- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DHS tells Obama judge to frick off. "You don't dictate foreign policy"
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:14 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:14 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
in the specific situations where the IEEP was challenged, the law providing the president the power to issue sanctions is broad and the president has acted lawfully under the statute.
Are you admitting that one of these district courts was either inept or knowingly obstructing POTUS despite he was within his legal rights to do so?
I wonder if that is happening here....curious.
1
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:14 pm to BugAC
quote:
I just laid out every law pertinent to illegal immigration. You read it. The reason you didn't reply to those posts is because you know i'm right and because you suck at playing lawyer.
Again, my argument isn’t that he can’t deport criminals.
It’s that it isn’t an unchallengeable right of the executive branch. The reason every statue you provided talks about notice is so people have time to challenge their removal.
There is nothing in the statute saying that the removals aren’t subject to judicial review, in fact it says the oppositeZ
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:17 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
And if the Admin doesn’t like it they can go to an appeal court and the SCOTUS
If the Judge doesn't like the response of the Executive branch, feel free to do something about it.
Enough BS legal games with illegals. It is a freaking joke.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:17 pm to BugAC
quote:
Are you admitting that one of these district courts was either inept or knowingly obstructing POTUS despite he was within his legal rights to do so? I wonder if that is happening here....curious.
possibly.
district courts are wrong all the time, but that’s doesn’t make their injunction something you can ignore.
now the jurisdiction issue is something else altogether, which is why i prefaced this whole
argument with the “in a court of valid jurisdiction.”
The general idea that District court judges can’t stay a removal within their jurisdiction is just untrue.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:17 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
It’s that it isn’t an unchallengeable right of the executive branch. The reason every statue you provided talks about notice is so people have time to challenge their removal.
Again, i posted the time periods and noted that each criminal was already being imprisoned because of violent felonies. They weren't "surprise deported". You are just fighting for the injustice of pedophiles because it sides with the liberals. Not because you actually have a case here.
AGain, TDS is the ONLY reason you are throwing a fit. No other reason. All of this typing you are doing is just making you look like a slimy POS who values pedophiles, rapists, and murderers over innocent
Americans.
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:21 pm to BugAC
I dont really care about the fact of the case.
I care mostly about the idea that the judicial branch doesn’t have any authority to review executive branch powers.
I care mostly about the idea that the judicial branch doesn’t have any authority to review executive branch powers.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:23 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I care mostly about the idea that the judicial branch doesn’t have any authority to review executive branch powers.
But you don't care about judicial obstruction as long as it favors your side.
Stop pretending you are objective. Everyone on this board and others knows you are very much a leftist. Why are you ashamed of that fact?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:23 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
If they brought a suit in Mass, and were deported from mass, a Mass judge would have full authority to stat or reverse the deportation while legal challenges are heard.
What if they brought a suit in Massachusetts for a person deported from Texas?
Because that’s what happened here.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:26 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
there is a difference between trying to dictate foreign policy and dictating what the US law requires.
If they brought a suit in Mass, and were deported from mass, a Mass judge would have full authority to stat or reverse the deportation while legal challenges are heard.
And if the Admin doesn’t like it they can go to an appeal court and the SCOTUS
The idea that judges don’t have authority over cases being heard in their jurisdiction is asinine.
Hey knucklehead, a local judge does not have jurisdiction of south sudan, nor its citizens, even if george clooney and obama invented the country.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:28 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
they can if it violates the law in their jurisdiction.
Show me the law in MA regarding citizens of south sudan?????????????
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:28 pm to BugAC
quote:
But you don't care about judicial obstruction as long as it favors your side.
I don’t consider what the courts are doing to be judicial obstruction.
File an appeal.
quote:
Again, i posted the time periods and noted that each criminal was already being imprisoned because of violent felonies.
I am definitely left leaning, but I dont care if a convicted pedophile
is deported, because at the end of the day, if it’s lawful it will happen. I more so care that the Trump Administration forcing a constitutional crisis.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:29 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
Show me the law in MA regarding citizens of south sudan?????????????
he’s a federal judge you moron,
also federal immigration laws apply everywhere in the US.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:29 pm to SammyTiger
Didn't BugAC quote the exception clause?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:29 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
where they deported from Mass?
Doesn't matter at all, this is a matter of foreign policy.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:31 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I don’t consider what the courts are doing to be judicial obstruction.
I know. No one is surprised by this.
quote:
I am definitely left leaning, but I dont care if a convicted pedophile
is deported, because at the end of the day, if it’s lawful it will happen. I more so care that the Trump Administration forcing a constitutional crisis.
Again, TDS. You care that the TRUMP administration is forcing a constitutional crisis. Interesing:
1) Obama deported more illegals than Trump has, yet there was no constitutional crisis. In fact, Obama deported illegals faster than Trump has. Your outrage was not present. Why?
2) You think it's POTUS not ONLY liberal district court judges creating the crisis? again, your TDS is showing. Move on, clown.
quote:
I am definitely left leaning,
It makes me happy you are embarrassed by what you are that you can't even admit it. You know how evil lefitsts are and acknowledge it.
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:32 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I dont really care about the fact of the case.
LOL! YOu don't say!
quote:
I care mostly about the idea that the judicial branch doesn’t have any authority to review executive branch powers.
You have been told for pages that this thread is about already convicted illegals. And you were shown that all due process was followed.
And you still fought for the people listed. You went to bat for them claiming they had no due rights given.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:33 pm to BugAC
Sammy, SFP, and Hank are just one guy sitting in his mom’s basement rotating logins
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:33 pm to the808bass
quote:
What if they brought a suit in Massachusetts for a person deported from Texas?
Because that’s what happened here.
He answered that.. Here it is:
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:21 pm to BugAC
I dont really care about the fact of the case.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:36 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I more so care that the Trump Administration forcing a constitutional crisis.
We already have that due to the district courts. You now have Appeal Court judge calling out the SCOTUS.
That's what you wanted and voted for. Lawfare is your game. So here we are!
Let's play.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:36 pm to BugAC
quote:
Again, TDS. You care that the TRUMP administration is forcing a constitutional crisis. Interesing: 1) Obama deported more illegals than Trump has, yet there was no constitutional crisis. In fact, Obama deported illegals faster than Trump has. Your outrage was not present. Why? 2) You think it's POTUS not ONLY liberal district court judges creating the crisis? again, your TDS is showing. Move on, clown.
that’s not what would
cause the constitutional crisis moron.
What happens when the President and executive branch refuses to obey the Judicial branch?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News