- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:18 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. He thinks he's being clever.
Hypocrisy is funny, typically.
Like how you freak out about people are "just asking questions" in your threads
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:20 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Anons Knew
quote:Try it is maddening for those watching this for 30 plus years; and know that the Clinton's will not ever be arrested or even shamed, because they have no shame.
It's maddening for those of us who have been at the wheel for 8 years on the matter
Are you not seeing that the DOJ is sending documents to Congress?
The DOJ obviously can't act on righteous criminal charges-about any of it-or they would.
So this is a shame op that will be called partisan blah blah blah.
By the time congress releases anything no one will read it ...Or WJC will be in the middle of a long State funeral and no one will want to stain the political dynasty.
Possibly congress will blather on about a Church Commission type hearing that was promised---again, that never pans out.
Rogan is bitching with a Tucker clip about Blondi saying children were raped and crickets. So this will be like Epstein-Nothing but Rs yelling like Jim Jordon and D's protecting Clinton's.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:24 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Are you not seeing that the DOJ is sending documents to Congress?
The DOJ obviously can't act on righteous criminal charges-about any of it-or they would.
So this is a shame op that will be called partisan blah blah blah.
By the time congress releases anything no one will read it ...Or WJC will be in the middle of a long State funeral and no one will want to stain the political dynasty.
Possibly congress will blather on about a Church Commission type hearing that was promised---again, that never pans out.
Correct
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:31 am to VoxDawg
Forgot to post this with my last post.
Rogan in general is supportive of Trump in his posts but JE and Blondi ain't going away. I think they should move on- CIA - it's over. But in defense of Trump and company: the only way it could all come out is if the CIA was dismantled.
How do you dismantle the CIA?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Rogan in general is supportive of Trump in his posts but JE and Blondi ain't going away. I think they should move on- CIA - it's over. But in defense of Trump and company: the only way it could all come out is if the CIA was dismantled.
How do you dismantle the CIA?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:34 am to Decatur
quote:
Republicans pretending to care about corruption again. Precious.
MAGA doesn't really care fraudulent foundations.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
So if I take 463513 divided by 21 (years) divided by 365 (days in a years) or 463513 divided by 7665 to get 60 am I wrong? I mean, I did not account for leap years, your time while in court working or when shutdown by this board so, please, forgive me.
If I had those unaccounted numbers I do believe I could provide more accuracy. How about a little help?
If I had those unaccounted numbers I do believe I could provide more accuracy. How about a little help?
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:06 am to cajunangelle
quote:
How do you dismantle the CIA?
JFK was the last POTUS who tried.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:10 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Anones knew
You mean what Rush Limbaugh had been saying for 30 years, on air, before Q existed?
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 11:11 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:20 am to VoxDawg
I voted for Clinton.
And if they have broken the law, prosecute them.
See how easy that was?
Those who voted for the current President should be able to say the same thing.
And if they have broken the law, prosecute them.
See how easy that was?
Those who voted for the current President should be able to say the same thing.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:21 am to VoxDawg
Guess what?
Nothing will happen.
Again.
Nothing will happen.
Again.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:39 pm to VoxDawg
I don't quite get the reason the GOP, which has so many other issues to deal with right now, want to spend time and energy on something that happened in 2013-2015 or about 12 years ago.
Meanwhile we have stuff like this going on - why not go attack racism in American companies taking place as of now! Today!
LINK
Seems like personal vendetta's and grudges matter more to the Department of Justice than actual discrimination and other problems.
Meanwhile we have stuff like this going on - why not go attack racism in American companies taking place as of now! Today!
LINK
Seems like personal vendetta's and grudges matter more to the Department of Justice than actual discrimination and other problems.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:41 pm to VoxDawg
Why send to congress. They are the DOJ. Doesn't the buck stop with them
Kash and Pam are beyond worthless. Merrick Garland had people in jail by now
Q was a fake larp and anyone who ever believed it was real needs to have their heads examined
Kash and Pam are beyond worthless. Merrick Garland had people in jail by now
Q was a fake larp and anyone who ever believed it was real needs to have their heads examined
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:42 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Forgot to post this with my last post.
Don't you see. Epstein acted alone on behalf of no one and trafficked kids to no one. If you don't believe this narrative you are a panican.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:42 pm to Eurocat
quote:
I don't quite get the reason the GOP, which has so many other issues to deal with right now, want to spend time and energy on something that happened in 2013-2015 or about 12 years ago.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:50 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
the Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors
MuH hAnNiTy
"THIS IS NOT THE EVERYDAY FBI AGENTS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE!"
fricking buffoon.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:53 pm to VoxDawg
Why was this info sent to congress?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:54 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Seems like personal vendetta's and grudges matter more to the Department of Justice than actual discrimination and other problems.
Holding people to account for crimes they've committed and to this point have gotten away with is imperative to the respect for the rule of law in our republic.
Hillary Clinton alone is the poster child of everyone who wants to wail, gnash their teeth, tear their clothes and heap ashes on their heads that "No one will ever be held accountable". We can't help that it's taken this long for the spotlight to come back around but we can avoid being a bunch of whiny bitches now that it's here again.
You can have unacceptable results (no prosecutions) on an acceptable timeline, or you can have desired results on a less than desirable timeline.
Can't have both, and I'm willing to wait for the latter.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:54 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Why was this info sent to congress?
Our DOJ is now acting with the logic of Qtards
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:55 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Why was this info sent to congress?
Excellent question, and to my knowledge, one we don't have an answer to at this point.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News