming to be a lawyer. A very bad one.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:46 pm to BertyFot
quote:
That’s a direct violation of U.S. immigration law
But it’s not.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
They deported this shitstain before anyone could do anything about it. You can say it’s farcical. I’ll agree. And they won.
I have no inherent issue with their actions.
But you’re mistaken if you don’t think doing this sort of thing over and over again isn’t gumming up the agenda. It wouldn’t be difficult to just park the guy in detention while it played out. Call it stylistic preference or whatever else, but there’s value in avoiding having every single thing you do getting jammed up in court because you simply chose to do it that way. Political capital is real, and so is media influence on the electorate and by extension, the Congress.
No problem with the result here on my end. frick Maryland man. I would just like to see these things handled in a way that didn’t purposefully slow down the things I’d rather see done. The margin in the House is too thin—the fence sitters will be worn down by constant onslaught from the media, and it will end up impacting other, more important things down the road if it continues.
A little foresight and pragmatism wouldn’t hurt this administration.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:46 pm to dgnx6
It is, and you can’t prove that it’s not, and simply you saying it’s not, does not make you correct.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:47 pm to BertyFot
quote:
How did you know I signed up last week?
Another super smart radical leftist right here.
DU isn’t sending their best or are they?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:47 pm to BertyFot
Oh man you said it therefore it has to be!
Muh alter!
Muh alter!
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:48 pm to BBONDS25
It’s literally the 5th amendment.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:48 pm to Jimmy Bags
quote:
How can someone who knowingly breaks into your house illegally without your permission have rights to that house?
You can get a lot of improper leeway if you engage in fraud, which is what they usually do with fake leases. At that point it's a civil matter and police can't do anything, so you have to go through the civil eviction process. In some areas takes forever
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:48 pm to Jbird
Don’t be upset that I came prepared and you didn’t.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:48 pm to BertyFot
4/21/2025 is confusing!
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:49 pm to roadGator
So radical to follow the constitution.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:49 pm to BertyFot
Prepared to alter Roger?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:50 pm to Jbird
I’ve gathered that an alter is an alternate account that you believe I am, and that I’m Roger. Let’s say I was Roger- what have I said that’s untrue? Or do you resort to feelings over fact?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:50 pm to Jbird
Oop! Ya got me gal! Didn’t know that was a feature ??
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:50 pm to BertyFot
quote:
So radical to follow the constitution.
You have no clue what the constitution says or how it applies to this case. You dumb idiot.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:51 pm to BertyFot
Why so much effort in fake accounts?
Why hide from your past?
Why hide from your past?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:51 pm to BertyFot
quote:
INA § 235(b)(1)—is what allows expedited removal at the border without a hearing in certain cases, but that doesn’t apply to Garcia.
But Garcia did have his hearings.
They didn’t break the law.
My argument with Bush and Obama is they still used a law that violates the constitution. It doesn’t give someone in this country due process rights.
I also posted other instances their rights were violated by not having lawyers.
So we didn’t give a frick about illegals constitutional rights or their right to due process then, but some reason we care about this one case?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:51 pm to BertyFot
Like you freaks care about the constitution.
The party that wants to change it.
You freaks are hilarious. I’ll give you that.
Your hero is where he should be. Maybe a rival gang will take him out. The world would be a slightly better place.
The party that wants to change it.
You freaks are hilarious. I’ll give you that.
Your hero is where he should be. Maybe a rival gang will take him out. The world would be a slightly better place.
Page 7 of 11
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News