Started By
Message

re: DJT: Iran Uranium Dust Must Be 'Brought HOME'

Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:13 am to
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
27798 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:13 am to
Remember when we didn’t have folks trying to decipher what our President was actually saying?

I miss those days
This post was edited on 5/26/26 at 1:14 am
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
1809 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:49 am to
quote:

And even if it did, they would just mine more


More?

They haven't mined any.

You're a special kind of stupid.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20526 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 4:35 am to
quote:

anyone member who was on the cfius board that approved this shite?

Hilldabeast and Eric Holder


But hils said, I was just one of seven voting members....how was I to know the canadian company was going to resell to Russia? The same canadian company that was THE LARGEST donor to the Clinton Foundation?

What we are referencing is a little known committee CFIUS that is "supposed" to prevent US companies from selling sensitive things to potential enemies.

Keep in mind this same board approved Loral and Hughs Electronics to use chinese rockets to launch sats and somehow "wink wink" china ended up with guidance systems that advanced their missile tech by a decade at least. And that was during, wait for it,.......Bill Clinton's presidency.

So you see, they get a kickback from the chini, then the MIC screams we need to combat our own tech that was stolen.....and they get a kick back from the MIC when they get a bigger budget.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
7155 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 5:16 am to
If Trump isn't willing to fully commit to an invasion, this is all just more stupid, empty words. And if he does fully commit, he's done and so is the GOP. Iran will just need to hold out two years.

Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69671 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 5:37 am to
It’s 2026 and we’re still talking Q nonsense. Sad.
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8819 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 5:41 am to
IMO, a ground conflict to retrieve uranium with Isotopes that indicate US origin is justifiable, as is the punishment to the individuals that allowed said transfer to occur.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:57 am to
quote:

If it weren't originally sourced from our repository, they wouldn't have been fighting us this whole time on analyzing it

Or, you know, Iran wants to keep uranium it can enrich to build nukes down the line.

Why would Iran protect Hillary Clinton?

Retard logic alert.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:57 am to
quote:

There is a solid chance this is the keystone that we've been waiting for.

And when yet another one of your "keystone" examples fails, as they all do, then what?

Perhaps we'll start a meme: VoxDawg was wrong, about everything
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116580 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:58 am to
An interesting choice of words
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:00 am to
quote:

IMO, a ground conflict to retrieve uranium with Isotopes that indicate US origin is justifiable


Theoretically justifiable but still eternally stupid
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99325 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:03 am to
You would vote Dem if Orange put boots on the ground?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:06 am to
He didn't say that, but he understands a lot of the moderates and more centric Republican voters won't support a ground invasion. The moderates will largely flip back (which we've seen the last 3 Presidential elections) and the non-die hard Republicans may not vote or may go like libertarian.

This war isn't popular now and we're doing relatively OK

A ground invasion would be disastrous for national support. Nobody wants another Iraq/Afghanistan that we can't win
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99325 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:10 am to
So both you dorks think "boots on thr ground" equals a Dem landslide win?

You think the country would flip to Gav or AOC?

Lets get you on record so we can get the SFP is wrong about everything shirts printed early

We can add that clown AUcom69 to it as well
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:17 am to
quote:

So both you dorks think "boots on thr ground" equals a Dem landslide win?


I did not even say that

I was just correcting your dishonest histrionics specifically in response to his post

quote:

You think the country would flip to Gav or AOC?

No matter who runs it will be relatively close

2024 was a combination of things all hurting the DEMs because a lot of stuff was going wrong and they were the party that was just in power. Add in some unpopular social policies and it was a disaster. As the incumbent party the GOP will have to avoid that mine field in 2028.

A recession+ ground war in Iran will lead to a huge DEM win in 2028.

quote:

the SFP is wrong

More dishonest histrionics
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99325 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:19 am to
Yeah I figured
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Yeah I figured


Giving a reasoned, intelligent response? Yea you should have figured
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99325 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Giving a reasoned, intelligent response?


You just did your typical rant of nothing. I figured you were scared to go on record
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481014 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:34 am to
Only an idiot would make a political prediction for 2 years form now based on one single variable. A legit retard.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99325 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:37 am to
Yout buddy just did if boots were on the ground and you backed him up

Yes you are a legit retard and everyone knows that. I mean you admit to voting for Kanye (which we know just meant JB)
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3956 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Abraham Accords

It’s funny to me that this pact is named after a mythical character- a non-historical person.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram