- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJT on Slotkin/Mark Kelly video - Seditious behavior from traitors. Lock them up???
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:33 am to aTmTexas Dillo
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:33 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Exactly what are you asking?
The question is clear and simple
quote:
How can following the law ever be sedition?
quote:
Are you suggesting without saying, Trump is acting in a manner inconsistent with the Constitution?
For purposes of this discussion, I made no comment on that, as it's not necessary for the discussion.
That will only lead to digressions irrelevant to the discussion debating individual actions of Trump. There is no need to destroy the thread in that manner.
1
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
Please show me the illegal order. I'll wait.
They are ginning up sedition....which is illegal, oh great one.
They are ginning up sedition....which is illegal, oh great one.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 10:36 am
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
I thought you were better than this, but I guess I was wrong. Its cute enough to play these little semantics games or engage in contrarian naval gazing like slofag loves to do 60+ times per day for over 20 years on this forum, but lets not pretend this was just a PSA by dems that soldiers can disobey illegal orders. They dont need to be reminded of that.
The video specifically accuses the president of pitting the military and IC against US citizens and threatending democracy. Those are their words. Then they urge these people to disobey "unlawful" orders in an era where virtually 100% of Trump actions are met with a partisan injunction - legality be damned. This is not acceptible language.
The video specifically accuses the president of pitting the military and IC against US citizens and threatending democracy. Those are their words. Then they urge these people to disobey "unlawful" orders in an era where virtually 100% of Trump actions are met with a partisan injunction - legality be damned. This is not acceptible language.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
You said:
When asked what the illegal orders were, you then said:
So basically, you're talking out of your arse in the usual fashion. Urging military members to not follow the orders of the Commander in Chief is seditious.
quote:
I'll ask the same thing I did in the other thread: How can following the law ever be sedition?
When asked what the illegal orders were, you then said:
quote:
Well, the Democrats didn't specify so it's not really a relevant question. That we're making more general statement so we have to analyze that statement for itself only.
All we can do is analyze exactly what they said and determine whether that is illegal or not. And all that they said was military members do not have to follow illegal orders and their duty is to follow the laws of the country and the Constitution. How can that be Sedition?
So basically, you're talking out of your arse in the usual fashion. Urging military members to not follow the orders of the Commander in Chief is seditious.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:34 am to lsusteve1
quote:
I’ve watched the video and my opinion does not change
If you actually did, you know Trump is lying to you.'
I dont think that bothers you in the least though
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:35 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
So basically, you're talking out of your arse in the usual fashion
No. I'm just preemptively avoiding irrelevant digressions that aren't necessary for the discussion at hand.
quote:
Urging military members to not follow the orders of the Commander in Chief is seditious.
If those orders of the CIC are illegal, then is it sedition? Yes or no
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Posse Comitatus Act
Applies to the Army. Not the National Gaurd
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:35 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Its cute enough to play these little semantics games
Its not semantics. Trump flat out iled to you once again.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:36 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The video specifically accuses the president of pitting the military and IC against US citizens
With what language?
Not implication/interpretation. Actual language.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:36 am to Vacherie Saint
Correct, illegal. Should be prosecuted.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
Thanks for ignoring my entire post. Now I know you arent serious
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:36 am to Houag80
quote:
They are ginning up sedition....which is illegal, oh great one.
quote:
How can following the law ever be sedition?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
Another Dem and twin tard of sfp defending Ds
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:37 am to BBONDS25
quote:
what is the point of the message?
The point of the message is to be on the look out for illegal orders. There is nothing illegal about warning service members to be wary of illegal orders.
There can be absolutely nothing wrong with imploring the military to continue to defend the Constitution. I don't know why you're pretending otherwise, except to troll.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:38 am to DarkDrifter
quote:
Applies to the Army. Not the National Gaurd
quote:
President Donald Trump federalized the California National Guard on June 7 and sent troops to Los Angeles to address what he has described as a city “under siege” by protesters opposed to his immigration policy.
quote:
When the National Guard is federalized, it comes under the jurisdiction of the Posse Comitatus Act,
Say what again?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:38 am to Harry Boutte
quote:
There is nothing illegal about warning service members to be wary of illegal orders.
There can be absolutely nothing wrong with imploring the military to continue to defend the Constitution. I don't know why you're pretending otherwise, except to troll.
It's not that complicated.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:39 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Thanks for ignoring my entire post
Just more justification for believing Trumps lie
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:40 am to SlowFlowPro
They are claiming Trump gave illegal orders. Name them.
It is illegal to foment sedition, which this is.
You know this, yet you choose to be contrarian.
It is illegal to foment sedition, which this is.
You know this, yet you choose to be contrarian.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:40 am to Harry Boutte
quote:
The point of the message is to be on the look out for illegal orders. There is nothing illegal about warning service members to be wary of illegal orders.
Which was made clear in the video none of them watched.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:40 am to Houag80
quote:
They are claiming Trump gave illegal orders.
Link?
Page 7 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News