Started By
Message

re: DHS Sec. Mullin May Pull CBP from Sanctuary City Airports - No Customs = No Int'l Flights

Posted on 5/29/26 at 5:47 am to
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
33504 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 5:47 am to
He’s not closing anything. These cities have a choice to make. It’s their own doing
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38734 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 5:51 am to
quote:

The claim for this from DHS is "If you aren't going to send officers to support us or help us, then we are going to reroute our own officers from the airports to the facilities to protect our people". Where they say they will take those DHS officers (ICE/CBP) is from the international airports, thus shutting down international travel in and inflicting pain on the city/state.
Well, sounds like their move (Democrats).
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37871 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:20 am to
I'll take brain farts after being kicked in the head while training for MMA, Alex.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32782 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:28 am to
quote:

That Atlanta isn't a designated sanctuary city is mind-blowing to me.


I don’t think the city ever got that far in the weeds on sanctuary policies.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44581 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:28 am to
quote:

As a realist, this is going to hurt the country. So many people will be inconvenienced. So much business could be lost.


So those cities, if wise, would discard their sanctuary status -no?
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85349 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:32 am to
quote:

Well, sounds like their move (Democrats).


No, its stupid bc it will impact everyday people, including those with no ties to the city/state.

Every airport can't accept international flights and a great deal of Americans who travel abroad have to connect out of NJ/NY/CALI/IL where this would be targeted.

If they want to make it hurt the city/state but limit impact to Americans, they should scale down operations and say they are only processing American's returning from abroad. Basically shut down international tourism into those locations.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85349 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:33 am to
quote:

So those cities, if wise, would discard their sanctuary status -no?


No, the leaders don't give a shite about everyday people. Just look at what they did with the shutdowns. They let things burn to the ground and everyday Americans suffer in order to try to get their way.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44581 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:34 am to
quote:

That Atlanta isn't a designated sanctuary city is mind-blowing to me.


Is that an example of black politicians not liking Hispanics?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115917 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:35 am to
May
Might
Could
Considering

Blah blah fricking blah.

shite, or get off the pot.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
8162 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:48 am to
I love it. Only negative I see is all the 3rd world travelers being pushed to good areas, and staying there. I have a buddy in the Dallas area that is adamant a big reason dfw has become new Delhi is because of the direct flights from India to DFW over a decade ago. Creating a direct one way pipeline.

Let's only allow in people who are true tourists and business travelers. If they come in with luggage full of of 3rd world shite wrapped up then send them back.

Anyone that watches the Customs shows know what I'm talking about.
This post was edited on 5/29/26 at 6:49 am
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
8162 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:52 am to
quote:

If they want to make it hurt the city/state but limit impact to Americans, they should scale down operations and say they are only processing American's returning from abroad. Basically shut down international tourism into those locations.
and that might be apart of the "being planned out" process.

This is a big deal no doubt. Lots of scenarios need to be played out. Good to hear the warnings are being put out there, so the cities can prepare either way and can't complain about not being warned.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44581 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:05 am to
quote:

No, the leaders don't give a shite about everyday people. Just look at what they did with the shutdowns. They let things burn to the ground and everyday Americans suffer in order to try to get their way.


So extremist blue cities take it on the chin while our country becomes more secure? I mean, that is their issue. As noted, Atlanta isn’t a sanctuary city.

I say throw down the gauntlet.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
32178 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:09 am to
The cities have now been officially warned, they can govern themselves accordingly. Mullin needs to set an official timeline, a drawdown type schedule.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
78307 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:09 am to
quote:

Is that an example of black politicians not liking Hispanics?

I think it may be that we just aren't far enough down the self-destruction path that other blue cities have gone.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85349 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:13 am to
quote:

while our country becomes more secure?


How does our country become more secure by shutting down customs at certain airports

Newsflash, it doesn't. Its a stunt and will disproportionally impact everyday Americans, which the Dem leadership doesn't give a shite about. They just want to virtue signal.

Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
78307 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:16 am to
quote:

They just want to virtue signal.

While that may be a thing for RINOs, there's no desire for virtue signaling from Team 47.

It'd be mind-blowing what they'd already have accomplished in 16 months if the GOP would quit actively obstructing the President and let him fricking cook.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44581 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:29 am to
quote:

How does our country become more secure by shutting down customs at certain airports


Because those city’s are obstructing law enforcement measures by ICE.

That means criminals are free to go after American citizens.

The Airport is simply a leverage item.

You say that those city’s won’t cave.

I say that we test your boast.

No pain, no gain…
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13430 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:31 am to
Lets see if they have the stones.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150732 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:51 am to
quote:

As a realist, this is going to hurt the country. So many people will be inconvenienced. So much business could be lost.

quote:

this is going to hurt the country
like illegals committing heinous crimes after being released from jails and their information withheld from ICE
quote:

So many people will be inconvenienced. So much business could be lost.
like the large migrant populations completely inundating the housing, schools, emergency rooms, public assistance programs, etc.



Yeah let’s blame DHS for people being inconvenienced and hurting the country

Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38734 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

No, its stupid bc
What's stupid is not funding agencies that are trying to protect "the every day people" and their properties. Illegal immigration is going to drag us further into the doldrums if left unabated. The Ds are being petty. You know the saying by your hero "elections have consequences".
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram