BertyFot

I do think there are probably some left leaning opinions that the left wishes were laws. Out of curiosity, what do you think are some left leaning beliefs that have either been proposed or codified by law and are supported universally by most liberal/democratic politicians?

Provide an article or something.

There’s no evidence he was a gang member. But even if he was, I don’t know.

He was a target of a gang. He is a citizen of El Salvador.

You did, yes. What facts would you like me to explain? Can you explicitly list them.

Yes, what claims would you like evidence for.

Facts about what?

Let me break it down for you because it’s troubling for me to accept that you might be slightly illiterate or intellectually dishonest and lazy…or both, idk.

Yes, prior hearings ordered his removal.

But a later, legally binding court decision prohibited deportation to El Salvador, the specific country he was ultimately sent to.

That’s what made his deportation a violation of due process- not because he never had hearings, but because the outcome of his most recent legal protection was ignored.

Like you’re 5:

Imagine a kid gets in trouble at school and the teacher says, “You have to go home.” That’s the first decision.

But later, the principal says, “Wait, it’s not safe for you to go home right now. You can stay here instead.”

Then, someone ignores what the principal said and sends the kid home anyway—even though they were told not to.

That’s the problem. It’s not that the kid never got in trouble. It’s that the final rule that was supposed to protect him was ignored. That’s not fair, and it breaks the rules.

Again, concerned for your level of literacy, let me break down your other misconception.

Procedure is how the law is carried out (hearings, appeals, etc.).

Due process is the constitutional right to have those procedures followed fairly and completely, and for the outcome of those procedures to be respected.

In Garcia’s case:

He did go through the proper legal process (you just don’t like it)

A judge ruled he could not be sent to El Salvador. That ruling was legally binding. When the government deported him to El Salvador anyway, it ignored the result of due process, not just the procedure itself.

Break it down a bit more:

Imagine you play a game, and there are rules everyone has to follow.

Procedure is like making sure everyone takes turns and plays the game the right way.

Due process means that not only do you follow the steps, but you also listen to the final decision—like when the referee says, “This player wins” or “This player gets to stay.”

In Garcia’s case, the referee (a judge) said, “You can’t send him to El Salvador.”

But then someone (the government under Trump) ignored that and sent him there anyway, even though the game was over and the final call was made.

That’s not just unfair, it breaks the big rule that says you have to respect the result. That’s what due process is all about.

Also, I told you I was a neuroscientist botanist and I know everything.

Social and economic. But it’s difficult to have dialogue with someone who is committed to misunderstanding.

I don’t think the government incentivizes single motherhood but I do agree that some welfare policies may have unintentionally penalized marriage, but that’s not the same as encouraging people to stay single or have more kids. I think several other factors play a role.

But…you were the one who said it was improper even though it was illegal…

Also, there is nor was there a law that opened the US border.

This is getting embarrassing for you. Are you even reading what you wrote?