Started By
Message

re: Doesn't it strike you as awfully coincidental? (Science vs Religious Belief)

Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:32 am to
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7827 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Do you find it coincidental that some of the greatest scientist to ever live historically were believers?


No. Science cannot disprove the existence of God.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28149 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:33 am to
Science isn't really about proving things right, but about proving things are wrong until you eliminate all other reasonable choices. Assumed science has been wrong a lot so I'm a skeptic of most things people say because the world is not that simple. And people who want to simplify things into absolutes do so for laziness.
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7827 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:35 am to
quote:

2- the more science evolves, the more it confirms the Bible


Really? Confirms the bible or your interpretation of the bible?

How has science affirmed the literal parting of the Red Sea?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62492 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:35 am to
A lot of stereotyping and bigotry in that OP. Congrats on arguing against a caricature.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73794 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Because people who don't believe in evolution are extremely stupid and deserve to be ridiculed.


Maybe some folks don't trust people they don't know or have never met to make up their minds for them?

I'm not one but I do understand SOME of these folks and its not stupidity.
Posted by lsusaintsfan4life
Member since Mar 2008
947 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:38 am to
What I find striking is the narcissism of man to think that all can be scientifically proven? If you don't see Gods work in the creation of the complexities of a child's hand then I don't know what to tell you. Hopefully God will show you at some point in life.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38538 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Do you have anything you can link for this?


Buddy, if you are REALLY SERIOUS about understanding the Principles behind Science and Religion...then you need to read "The Holographic Universe". Footnoted out the wazoo. Period.

There may be more timely books out there since it was written around '90...but it is definitive. I think everybody in the Science Community just backed off, until more evidence comes in. Quite ironic, given that they CHOOSE to discount the proven evidence they've got. I suspect they realize that their own (subjective) observation, will shape any evidence. Dog chases tail.

Good luck friend.
Posted by wilfont
Gulfport, MS on a Jet Ski
Member since Apr 2007
14860 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:38 am to
I believe in a creator but I also believe in evolution. Suppose that makes be both an heretic and stupid.

At least by the standards of the denizens of the poli board when describing people who disagree with them.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11764 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:39 am to
I think you are confusing people's distrust for government, politicians and lifelong bureaucrats for distrust of science.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170457 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:


I would suspect there are many people in this world with IQ's that dwarf your own who believe in a creator.



Sure. But they probably don't deny evolution. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23650 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:39 am to
I find it funny that anti-religious people ignore the fact the most sceintific discoveries were made by religious people.

quote:

Flat-earth was the same thing.
Do you realize it was a religious person and the church who funded the exploration to disprove flat earth once and for all?

Big Bang theory? A Catholic priest - ridiculed at the time because the "scientific" community at the time claimed he was trying to inject God ("let there be light") into the debate. BOOM

Evolution? - Ever heard of Mendel's genetic discoveries? Don't look now!

There are 35 craters on the moon named after Jesuits - you know why?

Oh and by the way. Where do you think the University system responsible for so many discoveries came from? Yep, Catholic churches.

Ever hear: "Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth." - Pope John Paul II
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 10:53 am
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7827 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

A lot of stereotyping and bigotry in that OP. Congrats on arguing against a caricature.


E.g. Im offended by math, statistics, and a reasoned post because of my religious bias.
Posted by Boom Angry
Member since Jan 2013
1306 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Do you find it coincidental that some of the greatest scientist to ever live historically were believers?


Examples? Anyone pre-Darwin doesn't count.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11764 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Im offended by math, statistics, and a reasoned post because of my religious bias.


I'm offended by bureaucrats, politicians and government. I am offended by your messengers of "science".
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
61998 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:47 am to
quote:

No. Science cannot disprove the existence of God.



That's not what I meant. You seem to imply that science and religion are incompatible And I'm telling you that at one time, scientists were almost exclusively believers.
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 10:56 am
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28149 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

they probably don't deny evolution


What is your belief in evolution based on vs their denial? Do you believe in evolution becuase you've studied it and examined the relavent alternatives or is it just more convenient?
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11764 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

What is your belief in evolution based on vs their denial? Do you believe in evolution becuase you've studied it and examined the relavent alternatives or is it just more convenient?


Most of the elites' beliefs are what everyone is saying on the Cocktail Circuit.
Posted by wilfont
Gulfport, MS on a Jet Ski
Member since Apr 2007
14860 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Examples? Anyone pre-Darwin doesn't count.

Albert Einstein didn't profess a belief in a personal God but he did truly belive all that he observed came from a creator.

quote:

"I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details."


quote:

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."


Albert was sorta smart.
Posted by pilgrim
Member since Dec 2013
31 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:50 am to
Maybe OP should have defined "science" and "religious."
quote:

the product of science
Many inventors claim their inspiration came from God. Is op saying God couldn't have possibly given the ideas of these products of science?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
61998 posts
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:51 am to
quote:

How has science affirmed the literal parting of the Red Sea?



Why would a God that created all things and would certainly understand scientific principles better that you, need to use a method of parting the Red Sea that is understandable or explainable to modern scientists? Is it possible that he used a technique that hasn't even been discovered yet?
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram