- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJT on Slotkin/Mark Kelly video - Seditious behavior from traitors. Lock them up???
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Im going to link this even though I know you dont truly care.
YT
"This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community officials against American citizens"
"The threats to our constitution arent just coming from abroad, but from right here at home".
YT
"This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community officials against American citizens"
"The threats to our constitution arent just coming from abroad, but from right here at home".
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:42 am to Houag80
quote:
They are claiming Trump gave illegal orders.
They are not doing this. That's the strawman from which you're replying.
They gave a general statement that reflects lawful behavior.
quote:
It is illegal to foment sedition, which this is.
How can following the law ever be sedition?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:42 am to Harry Boutte
Wrong, the Slotkin cvnt claimed Trump has issued illegal orders.
This bitch needs to be sitting in a cell or naming the illegal orders.
You "lawyers" defending this are the epitome of bleeding pussies.
This bitch needs to be sitting in a cell or naming the illegal orders.
You "lawyers" defending this are the epitome of bleeding pussies.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:When I took the oath, it was " that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
How can following the law ever be sedition?
Not that I would follow the orders that I agreed with and not follow the ones that I think might be unconstitutional. None of these loser democrats or you (yes, I repeat myself) bothered to tell the troops that they didn't need to follow the order to get the covid jab. As it turned out, the order to take that jab was unconstitutional.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:43 am to Bunk Moreland
I can’t defend Trump’s response here.
But I will say that Kelly/Slotkin’s statement is unnecessary and provocative. Anyone who’s ever served in the military has had it constantly drilled into their heads already: under UCMJ, you have a moral and legal obligation to not carry out plainly illegal orders.
But I will say that Kelly/Slotkin’s statement is unnecessary and provocative. Anyone who’s ever served in the military has had it constantly drilled into their heads already: under UCMJ, you have a moral and legal obligation to not carry out plainly illegal orders.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:43 am to Vacherie Saint
Excellent, they should give examples or be sitting in cells.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You're a libtard thru and thru.
wut
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:43 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
"This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community officials against American citizens"
"The threats to our constitution arent just coming from abroad, but from right here at home".
OK fair point, but that doesn't address the issue of sedition.
That's not sedition. That's protected language of the 1A. Its merit/veracity can be debated, but that's another unrelated discussion.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:44 am to RollTide4547
quote:
You're a libtard thru and thru.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:44 am to SallysHuman
quote:
This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens.
I agree. And there's no reason to be deploying the national guard to cities - especially in states that don't want them deployed in their cities.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Never served did ya...
RogerTheShrubber
that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Never served did ya...
RogerTheShrubber
that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Name the illegal orders or shut the frick up.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:44 am to Godfather1
quote:
But I will say that Kelly/Slotkin’s statement is unnecessary
Probably, it was to score political points.
But not sedition.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:45 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Never served did ya...
No. but somehow I seem to understand this better than you. Strange.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:At least you didn't deny it.
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:45 am to Houag80
its a stupid argument. The reality is, everything Trump is doing is getting challenged in court by their party, so what are they implying? Who gets to define an unlawful order? Should the military refuse all orders until further advised? This is madness.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:46 am to Houag80
quote:
Wrong, the Slotkin cvnt claimed Trump has issued illegal orders.
Bet if you looked at each of their previous campaigns they probably said their goal was to get Trump.
It’s just more rhetoric from the left since the Epstein thing isn’t going as planned.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:46 am to Houag80
quote:
Name the illegal orders or shut the frick up.

Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:No, you don't.
No. but somehow I seem to understand this better than you.
quote:Yes you are.
Strange.
Popular
Back to top



2



