Started By
Message

DNI Pulte Removes 51 from Agency

Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:34 am
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10949 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:34 am
Didn’t see this posted on the first couple pages, so adding it here.

And now the stalemate begins …. several Democrats have said they will not support reauthorizing Section 702 while Pulte remains acting DNI.
I’ll bet Mark Warmer is melting right now …..


quote:

Acting DNI Pulte Removes 51 from Agency – Six Fired and 45 “sent back to their home agencies”

June 23, 2026 | Sundance

CBS is reporting on events within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. As CTH previously outlined, Acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte is following a very predictable path. {GO DEEP}

The part of the CBS report that tells the story is: “Six career and political intelligence staff were terminated and 45 were sent back to their home agencies, according to three sources familiar with the personnel moves.” …

“One source characterized the cuts as thoughtful and methodical. No staffers have been removed from the counterterrorism group.” So, who was removed? Well, I’m certainly not the Nostradamus of USIC, but if I were to hazard an educated guess it looks like the National Intelligence Council – Directorate of Analysis, just lost six political staff, and 45 people from the various liaison desks were ‘sent back to their home agencies.’

As we noted last year, Tulsi Gabbard took the National Intelligence Council (NIC) out of the CIA – fired the heads, then putting the assembly back under the control of the ODNI. However, highly political operatives within the former CIA-controlled Directorate of Analysis (the former home of Eric Ciarmella) were still problematic.

It looks like Director Pulte just eliminated the remaining DoA rats.


LINK

This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 5:59 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69215 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:41 am to
Oh no, FISA won’t get renewed. What ever will we do?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168965 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:49 am to


The cuts follow hundreds of staff reductions last year by former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who stepped down last week. Last year’s planned downsizing sought to bring the office’s headcount from 2,000 to around 1,300.

President Trump has pushed for further cuts, directing Pulte to “execute the immediate and needed downsizing of the office” in a Truth Social post earlier this month.

Meanwhile in related news: “This sets up a stalemate as several Democrats have said they will not support reauthorizing Section 702 while Pulte remains Trump’s acting DNI pick.”


This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 5:52 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168965 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 5:58 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 6:16 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116047 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:02 am to
Well this is some wonderful news with which to start the day!
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10949 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:10 am to
Radcliffe doin’ work too …. 1200 employee purge.

I voted for smaller federal government, so it would please me if this continues….

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 6:13 am
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103240 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:13 am to
Draining the swamp finally
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168965 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:15 am to
That is a nice surprise...

Sorry about my video above it was for another thread.
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
10204 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:23 am to
With the predictable push-back from Swamp Rat enthusiasts.

We get a little more and more of a glimpse of how truly entitled these people are hiding behind their tired refrain of “protecting and preserving democracy!!”
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168965 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:27 am to
Amazing..

quote:

The Purge: What He's Actually Done

Mass Firings & Buyouts

•February 2025: Ratcliffe extended the government-wide deferred resignation buyout program to the entire CIA workforce — the first time any intelligence agency had done this. The pitch was blunt: take the deal and walk, or get on board with the new mission.

•51 DEI-related officers were targeted for termination. A judge temporarily paused the firings of 19 who sued, but a Virginia district judge ultimately ruled Ratcliffe has "sweeping statutory authority" to fire CIA employees at will.

•Probationary employees (those with less than two years at the agency) were systematically reviewed and many were cut. They were summoned to off-site locations, stripped of security credentials, and shown the door. The agency's own statement on this was cold as ice: "Our officers face unique pressures from working in situations that are fast-paced and high-stakes — it's not for everyone."

•Overall headcount reduction: The plan is to shrink the CIA by roughly 1,200 positions over Trump's term, partly through early retirements (several hundred took the deal), partly through reduced hiring, and partly through straight firings.

The DEI Purge

This was arguably the most controversial piece. Officers who'd been rotated into diversity, equity, and inclusion roles — some with 18 years in, just short of their pensions — got axed. Their attorney argued they were just "regular American intelligence officers" doing temporary DEI assignments. Ratcliffe didn't care. The DEI apparatus was seen as a political infection, and he cut it out.

The Bias Report Scandal (2026)

This one's especially revealing. Ratcliffe ordered a review of roughly 300 intelligence reports from the past decade. The President's Intelligence Advisory Board found 19 reports so politically compromised they violated basic tradecraft standards under Intelligence Community Directive 203. Of those:

•17 were permanently deleted
•2 were pulled, revised, and reissued

The reports spanned the tenures of John Brennan, Gina Haspel, and William Burns — and none of those directors had ever rescinded a batch of reports over bias. Ratcliffe's CIA official put it plainly: "There is absolutely no room for bias in any kind of the CIA's work."

If 19 out of 300 were bad enough to delete, what's lurking in the thousands that haven't been reviewed yet?

Why This Matters

This isn't typical bureaucratic reshuffling. Ratcliffe is systematically dismantling what he and Gabbard have openly called the "well-documented politicization" and "weaponization" of the intelligence community. Gabbard has sent criminal referrals for illegal leaks, revoked 67 security clearances, and has 11 more leak investigations underway.

The pearl-clutching from the old guard is exactly what you'd expect. CNN ran breathless pieces about how fired agents might sell secrets to China or Russia. Ratcliffe's response was savage: "You're telling me that a professional setback could cause people to risk the consequences of treason... and your argument is that those are the kind of people who should stay inside CIA?"

The deeper question — and Ratcliffe clearly gets this — is whether an intelligence agency that spent years running DEI programs, producing politically slanted analysis, and leaking against a sitting president was ever really serving the American people in the first place. You don't reform a captured institution with gentle memos and lateral transfers. You clean house.

Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
4057 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:29 am to
51? That’s a pretty coincidental number..

I seem to remember that number of intelligence officers sometime around 2020 doing something shady.

Something about a laptop maybe…
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168965 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:32 am to
Who was it, Brennan --that bragged recently about those within govt will stop Trump?

We can pray Brennan's back door in has been closed.
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
14104 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:41 am to
quote:

Oh no, FISA won’t get renewed. 
And it shouldn't be. Patriot Act on steroids.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
168965 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:42 am to
Dems are concerned with a nastygram letter..

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24216 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:42 am to
If Tillis is bitching about this, we know Pulte is doing exactly what needs to be done.
Using Pultr is a great strategy. He knows he won't be confirmed so Trump is using Pulte as acting DNI to make these cuts and absorv the outrage and criticism so whomever is next comes in clean.
Posted by captainFid
Never apologize to barbarism
Member since Dec 2014
10875 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:45 am to
quote:

Well this is some wonderful news with which to start the day!

Amen
Posted by Onyx Aggie
Foothills of the Smokies
Member since Sep 2012
3074 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Oh no, FISA won’t get renewed. What ever will we do?
Right, don't threaten me with a good time. That shite needs to be relegated to the trash bin of history.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32217 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:47 am to
“Dont weaponize intel”?


Yeah, how about go frick yourself. They do what they do because it’s in secret. Expose these seditious criminals.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50621 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 6:57 am to
quote:

DNI Pulte Removes 51 from Agency


Pulte is the real deal. That's not only why the Dems are afraid of him, but it's also why the little Boy Scout Mike Johnson went to the White House to ask President Trump to rescind his nomination of Pulte to be the permanent head of DNI.

I was glad to hear that the White House said that meeting "didn't go well."

Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16913 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:28 am to
Maybe there's a reason they paused with 51.

It seems like that's a recent news worthy number.

51 former US intelligence officials?

Is that it?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram