Started By
Message

re: Does IVF create abortions?

Posted on 2/19/25 at 12:55 pm to
Posted by Harper
Member since Dec 2003
109 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 12:55 pm to
There is a test for DS before implanting an embryo. It’s called preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. It’s been available since 1990. Do some homework before you start with opinions about procedures you obviously know nothing about.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
41012 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 12:55 pm to
My body was all for getting pregnant and letting it implant. It’s just that after implantation my body declared war and proceeded to attack with extreme prejudice.
Posted by Stitches
Member since Oct 2019
1194 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 12:56 pm to
I edited my original post since I can see how such a vague statement could have been misconstrued.
Posted by Mariner
Mandeville, LA
Member since Jul 2009
2318 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:00 pm to
You can't destroy an embryo in Louisiana.

You either have to use it, keep it stored for future generations, or donate it.

Its a touchy subject with people. Some see it as immoral while others are celebrating the creation of life from it. It's hard for couples to want babies but have no success while trying. Others met their spouse later in life (40's) and are considered high risk so its better and safer to do IVF.

I know a few people who did IVF. They are very loving and nurturing people.

If you are against people who have abortions, should you also be against someone who is trying to create life to love and nurture?

Posted by GetMeOutOfHere
Member since Aug 2018
896 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:03 pm to
This reeks of holier-than-thou.
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
533 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:07 pm to
yes that's why it's not allowed by catholic church
Posted by Aguga
Member since Aug 2021
3172 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Alot of IVF procedures involve implanting multiple embryos, hoping one attaches. This necessitates the need to abort the other embryos.


Not as much anymore. Genetic testing allows for 1 embryo to be placed at a time. This is much more common today.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33115 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

What test would you run on the embryo to determine that?

I assume the same genetic testing that they already run to screen for DS and other defects in ordinary pregnancies.
This post was edited on 2/19/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted by Hodag
Northwoods
Member since Sep 2024
1083 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:19 pm to


You ChurchTards have been relentless with your concern troll threads since election day.

Is there a list serve or chain email that hits your inbox each day with the latest faux outrage? Or is there an active Churchard/True Conservative Community on BlueSky?
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
5904 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:23 pm to
I'll give my opinion since my wife and I had to make this decision. We had tried several times with artificial insemination and the next step was IVF. Dr tells us that several vital embryos could be created a few could be implanted at a time in hopes of 1 taking then there would be several in the freezer to try again or donate or whatever.

Let me say, that I will not judge anybody's decision. It is their decision. But for me, it just felt way too much like playing God and I just didn't feel right with embryos being destroyed or just left in the freezer till whenever. I just felt uneasy about it. My wife and I decided not to do it. It was very tough and difficult. We ended up adopting a baby girl and then 4 yrs later adopted another baby girl. I think about what might have happened to my daughters had we decided to go IVF.
I wouldn't have it any other way. They are the absolute joy of our lives. God blessed us with 2 wonderful girls, but God blessed them with loving parents that care for them like nobody else could.
So for me as a Christian who believes a life is created at conception, it just felt like we were forcing something and trying to play God for our own selfish reason or wanting our own flesh and blood. But in reality maybe God had us not conceive and have issues because these 2 little girls were what God had for us. That's just me and what we felt.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
5904 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:27 pm to
Pettitfogger, that is amazing. So awesome.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
5207 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

We need to address the reality of why IVF is increasingly part of the conversation for traditional families


Some have pointed to a correlation with the use of seed oil and some pesticides causing infertility.
Posted by Foch
Member since Feb 2015
804 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Abortion is a clear intent to end a life. Where as IVF is trying to start a life.


Your thoughts on the below (philosophical question):

Doesn't modern medecine hazard the destruction of life or mangling of life when it chooses to pursue the creation of life via this method?

Put another way, if I am choosing a method which knowingly risks the destruction of embryos or mangling of embryos either during artificially fostered conception or during storage or during artificially assisted implantation, do I not have some conscious/positive action on my part which resulted in harm or death to embryos (human life)?

Do we have reasonable certainty that IVF procedures do not "as a amateur of course" adversely affect embryos? Why then are embryos periodically thawed, checked, and either discarded or refrozen?

This is a charged issue and infertility is an obstacle and condition I pray for science to remedy without our current methods.

I see IVF as an unfortunate example where "might" (the ability of science to attempt to replicate/replace the natural) and desire make for "right".

We know in our gut that freezing and thawing genetic material such as produce and food stuffs leads to lower quality in a culinary setting...do we not have any reason the pause when we think of doing this with embryos?
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83326 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

You ChurchTards have been relentless with your concern troll threads since election day.


If you want us to let you stay you'll need to be a little less antagonistic
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38006 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:46 pm to
It's interesting that the relatively moderate folks who are non-Christian would possibly look at AI and see possible danger in the future...

But not look at IVF and see the future potential for just growing humans without humans and the moral implications of that.

There is no doubt that IVF creates abortions...

And no doubt that it possibly leads in some very dangerous and morally complex directions that I don't think we want as a human race.

BUT the ends justify the means to some.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83326 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Pettitfogger, that is amazing. So awesome.


Thank you, it was a quite a ride.

"What exactly do you think 'wait on the Lord' means, idiot?" - God, probably
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
3356 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:47 pm to
It’s an abortion if you are a complete retard virtue signaler
Posted by Foch
Member since Feb 2015
804 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Some have pointed to a correlation with the use of seed oil and some pesticides causing infertility.


Add also the following:

-long term affects of synthetic hormones which are not tailored/compounded to account for women's genetics (see birth control)

-women waiting until after natural windows of peak fertility to begin attempting conception (often paired with long term contraceptive hormone use)

-poor education concerning women's hormonal cycles because modern medicine has taken a "master the cycle" approach instead of "understand the cycle"...lack of understanding around ovulation timing and at home testing methods for it is thankfully dissipating in recent years due to a growing rejection of oral contraceptives (they are not healthy)

-aging populations of men who themselves may not be in peak fertility windows (we are still way behind on understanding conditions for peak semen quality)

-women fully engaged in workforce = stress, which =/= optimized fertility environment

-other environmentals (increased sedentary lifestyles/workplaces, decreased exercise/exposure to sun, unknown role of microplastics as endocrine disruptors, impact of porn and other testosterone inhibitors which affect the male half of the equation)
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
8222 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Yes - as do other types of external fertilization techniques.

I think IVF is unethical, immoral, and sinful.


This is the correct answer.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
41225 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 1:48 pm to
Both my kids are IVF babies. My advice to folks considering going that route is to make sure your marriage or relationship is structurally strong as it is easily the toughest thing I’ve been through and could easily break a relationship that isn’t strong. The emotional toll of that journey was unlike anything I ever expected when we started out on that path. I would never do it again but am extremely thankful for the opportunity to raise my two kids from that process.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram