Started By
Message

re: Do you have a Constitutional right to kick people off of your property?

Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

EDIT: fricking Bernie, the Godfather of this horseshite has multiple vacation homes as a result of private proceeds.

Capitalists homie...they're capitalists inside.


Lol. You think the commies in control don't like nice shite? You need to read some deep serious history.
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Lol. You think the commies in control don't like nice shite? You need to read some deep serious history.

I didn't say that.

What I did say is that even our progressive, woke, leftists market their own labor. That's not disputable and, by definition, perfectly capitalist.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

What I did say is that even our progressive, woke, leftists market their own labor. That's not disputable and, by definition, perfectly capitalist.


Oh, so banning people you don't agree with from the market is now considered capitalism?

That explains your definition of the proper role of government and how you think a a government has resources.
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Oh, so banning people you don't agree with from the market is now considered capitalism?

Yeah, I didn't say that either. To the contrary, I cited specific examples of people generating revenue as a result of their free labor.
quote:

That explains your definition of the proper role of government and how you think a a government has resources.

What was my definition of the proper role of government?
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

What was my definition of the proper role of government?


You said a government has a right to protect its resources. Where did it get that right? Who gave it that right? Is it spelled out in the constitution? Or just made up by the government and Supreme court?
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

You said a government has a right to protect its resources. Where did it get that right? Who gave it that right? Is it spelled out in the constitution? Or just made up by the government and Supreme court?

It probably stemmed from some jackass hillbilly dumping mule shite into the Potomac River. And because a lot of other people needed that water to be clean and safe someone had to step in correct that action.

Most laws probably center around some citizen being an a-hole to other citizens.

Again, this isn't a utopian world. Sometimes people do horrible shite and need to be straightened out. Who's supposed to do that?
This post was edited on 3/19/21 at 4:24 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21594 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

I remember a thread not two days ago, in which the majority of this forum was arguing that a landowner did NOT have a right to control access to his property.


The thread in question had an 11% upvote ratio.

But yea, majority.

Were you a mail in voter counter in 2020? Would explain a lot.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
15476 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:34 pm to
In TEXAS you do.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Who's supposed to do that?


Me.

Until the government makes it against the law.
This post was edited on 3/19/21 at 4:38 pm
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Court?
Awesome. And courts are an embodiment of _____________ ?
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:41 pm to
(no message)
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

quote:
Court?
Awesome. And courts are an embodiment of _____________ ?


Woooo boy. Enjoy your miss post.
This post was edited on 3/19/21 at 4:43 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Azkiger
That is cool, the way you linked only the JJDoc OP with none of the subsequent posts listed. JJDoc always gets downvoted.

More Posts
"Sue the cop" - 2:1 upvote ratio
"Assault" - unanimous upvotes
"Cop was wrong to arrest" - unanimous upvotes
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Woooo boy. Enjoy your miss post.

Oh, you edited "Court" out of your reply.

How disingenuous of you.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

, you edited "Court" out of your reply.

How disingenuous of you.



Yes I did because it wasn't meant for this post
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Yes I did because it wasn't meant for this post



Right.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

How disingenuous of you.


If you want to beat me up on that instead of the issue go right ahead.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5573 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

I was involved with the definitive (at the time) "Takings" case, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council which also went before SCOTUS.


Thoughts on this?

I don’t think the state has the right to force me to have people in my property

Obviously I have not read up on this and a question comes up on personal vs business use property that may or may not have been addressed
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21594 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

AggieHank86


That is cool, the way you linked the posts that backed your position and none of the other posts.

"Fake News. She was arrested for 1)trespassing 2) resisting arrest." 2:1 upvote ratio
"Cop said it was for intruding on premises." Unanimous upvotes.
"The private business asked her to comply with THEIR mask requirement." another 2:1 upvote ratio.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68636 posts
Posted on 3/19/21 at 5:28 pm to
I think the deal is having posted no trespassing signs. Then yes, yes you do. Because it's then reasonable that the trespasser shouldn't have trespassed.

Now that doesn't mean you can just kill them.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram