- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ sues Alabama for purging non citizens on voter rolls
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:17 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Update: I'm still correct and it's illegal for non-citizen to vote.
This lawsuit doesn't change that fact or argue non-citizens can legally vote
And when they do vote......there will be no standing, its too late to file, or what difference does it make, any of the three, am I right?
1
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:20 am to sabanisarustedspoke
They are arguing that its against the voter registration act to remove people from the rolls within 90 days of voting.
But some states (I believe AZ )have same day registration,
Well aint that convenient....
But some states (I believe AZ )have same day registration,
Well aint that convenient....
Posted on 9/29/24 at 6:24 am to sabanisarustedspoke
The feds will argue the illegals get a noncitizen id number so they can file taxes with the IRS........and part of that process is to register them to vote.
Well if you set this up to make migrants, who obviously arent citizens, pay taxes, then you know they arent citizens, so why would you put it in the process to register them to vote??? We all know why. And someone in "the administration buried in the bureaucracy somewhere came up with this and it will be like a ganglion cyst trying to get it removed.
Well if you set this up to make migrants, who obviously arent citizens, pay taxes, then you know they arent citizens, so why would you put it in the process to register them to vote??? We all know why. And someone in "the administration buried in the bureaucracy somewhere came up with this and it will be like a ganglion cyst trying to get it removed.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 7:15 am to BobBoucher
quote:
This is a tacit admission by the DOJ that illigals DO in fact vote.
You think they were letting all that scum in the country just for shits and giggles? That was their #1 goal to bring them in, give them money, and get their vote. It is sickening, and for the people on here that support that, I hope one of those illegals comes to pay a visit to your wife and/or daughter.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 7:17 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I'm not naive
Yes...yes you are
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:00 am to John Barron
Remember when the Biden administration sued Texas because Texas was defending their border when the Federal government failed to do so? Same thing here, huh?
Joe Biden, "Cackles" Harris & all the crazy arse Democrats are hellbent to destroy our country.
Rember to vote for Republicans at any election. We must rid ourselves of the vermin!
Joe Biden, "Cackles" Harris & all the crazy arse Democrats are hellbent to destroy our country.
Rember to vote for Republicans at any election. We must rid ourselves of the vermin!
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm still correct and it's illegal for non-citizen to vote.
Then why are they allowed to register and why would a lawsuit to keep them on the rolls even be considered? Let’s run this rabbit to the end instead of focusing on you making sure you maintain your precious supposed intellectual superiority.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Update: I'm still correct and it's illegal for non-citizen to vote.
It's illegal to speed on the interstate, but because the opportunity is there (most vehicles can attain speed in excess of the posted speed limit and there are no cops around apparently willing to enforce it), guess what happens?
quote:
This lawsuit doesn't change that fact or argue non-citizens can legally vote
It absolutely seeks to create an environment where it can happen. It's the equivalent of the DOT filing a lawsuit to prevent Alabama State Police from taking action against people with fraudulent driver's licenses.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:22 am to MemphisGuy
quote:
I'm still correct
SFP = equal parts supercilious asshat and disingenuous troll.
What tremendous entertainment he provides the board!
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:24 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
And when they do vote......there will be no standing
That's not necessarily true.
There won't be standing for lots of people (like all lawsuits), but there will be standing for the proper parties.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:25 am to udtiger
quote:
It's illegal to speed on the interstate, but because the opportunity is there (most vehicles can attain speed in excess of the posted speed limit and there are no cops around apparently willing to enforce it), guess what happens?
I understand. He brought up something completely irrelevant to this thread. I agree.
That was the point of my post, to display the non-responsiveness and irrelevance of his comments to this particular thread.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:25 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
and disingenuous troll.
How is being right being a troll? That is a weird way to describe that scenario.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 8:26 am
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:27 am to John Barron
These people cheat, lie, manipulate and spread propaganda and don't care who knows it's all bullsheet.
Our political system has become a freaking joke
Our political system has become a freaking joke
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
Who are the proper parties?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:29 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I'm not naive enough to believe DOJ is beyond behaving fricky. I just need to know more. The devil is in the details
Here are the details…Dems win:
“By any means necessary.”
Posted on 9/29/24 at 8:31 am to Reagan80
quote:
Who are the proper parties?
That depends on the basis of the lawsuit at issue and the parties themselves (a state can't sue another state for allegations about the defendant-state's alleged voting issues, for instance).
All 50 states have specific codes for challenging election results.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 8:31 am
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
weird
Always on message!
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
So no one really has standing to challenge an illegal alien voting in an election? Are election officials the only ones or can a poll watcher? Or is it that no one can have standing?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:55 am to Reagan80
Why do y'all keep engaging with this asshat?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 9:59 am to udtiger
quote:
It absolutely seeks to create an environment where it can happen.
Exactly.
And contrary to SFP’s comments quoted by Fester above, the primary purpose of this lawsuit by the DOJ is to erode the distinction between legal citizens and illegal immigrants.
Yet we now will enter that part of the thread where SFP will 1.) either start his crawfish dance or 2.) flat-out deny he said what he said.
All the while, he will imply we are too dull to consider his finely tuned arguments!
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 10:13 am
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News