- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:47 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think TDA should be ablet o be labeled a terrorist organization
SympathizerFP
at least you are consistent. I will give you that.
2
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:48 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security
Why does the son-of-a-bitch need this information? Who ends up with it if he gets it?
The thing that pisses me off the most is that John Robers is aligned with this idiot. And to think, one of the self-proclaimed "geniuses" here scoffed at my use of the term 'Political Establishment' the other day.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:48 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
It's great that the DOJ is standing firm on its Constitutional authority and not doing lawfare bullshite we've seen the last 4 years from the Biden DOJ!
As far as this horrible excuse for a judge being able to see sensitive national security information, he should not be allowed anywhere near it!! He's obviously unqualified, corrupt, and his only compass is whatever suits his political ideas, he cares nothing about this nation nor its Constitution.
As far as this horrible excuse for a judge being able to see sensitive national security information, he should not be allowed anywhere near it!! He's obviously unqualified, corrupt, and his only compass is whatever suits his political ideas, he cares nothing about this nation nor its Constitution.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:48 am to DawgCountry
Can't the President classify or de-classify anything at any time?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:49 am to KCT
quote:
The thing that pisses me off the most is that John Robers is aligned with this idiot
He's more than aligned with Boasberg, they were willful participants in the illegal FISA search warrants and the Russia collusion frickery. They are partners in crime.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why can't the judge just go to flightaware.com and get the information like the rest of us?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Oh, look. It's the same self-proclaimed "genius" who laughed at my use of the term 'Political Establishment' a couple of days ago.
You're a fricking idiot. I would be in favor of them releasing one of these thugs on the provision that they moved next door to you.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:53 am to ProjectP2294
"Democracy Forward" -a hyper partisan think tank, and the ACLU's filings demanded detailed military movements/info on national security.
They are concerned over these thug terrorists rights. The Judge nor these orgs have jurisdiction to order a military plane to turn around so they can discover these terrorists have no rights.
Think tanks usurping the President via a crooked leftist Judge.
Judge Boasberg allowed this with his power of a court order.
It is ludicrous.
ETA: Democracy Forward takes donations and advertises to DISRUPT.
They are concerned over these thug terrorists rights. The Judge nor these orgs have jurisdiction to order a military plane to turn around so they can discover these terrorists have no rights.
Think tanks usurping the President via a crooked leftist Judge.
Judge Boasberg allowed this with his power of a court order.
It is ludicrous.
ETA: Democracy Forward takes donations and advertises to DISRUPT.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 10:02 am
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:54 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
feel entitled
This right here pretty much sums it up... no valid reason for his actions and only intent is to throw a road block up because he doesn't like who we elected President...
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:55 am to DawgCountry
quote:
SympathizerFP
No, but your strawman is noted.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:56 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
Genuine question: Why would this lower level judge feel entitled to sensitive national security information? I
He's not.
He's just trying to stop Trump.
He knows he has no authority here.
quote:
what are any legitimate reasons she should feel entitled to that information?
He knows he doesn't have any.
quote:
have a feeling I know what illegitimate reasons she has.
It all comes down to OMB. They hate the orange man.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:00 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
He's more than aligned with Boasberg, they were willful participants in the illegal FISA search warrants and the Russia collusion frickery. They are partners in crime.
Can they indict and arrest a Supreme Court Justice? Looks to me like Roberts is about to be officially exposed.
And they can round up ACB, too. Something has corrupted her, too.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:00 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
Genuine question: Why would this lower level judge feel entitled to sensitive national security information? I guess I should say, what are any legitimate reasons she should feel entitled to that information? I have a feeling I know what illegitimate reasons she has.
So the judge can share this with Soros and Rice so they can keep suing and delaying Trump.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:01 am to KCT
quote:
Can they indict and arrest a Supreme Court Justice?
I mean they can, but not for making a ruling you disagree with.
quote:
Looks to me like Roberts is about to be officially exposed.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:03 am to FourThinInches
quote:
So the judge can share this with Soros and Rice so they can keep suing and delaying Trump.
No. It's a combination of ensuring the admin complied with the order and for reasons discussed in this article:
The Feds' Legal Arguments for These Deportations Are Laughably Weak
quote:
In some cases, those individuals were deported simply for being in the same car or house as other suspects. In others, a Trump administration official admits that there is little specific evidence tying some deportees to any crime—and then, incredibly, argues that the lack of evidence should be taken as proof of criminality.
"The lack of a criminal record does not indicate they pose a limited threat," wrote Robert L. Cerna, an acting field office director for ICE, in a sworn affidavit filed in federal district court in Washington, D.C., on Monday night. Cerna goes on to write that "the lack of specific information about each individual actually highlights the risk they pose. It demonstrates that they are terrorists with regard to whom we lack a complete profile."
That's a laughably weak argument. Cerna is arguing that the Trump administration has the power to deport any immigrant suspected of having ties to the Tren de Aragua gang, even if the evidence is thin and never proven in any court.
Imagine siting on a jury and being told by the prosecution that there would be no evidence presented of any crimes being committed, but that you should simply take the prosecutors' word that the suspect seems like a bad guy. Any reasonable juror would vote to acquit—if the judge didn't laugh the prosecutors out of court first.
If the admin is permitted to hide behind "national security", there is no avenue to review if the people seized are even associated with TDA
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:05 am to LChama
quote:
Mandatory recusal based on evidence of past violations by this judge. He cannot be trusted
At the very least!
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They aren't terrorists and the facts don't support invocation of the AEA.
You should go seek some out and have a Latte and Avacado toast with them.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:15 am to The Maj
Judge Boasberg thinks this group and the ACLU can question matters of national security, and order via the crooked Judge military planes full of terrorists --that cut people apart standing and eat your heart,-- then burn the remains alive as kicks-- to turn around...
Because they say so, they may have rights...
This is not only a weak argument; but the President has already designated by rightful powers, the gang members as terrorists.
So these snot nosed puny, activist lawyers- want to usurp a President.
Because they say so, they may have rights...
This is not only a weak argument; but the President has already designated by rightful powers, the gang members as terrorists.
So these snot nosed puny, activist lawyers- want to usurp a President.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:16 am to SippyCup
quote:
You should go seek some out and have a Latte and Avacado toast with them.
Why? They can be terrible, evil people and violent criminals without being terrorists. Don't you agree?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:20 am to udtiger
And appointed by Roberts. So any help from Roberts is a fantasy that motherfricker
Page 2 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News