- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Don Jr. publicly outs the "whistleblower"
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:15 am
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:15 am
LINK
We've been told for years that these two are not this same thing.
This could get interesting.
And BTW, any bastard that attempts to have a President removed from office does not get the luxury of remaining anonymous.
quote:
President Donald Trump's son published on Wednesday the name of the alleged anonymous whistleblower whose complaint fired the impeachment inquiry against Trump, breaking strict conventions for protecting officials who reveal wrongdoing in government. Amid calls by the president himself to expose the whistleblower, Donald Trump Jr. tweeted the name of a CIA analyst which has circulated online for weeks, and linked to a Breitbart news article implying the person was pro-Democrat and anti-Trump.
quote:
Donald Trump's son published
quote:
Donald Trump Jr. tweeted
We've been told for years that these two are not this same thing.
This could get interesting.
And BTW, any bastard that attempts to have a President removed from office does not get the luxury of remaining anonymous.
16
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:15 am to bamarep
Good.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:16 am to bamarep
He has been doing interviews lately because of the release of his book. He is one sharp guy.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:17 am to bamarep
So who is it?
ETA: This is actually smart by Don Jr. Now, R's can say, "Don Jr. has said that _______ is the whistle blower." The name can get out there without anyone "breaking the news."
ETA: This is actually smart by Don Jr. Now, R's can say, "Don Jr. has said that _______ is the whistle blower." The name can get out there without anyone "breaking the news."
This post was edited on 11/6/19 at 11:21 am
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:17 am to bamarep
This is dumb. It has been in public domain for weeks in various articles
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:18 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
It only proves that the MSM has been burying the guy's identity.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:19 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is dumb.
It's insane really.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:19 am to CoachChappy
quote:
So who is it?
The Adam Schiff coached Eric Ciaramella.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:19 am to bamarep
Ciaramella's ID has been the worst kept secret in DC since folks started talking openly about Mifsud being handled directly by Brennan.
Anybody who loses their minds over this "development" needs a new hobby.
Anybody who loses their minds over this "development" needs a new hobby.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:28 am to bamarep
quote:
Don Jr. publicly outs the "whistleblower"
Inpeach Don Jr!
Seriously its gonna be hilarious to watch Dems freak the frick out and try to put Jr. through some sort of phony legal trouble that doesn't actually exist. He's a private citizen who tweeted something that's public knowledge. Good luck.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:31 am to SSpaniel
quote:
The Adam Schiff coached Eric Ciaramella.
Both need to be on a Republican subpoena list.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:32 am to bamarep
quote:
any bastard that attempts to have a President removed from office does not get the luxury of remaining anonymous.
frick, you’re stupid
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:33 am to DEG
quote:
frick, you’re stupid
Why, exactly?
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:36 am to DEG
quote:
quote:
any bastard that attempts to have a President removed from office does not get the luxury of remaining anonymous.
frick, you’re stupid
Explain to us what's different if his identity is revealed.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:36 am to DEG
Because you would have been totally on board with a former Sarah Palin employee anonymously making charges against fricknutz Obama and then only allowed to be questioned by Republican leaders in Congress.
You would have been all in on that right?
You would have been all in on that right?
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:36 am to bamarep
Should have just called him "Charley" = the same Charley that Strzok identified as one of their 'agents' inside the WH.
I cannot verify this allegation - I relied on what I thought was a reliable source and someone questioned me on it.
I have been unable to verify this on my own.
Sorry - it is never my intent to mislead.
I cannot verify this allegation - I relied on what I thought was a reliable source and someone questioned me on it.
I have been unable to verify this on my own.
Sorry - it is never my intent to mislead.
This post was edited on 11/6/19 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:36 am to bamarep
Good. Shining a light on roaches tends to make them scatter about
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:37 am to bamarep
quote:
does not get the luxury of remaining anonymous.
Except for those pesky laws and such.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:37 am to SSpaniel
Because there are very good reasons to safeguard a whistleblowers anonymity. One of which is that we need whistleblowers. We need people to shine light on problems that the public doesn’t see.
Be pissed at Congress for not vetting the accusations properly. But don’t blame the whistleblower for wanting to keep his identity private. That’s just dangerous and stupid.
Be pissed at Congress for not vetting the accusations properly. But don’t blame the whistleblower for wanting to keep his identity private. That’s just dangerous and stupid.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 11:39 am to DEG
Then why did Obama arrest all 6 people that were "whistleblowers" against him?
Page 1 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News