Started By
Message

re: DOGE finds no payments were ever disapproved in the entire careers of those in charge

Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:52 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:52 am to
quote:

That’s fine. Elon is probably not the person to do this because of his conflicts.


Is Elon really doing it? He isn’t. It’s just the bogeyman that retards like you had to invent to make chasing government waste and fraud a bad thing.

Also, this is very different than your post to which I responded to which pretended Treasury had every dollar explicitly appropriated by Congress.

quote:

If they start turning off payments that ARE explicitly appropriated then we have an immediate constitutional crisis


It’s not immediately a crisis. That’s just another loaded word to demonize chasing waste and fraud. It is a constitutional question.

Elon is, like most billionaires, an “autistic” megalomaniac. I don’t worship him. But I bet he isn’t doing 10% of what the press is pretending he’s doing.

Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3407 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:53 am to
They likely did not want to give DOGE access to their audits because the probably never did any audits. Their mindset was very likely that an audit did not matter because they were sending payments out that others "approved". Just like the Pentagon and all of federal govt, CONGRESS has failed the people. CONGRESS failed to do its job if holding the bureaucrats accountable.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Is Elon really doing it?


I mean he is down there running the show so yeah

quote:

you had to invent to make chasing government waste and fraud a bad thing.


And i would say you’re using “cutting waste” as cover for things of questionable legality.

quote:

It’s not immediately a crisis.


If that were to happen, and that’s a big if i will concede, the it absolutely would be an immediate constitutional crisis. Hand waving away the clear separating of powers and SCOTUS precedent is bizarre. Again if you want to overturn Train then go to SCOTUS
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:00 am to
quote:

And i would say you’re using “cutting waste” as cover for things of questionable legality.


Y’all love to sue. Sue.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

If that were to happen, and that’s a big if i will concede, the it absolutely would be an immediate constitutional crisis.


It would depend on what it was. Don’t get all female on me. If Elon went to people’s mailbox and stole their SNAP check, that would be a constitutional crisis. If more checks were instituted to verify people’s eligibility for snap, that would not be a crisis. Even though you would pretend it was.
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
14902 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

He lives modestly in a $690K 1,302 SqFt Townhouse in Falls Church Va. His wife teaches English at Thomas Jefferson High School.


Hell of a cover. This guy will be living on a yacht off the Riviera next year with his girlfriend.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:13 am to
quote:

If Elon went to people’s mailbox and stole their SNAP check, that would be a constitutional crisis. If more checks were instituted to verify people’s eligibility for snap, that would not be a crisis.


it would somewhat depend on the specific circumstances. i’m willing to wait and see.

quote:

Don’t get all female on me.


caring about the constitution is female?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Who pays THAT much for a house THAT size???
Someone responsible for oversight of Trillions in taxpayer-funded disbursements, of course.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:28 am to
You don’t “care about the Constitution.”
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:29 am to
quote:

You don’t “care about the Constitution.”


Explain, be specific please.
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
3480 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

That was my thought as well. But it doesn't seem to be the case. He lives modestly in a $690K 1,302 SqFt Townhouse in Falls Church Va. His wife teaches English at Thomas Jefferson High School.


But now that he resisted and is trying to cover up he will now be handed the Democratic Loyalty honor of a $5M book deal or a Professorship, with tenor, at an Ivy League school of his choice. That is how they pay back loyalists.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Explain, be specific please.


You’re appealing to the Constitution because of your ideology.

Was Biden extending the eviction moratorium a Constitutional Crisis?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:40 am to
quote:

You’re appealing to the Constitution because of your ideology.


We may not agree on everything but my “ideology” is not what you think it is. I’m trying to have a good faith conversation with you. If you’re not interested in that then tell me now.

quote:

Was Biden extending the eviction moratorium a Constitutional Crisis?


This is more akin to the birthright citizenship EO, which is going through the proper channels right now.

Surely you can see the difference between those two actions and what we’re talking about here.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Surely you can see the difference between those two actions and what we’re talking about here.


Of course I can see the difference. Biden’s moratorium directly flouted the Constitution. This is whining about looking at records.

Added for clarity: extension of the moratorium.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 9:44 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Surely you can see the difference between those two actions and what we’re talking about here.
Delineate it for those of us who don't know what you're talking about. Are you intimating DOGE or Musk have a direct hand in policy implementation?
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46369 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:49 am to
That’s what I want DOGE to do. Sounds like they are off to a great start.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 9:49 am to
right no different than the birthright EO is directly at odds with the plain text of the constitution.

both of those are going through the proper channels though and aren’t some tech bro with a shitload if conflict of interests camping out and taking over the payment systems.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 10:04 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Are you intimating DOGE or Musk have a direct hand in policy implementation?


Musk and Doge are camped out at OMB and Treasury and are injecting themselves into what has been non partisan sort of boring payment systems where it’s just the people who put the button based on what the appropriations bill says. Aside from the huge conflict of interests there’s also the question of clearance (witness protection payments, for example) for doge not to mention they can now simply turn off the payments for things appropriated by Congress if they choose. While that hasn’t happened yet as far as we know, it’s a questionable move at best and deserving of scrutiny.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 10:16 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128849 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:35 am to
quote:

with the plain text of the constitution


Pretending to have an open discussion and then lying and begging questions is typical for you. frick off.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Pretending to have an open discussion and then lying and begging questions is typical for you. frick off.


amazing some of you want to wipe your arse with the parts of the constitution you don’t like

then you claim to have some kind of moral superiority over liberals who do the same.
This post was edited on 2/1/25 at 10:38 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram