- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Drag Queens exposing themselves to children good, Kirk Cameron reading to kids bad...
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:30 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:30 am
So are we to trust the judgement of the experts who think Queen Lactacia dressing in a thong and reading to 5 year olds is a GOOD thing, but a Christian reading to kids is a BAD thing?
Ya'll don't think Drag Story Hour and its supporters are nefarious and have an agenda?
Kirk Cameron is denied story-hour slot by public libraries for his new faith-based kids book
Ya'll don't think Drag Story Hour and its supporters are nefarious and have an agenda?
Kirk Cameron is denied story-hour slot by public libraries for his new faith-based kids book
10
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:34 am to oogabooga68
The libraries should probably let him read his books.
My guess is that they have concerns about violating the First Amendment, since the books have been represented as being religious, but that is easy to address. Just allow similar readings for other religious groups and for atheists.
My guess is that they have concerns about violating the First Amendment, since the books have been represented as being religious, but that is easy to address. Just allow similar readings for other religious groups and for atheists.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 11:35 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:36 am to oogabooga68
As a side note, this is completely predictable and genius marketing.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:39 am to AggieHank86
Or just feed ignorant, jackass, leftists, cowardly, no-good Dems to hungry piranhas.............
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:39 am to the808bass
quote:
As a side note, this is completely predictable and genius marketing
I was a "Metal Kid"....any album that had "the warning sticker" on it was sure to end up in my collection, but hook or by crook.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:40 am to AggieHank86
quote:
My guess is that they have concerns about violating the First Amendment,
Uhh… by denying him the opportunity to read his book to an audience?
Your like-kind situation is already happening.. the freaks are reading their garbage to kids.
Funny how you are staunchly against any limitations on freaks in skirts reading to kids….. but we really have to pull back and just reflect on someone that is not a man in a miniskirt reading their books.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:45 am to oogabooga68
quote:
So are we to trust the judgement of the experts who think Queen Lactacia dressing in a thong and reading to 5 year olds is a GOOD thing, but a Christian reading to kids is a BAD thing
Apparently Kirk needs to wear a thong while reading his books to get approval.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:54 am to AggieHank86
quote:
guess is that they have concerns about violating the First Amendment, since the books have been represented
There is no thing as separation between government and religion. Library's are public and denying Kirk is violating his First Amendment.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:54 am to BobBoucher
quote:
Apparently Kirk needs to wear a thong while reading his books to get approval.
No.....his sister on the other hand....
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
My guess is that they have concerns about violating the First Amendment,
No, idiot, these people have a gdamned agenda.
No shock that you come along with such a stupid take meant to defend these pieces of shite.
They aren't allowing Cameron the same rights as men who expose themselves to children because the people denying the request are grooming, anti-Christian garbage, NOT because of some phantom Constitutional concerns....jeebuz....
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:21 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
other religious groups and for atheists.
They're all religious groups
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:35 pm to oogabooga68
I don't like Kirk Cameron or his banana buddy Ray, but if a tranny can read to kids dressed in fetish attire I don't see why Kirk Cameron can't read to children things that are already being taught to kids across the nation in various houses of worship and are also specifically constitutionally protected.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:35 pm to Rex Feral
quote:
They're all religious groups
Yeah, and bald is a hair color.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:40 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Uhh… by denying him the opportunity to read his book to an audience?
Yeah, it was a stupid take.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:41 pm to oogabooga68
Hope he sues. This has been my stance the whole time. The hypocrisy of these people. Can't teach Biblical marriage or how it's a sin in the eyes of God, but can teach the complete opposite, knowing it goes against the beliefs of many of the kids families.
If he does sue and get money I hope he donates any money to Christian charities. Key is to put an end to the gay mafia. I'm done caring about being "PC" with these diabolical groomer POSs.
If he does sue and get money I hope he donates any money to Christian charities. Key is to put an end to the gay mafia. I'm done caring about being "PC" with these diabolical groomer POSs.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:42 pm to CleverUserName
quote:If the libraries are government-owned, there is a potential issue under the Establishment Clause.
My guess is that they have concerns about violating the First Amendment,quote:
Uhh… by denying him the opportunity to read his book to an audience?
Again, I think they should let him read.
quote:You are comparing apples to oranges, because the Drag Queen thing does not have any potential Establishment Clause implications.
Funny how you are staunchly against any limitations on freaks in skirts reading to kids
Again, I think they should let him read.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:43 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Yeah, and bald is a hair color.
Atheists cannot definitively prove or disprove their beliefs any more than a religious believer can. Atheism is as faith-based as any other spiritual belief.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:44 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If the libraries are government-owned, there is a potential issue under the Establishment Clause.
No, there isn't.
If Drag Queens are allowed, Christians are as well.
What YOU are arguing violates the Constitution, genius.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:45 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
Atheism is as faith-based as any other spiritual belief.
And in many cases, Atheists are more zealous than anyone you will meet.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:46 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:Arguably true. The bald guy would be more analogous to an agnostic. No affirmative belief either way.quote:Atheists cannot definitively prove or disprove their beliefs any more than a religious believer can. Atheism is as faith-based as any other spiritual belief.
Yeah, and bald is a hair color.
Depends upon whether you define "atheism" as "an affirmative belief that there is no god" or as "a lack of belief in a god." I have seen it defined both ways.
Since agnosticism covers "lack of belief," I tend to think of atheism as the former definition.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 12:53 pm
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News