- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:05 pm to gsvar2004
Democrats will run it up as fast as they can so no it doesn’t bother me . Republicans should run it up for the things we want .
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:06 pm to gsvar2004
Voters should begin by learning the difference between debt and deficits.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:08 pm to roadGator
quote:
How long would a reset take?
If the US defaulted in its debt, it would cause the largest depression in human history.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:13 pm to gsvar2004
Only caring about that money machine going brrrrrr
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:16 pm to Antonio Moss
Agreed. So it would take a while
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:17 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
Do voters really care about the deficit?
With everything that has happened so far in 2020? Not at the moment
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:21 pm to roadGator
quote:
Agreed. So it would take a while
Imagine almost every 401K in the US depreciating substantially overnight.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:29 pm to funnystuff
quote:This is bullshite. The crowding out theory depends on govt demand for lent funds to cause an increase in interest rates in the economy which leads to "crowded out" investment. Are you actually arguing interest rates are artificially high right now due to the government?
Every dollar of national debt crowds out 30 cents of private investment.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:30 pm to gsvar2004
I legitimately used to, but it’s gotten so out of hand I don’t really know what to do and have gotten numb
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:30 pm to funnystuff
quote:a)we haven't "given up $10T of PI and b)China likely has an even more extreme debt problem than we do - on top of not having a reserve currency they are also likely cooking the books covid-style to hide shite
And when you give up 10 trillion dollars worth of private investment, China passes you up
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:31 pm to gsvar2004
I for one don’t give shite. A debt is not worth much if you can’t physically take the money
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:31 pm to Big Scrub TX
Why do you decide to make sense sometimes?
Posted on 7/7/20 at 7:33 pm to OBReb6
quote:I'm right on nearly ever topic discussed on this board. What exactly do you think I'm so "non-sensical" about?
Why do you decide to make sense sometimes?
Posted on 7/7/20 at 8:18 pm to Big Scrub TX
Yes, we have given up 10 trillion dollars of private investment. At least. Opportunity costs are a real thing. And our best estimate is that we crowd out 30 cents of private investment for every dollar of deficit we run. Meaning we gave up well over 10 trillion dollars of private investment by running our persistent budget deficits, because that number only accounts for the currently remaining debt, not the total debt incurred. The total hit to private investment over the last 40 years of unconstrained spending is actually far higher.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 8:32 pm to Big Scrub TX
No, it doesn’t rely on high government bond interest rates. That certainly exacerbates the problem, but crowding out still exists without it.
Consider GM wanting to build a $300 million factory. To do that, they plan to issue $300 million in corporate bonds. They have their buyers lined up and ready to purchase these soon-to-be-released bonds. Then the government makes $300 million in new bonds available to finance a budget deficit. Government bonds are safer than GM bonds, hands down. Even with the lower interest rates on government bonds, the risk averse investors are fine with that lower rate of return in order to buy the safer government bond. So let’s say half of those investors switch over to the government option. Meaning GM needs to find another $150 million of investment to make up the new shortfall. In order to do that, they potentially have to raise the interest rate they offer on their corporate bonds.
So even with government bonds maintaining exceptionally low interest rates, it still impacts corporate bond interest rates. And if those raise enough, GM might find that the $300 million dollar investment is no longer worth the cost. And again, the strongest empirical estimate that I’ve seen calculates that we lose 30 cents of private investment for every dollar of government debt through this mechanism. Now there’s certainly room for inaccuracy there, since it’s a difficult calculation to disentangle. But arguing that the crowding out effect itself is of non-concern just doesn’t have theoretical backing. Even when government interest rates are low.
Consider GM wanting to build a $300 million factory. To do that, they plan to issue $300 million in corporate bonds. They have their buyers lined up and ready to purchase these soon-to-be-released bonds. Then the government makes $300 million in new bonds available to finance a budget deficit. Government bonds are safer than GM bonds, hands down. Even with the lower interest rates on government bonds, the risk averse investors are fine with that lower rate of return in order to buy the safer government bond. So let’s say half of those investors switch over to the government option. Meaning GM needs to find another $150 million of investment to make up the new shortfall. In order to do that, they potentially have to raise the interest rate they offer on their corporate bonds.
So even with government bonds maintaining exceptionally low interest rates, it still impacts corporate bond interest rates. And if those raise enough, GM might find that the $300 million dollar investment is no longer worth the cost. And again, the strongest empirical estimate that I’ve seen calculates that we lose 30 cents of private investment for every dollar of government debt through this mechanism. Now there’s certainly room for inaccuracy there, since it’s a difficult calculation to disentangle. But arguing that the crowding out effect itself is of non-concern just doesn’t have theoretical backing. Even when government interest rates are low.
This post was edited on 7/7/20 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 7/7/20 at 8:37 pm to gsvar2004
Those of us who do know that the politicians won’t do a thing about it anyway.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 8:55 pm to gthog61
quote:
Why would a politician commit political suicide by bringing it up?
Maybe you should ask the guy who said it would be very easy to eliminate it in 8 years...
Posted on 7/7/20 at 8:56 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Every dollar of national debt crowds out 30 cents of private investment
Link? I’d like to read this study.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 9:00 pm to gsvar2004
There’s really no need to worry about the deficit. We are the bank and we are monetarily independent, and don’t owe any country this debt. Honestly we should be “printing” more money to stimulate the economy. As long as the economy can absorb the money, no need to worry about inflation. If you are the bank, why care if you’re in debt to yourself?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News