- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dozens of missing children,some as young as just one year old rescued from sex traffickers
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:21 am to Errerrerrwere
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:21 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
"Why Gary Why?"
Not an applicable example. Sexual abuse =/= sex trafficking, and especially the sex trafficking mythology.
As far as I know, Gary Plauche never went around saying Jody was a victim of major sex trafficking ring. That was a terrible, isolated event of sexual abuse by a lone abuser (who had access to the child, which is common. See post above). The abuser got what was coming to him, too.
But that's not "sex trafficking" and to claim it is, adds to the mythology. As terrible of a situation as that was, it's not an example of sex trafficking mythology. As I said, why would I bring that up in response? As I posted earlier, why is there a need to make the actual, terrible situations something different than they are?
1
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:24 am to SlowFlowPro
This is the problem with you. You are literally arguing that trafficking children isn't abusing them. You're a fricking moron. And with that; I'm done with you.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:27 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
. You are literally arguing that trafficking children isn't abusing them.
Uh...no I'm not. That's retarded. Like really, really retarded.
Are you arguing what happened to Jody Plauche is sex trafficking? What definition are you using?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:28 am to SlowFlowPro
No. I was arguing a dad would put you down like Gary Plauche put his guy down in the Baton Rouge airport.
That's what I argued.
Now back to human trafficking isn't sexual abuse.
Go on, moron. Let the world hear this.
That's what I argued.
Now back to human trafficking isn't sexual abuse.
Go on, moron. Let the world hear this.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 7:29 am
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'll just take this opportunity to remind everyone that, by far, the largest threat of sexual abuse for children is from family, followed by associates of family.
Has anyone disputed this? I haven't.. it was in my first post to this thread.
Do children suffering at the hands and direction of the adults in their lives make it less of a problem for you?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:32 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:You are a very confused individual.
Open Your Eyes
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:32 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Has anyone disputed this?
In previous discussions on the topic it was quite common.
If you ever want to test that theory, next time this Satanic Panic-type fear mongering is posted, tell people if they want to protect their children they need to spend more time watching family than concerning themselves with strangers and see the reactions you get.
I will let you know now they won't be happy to be told that.
quote:
Do children suffering at the hands and direction of the adults in their lives make it less of a problem for you?
Where have I implied actual abuse of children isn't a problem?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'd wager most of those are runaways
Well except the 1 year old. How does a 1 year old run from Florida to Baton Rouge?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:34 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I was arguing a dad would put you down like Gary Plauche put his guy down in the Baton Rouge airport.
Then he'd go to jail for a long time for murder.
You can't always stop insane people in this world.
quote:
Now back to human trafficking isn't sexual abuse.
An argument nobody has made.
quote:
Go on, moron. Let the world hear this.
You're just asking them to listen to a straw man. An incredibly retarded one at that.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:35 am to dgnx6
quote:
Well except the 1 year old. How does a 1 year old run from Florida to Baton Rouge?
The 1 year old falls in the "custody" group.
The question was about those NOT in the "custody" group, and I said I'd wager most of THEM are not runaways.
Since the 1 year old is in the "custody" group, clearly it would not fall within this potential "runaway" group.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
An argument nobody has made.
You said
quote:
Sexual abuse =/= sex trafficking, and especially the sex trafficking mythology
Now this will turn into another 10 minute argument how you weren't arguing what you said you were arguing.
I'm out. Because you're too much of a pussy to stand on your shitty arguments.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:41 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Sexual abuse =/= sex trafficking, and especially the sex trafficking mythology
Yes they are 2 different things. You do realize that, right?
Sex trafficking involves abuse but requires more. Now the definition keeps changing, but a commercial element is almost always required.
So, to break this down for 85-IQ types
All sex trafficking involves sexual abuse
Not all sexual abuse is sex trafficking. When a karate instructor sexually abuses his student, for example, this is sexual abuse that is not sex trafficking.
*ETA: I literally explained this in even more detail in the post but I guess the words were too big?
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 7:43 am
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:45 am to SlowFlowPro
I can remember when having kids when attempting to cross the Border was a ticket to ride. Seems I remember something like ‘rent a kid’ for that purpose, service being offered by the Cartels. Further, once over the Border, those kids are $$$. I think a lot of this is books that don’t add up as Republicans put on the squeeze for legitimacy. Same with the voting rolls.
Dem Party is Socialist. Well over a hundred million people were killed in the Socialism v. Capitalism wars of the last century. And it was all based on morality. As such, “All is fair in love and war”. It’s on.
Dem Party is Socialist. Well over a hundred million people were killed in the Socialism v. Capitalism wars of the last century. And it was all based on morality. As such, “All is fair in love and war”. It’s on.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:47 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
I can remember when having kids when attempting to cross the Border was a ticket to ride. Seems I remember something like ‘rent a kid’ for that purpose, service being offered by the Cartels. Further, once over the Border, those kids are $$$. I think a lot of this is books that don’t add up as Republicans put on the squeeze for legitimacy. Same with the voting rolls.
Dem Party is Socialist. Well over a hundred million people were killed in the Socialism v. Capitalism wars of the last century. And it was all based on morality. As such, “All is fair in love and war”. It’s on.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Happy Christmas, SF. Another great year glued to this Earth and observing this wondrous Creation.
Hassling you is lagniappe. Ha. Be well Brother.
Hassling you is lagniappe. Ha. Be well Brother.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 7:54 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
I can remember …
Posted on 12/21/25 at 8:09 am to RelentlessAnalysis
I don’t yell at clouds, RA, but I do spend a considerable amount of time enjoying them. Me and my great granddaughter used to lay in the field and find all manner of animals and things coming and going. Guaranteed it will be some of her most cherished childhood memories.
Careful if you meet me driving on the road 50% chance I’m looking at clouds.
Happy Christmas RA.
Careful if you meet me driving on the road 50% chance I’m looking at clouds.
Happy Christmas RA.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 1 year old falls in the "custody" group. The question was about those NOT in the "custody" group, and I said I'd wager most of THEM are not runaways. Since the 1 year old is in the "custody" group, clearly it would not fall within this potential "runaway" group.
Negative. No mention of custody with the 1 year old in Baton Rouge. That was a different 1 year old.
You can’t admit you are just wrong.
The kids varied in age from 1-17. I’m sure they were in all different precarious situations. Including sex abuse.
Just because you ran away doesn’t mean you can’t be a victim of sexual abuse.
And if you are a runaway uner 18 and get into prostitution, by definition that’s sex trafficking.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 8:22 am to Stonehenge
quote:
Most idiotic post ever.
quote:
Stonehenge
hit a nerve bring talked about and called out specifically, huh? Prove him wrong, and dissect where his post is wrong if you think it's "the most idiotic pot ever".
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News