re: Did Trump lie about Operation Midnight Hammer?

Solid melt:

quote:

---

Bruh you have a serious obsession with Orange bad plus your TDS is next level And never forget you loved Ron more than retardgator. You loved Aipac supporting ron along with Miriam Yet now you are the biggest joo hating clown You also loved masshole whose top donor was Jewish and he was supporter by the squads Qatar Pac

---

It’s a legitimate question for a serious discussion. Slinging this out there without context is going to bring snarky replies.

Here’s the context:

1) News of military operations and the success thereof must always be closely guarded for national security reasons. It should be expected that the public and therefore enemy won’t have all of the details.

2) The American public needs to be able to trust that they are getting enough information to hold its government accountable for its policies.

3) The media has a responsibility to curate this information wisely so as to inform the public without unnecessarily giving out important security sensitive information.

4) The politicization of the media to the far extent that it has gone makes it very difficult to trust that they are not simply enemies of the party in control, or at least so biased against it that they are filled with animus.

5) The Trump administration believes (correctly in my view) that the Democratic Party is dishonest to its core and will press every advantage whether truthful or not, and whether damaging to the country or not. Why, they think, should they operate with full candor when the opposing party feels no need to be honest and also controls the media?

6) The use of specific and defined language to describe the damage of infrastructure has never been applied except in the quiet recesses of military control rooms. To say that a target has been obliterated never has meant that every level of every building has been reduced to rubble.

So, with all of that acknowledged, is it possible that the Trump Administration overstated the amount of damage for political reasons? Yes, its possible.

quote:

---

I literally posted what Trump wrote. That’s facts.

---

Thats wonderful. Im glad you admitted everything I posted was fact about you

You are pathetic

quote:

---

Solid melt:

---

Makes you wonder. If someone is obsessed with calling everyone that criticizes Trump someone that has TDS....it makes you wonder who really has TDS.

His entire identity is based on defending someone he has never met. SDV is the TDS king of the board

What a joke

quote:

---

If this was Kamala Harris leading the charge, the same people applauding this bullshite would be the same people denouncing it. We are in a sad, sad place.

---

1000% agree… as long as it’s “their team”, and this goes for BOTH sides, they will excuse any and everything

TDS is a crippling disorder

It’s pretty straightforward. You either voted for Trump or you supported Kamala. There is no middle ground so it’s pretty clear what your opinions are on Trump yet you somehow believe in your LSD addled mind that Kamala would have somehow been better on immigration, tougher on Iran, and released all the Epstein files. Your opinion on anything is retarded

He wants control of the site to clear out any remnants to make sure that Iran never has a nuclear bomb. He doesn't want to leave them the ability to access a nuclear materials ever and he knows future presidents will appease them.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

here is a good example of trump talk. After a while, how can you believe him.