- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Do not dismiss AOC
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:29 pm
The other day I posted a reminder that Scott Adams early on spotted Trump's natural power of persuasion and predicted that he could be POTUS.
Scott was a hypnotist and could spot persuasive skill and ability. His prediction was based on persuasion alone and had nothing to do with policy.
Scott also said that AOC seems to have the same type of natural ability. Forget about policy here and focus on on skill.
Well, Scott is not alone in this observation, others have noticed.
Scott was a hypnotist and could spot persuasive skill and ability. His prediction was based on persuasion alone and had nothing to do with policy.
Scott also said that AOC seems to have the same type of natural ability. Forget about policy here and focus on on skill.
Well, Scott is not alone in this observation, others have noticed.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
If you still think AOC is low-IQ and has no shot, you have no idea what you’re watching.
She’s above average intelligence and highly skilled.
The only proof I need is the clip where she casually drops “Woke 1 was crazy.”
Watch it below and I’ll walk you through why this is so perfect.
First-notice how she never engaged the host’s actual question--whether “woke” went too far. That's a losing frame, so she refused to touch it.
Instead, she immediately created distance from it. She pulled viewers out of the present and relocated them back to the COVID era. She also stacked contextual reminders of what that era felt like: high crime and unemployment, the open Overton window, everyone searching for solutions.
Once the viewers were fully transported there, she anchored “Woke 1” to that specific time and left it there.
Then she returned everyone to the present and spoke about Woke 1 as if it were a closed chapter from long ago that no longer belongs to her nor her team.
In Neuro Linguistic Programming (think conversational hypnosis), this is called Timeline Therapy (or temporal anchoring). You take a charged concept (Woke 1 in this case), place it on a specific point in the past, and release it there so it no longer sticks to the present.
What you just watched was her performing a clean version of Timeline Therapy in real time. She did this on the fly. She brought you, me, and “Woke 1” back to 2020, pinned it there, and walked away with clean hands.
The branding of “Woke 1” itself is also brilliant. Calling it version 1 implies it's a rough draft. Everyone already associates rough drafts with something messy, imperfect, and needing improvement. The rough draft is supposed to be flawed--it helps for a better final product.
By branding it as the rough draft, she turned the entire ideology into an early stage of a big project.
I could go on for another 10 paragraphs. But I think that's all you're ready for. She has completely stole the spotlight over the past few days.
She's brilliant and the nomination is probably hers if she wants it. She's that skilled.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:32 pm to TrueTiger
AOC and Kamala, combined, cant run a profitable lemonade stand!
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:33 pm to TrueTiger
She's got great handlers, and? By the way, where is Jose Silva? Oh wait, he's dead.
quote:
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a pseudoscientific[1][2] approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy that first appeared in Richard Bandler and John Grinder's book The Structure of Magic I (1975).
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:35 pm to TrueTiger
Loved the casual mention of the Overton Window for us nerds out there
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:35 pm to TrueTiger
TLDR, Democrats’ “present stance” matters when they’re running for office, not what they said 4-5 years ago.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:35 pm to TrueTiger
The American public is dumb. However they're not in a coma.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:35 pm to boosiebadazz
She seems more polished lately. That 2028 run is coming.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:36 pm to TrueTiger
While I have no doubt she'll launch a bid at some point, I think the debates would wreck her.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:38 pm to TrueTiger
I dismiss AOC easily. Any person with a shred of common sense/wisdom understands that she is not a serious candidate. She doesn't possess the ability to articulate whatever views, thoughts, or opinions she has or has to read off a prompter.
Either Vance or Rubio would humiliate her in a debate. Absolutely reduce her to less than retard status. Lol
Regardless of how pissed or disappointed some Trump voters might be, the idea they could make the jump between America First ideas to WHATEVER fricked off commie ideas AOC attempts to present just isn't a possibility.
So..... maybe YOU won't dismiss AOC, but I fricking laugh at your ignorance!
Either Vance or Rubio would humiliate her in a debate. Absolutely reduce her to less than retard status. Lol
Regardless of how pissed or disappointed some Trump voters might be, the idea they could make the jump between America First ideas to WHATEVER fricked off commie ideas AOC attempts to present just isn't a possibility.
So..... maybe YOU won't dismiss AOC, but I fricking laugh at your ignorance!
This post was edited on 8/13/26 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:38 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
I think the debates would wreck her.
I think so, against a skilled opponent.
But if the GOP went with a McCain or Romney type, she could hold her own.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:38 pm to NIH
Hell yeah she’s running. I still don’t think she has the gravitas to be trusted with the nuclear codes and handle foreign policy enough to actually win, but she’s going to run anyway.
This post was edited on 8/13/26 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:41 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
While I have no doubt she'll launch a bid at some point, I think the debates would wreck her.
That’s the first thing that crosses my mind whenever they talk about her running for President. No matter who the Republican candidate is, Rubio or Vance, either one is gonna make a few baws here happy because they will proverbially “undress” her in front of a national TV audience.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:41 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
But if the GOP went with a McCain or Romney type, she could hold her own
But they won't!! Why would they?? Both Vance and Rubio can run circles around ANYONE the Marxist Dems put up.
This is such an easy and simple topic to discuss... seriously!
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:42 pm to TrueTiger
I don't dismiss her.
I have complete confidence in the retardation of the left.
I have complete confidence in the retardation of the left.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:43 pm to TrueTiger
See how that went for MIT grad Thomas Massie and a guy who didn’t campaign. AOC is a joke and it’s a bigger joke she may be the dem nominee.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:43 pm to boosiebadazz
I think we’re going to see a 2016 primary on the left. I don’t see a path for white guys like Beshear or Gav.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:45 pm to NIH
Just wait for that primary. It will be fun to watch them destroy each other. JB pritzker will also be in it and drop a shite ton of money.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:46 pm to lake chuck fan
I'm not worried about you or me or even most MAGA types.
We can't forget that Dems start near the 50 yard line on every possession.
We can't forget that Dems start near the 50 yard line on every possession.
Popular
Back to top


30









