- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DeSantis calls for new Florida police force to go after election crimes
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:01 pm to burger bearcat
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:01 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
I'm hesitant on this. Mostly because I don't trust agencies like this and how they can be corrupted later on. Wish there was more focus on local police in each precinct doing these investigations.
The problem with this is that they then become dependent on local politicians. Milwaukee had a special division of their police force dedicated to election crimes. A Democrat mayor dissolved it.
0
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:02 pm to Eurocat
quote:
French Conservatives
Move there and have fun.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:03 pm to Jbird
Vote harvesting is legal and has been a thing for decades. Mail in ballots made it worse
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:04 pm to Jbird
quote:Cool. Texas will start creating on in about 2 weeks.
DeSantis calls for new Florida police force to go after election crimes
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:04 pm to roadGator
I didn't "run away" from that thread, the board got busy, other threads were more interesting. By the time I got back it was on page eight or more and the Republican was already winning so it didn't seem like an issue any more. Sorry I didn't get your permission to post regarding other topics.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:04 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Would he support it if this office were run by a democrat?
I kinda doubt it.
Right because the. It would be corrupt.
What's your point?
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:06 pm to Turbeauxdog
The point is don't do it for reasons I explained above in what I believe is now the first post in this page of the thread.
Unless it's run by two men (or women) from each party it will be politically tenditious. And look for fraud to justify its existence, as I wrote up top.
Unless it's run by two men (or women) from each party it will be politically tenditious. And look for fraud to justify its existence, as I wrote up top.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:08 pm to Eurocat
quote:
That's what the Democrats did and look where it got them.
Your lack of awareness is pretty remarkable.
What got you and your comrades where they are is people waking up to anti American mouth breathers like you and your terrible policies.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:08 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Vote harvesting is legal
That’s a wildly blanket statement that just isn’t true everywhere.
And just because some forms of what is colloquially referred to as “vote harvesting” is legal, it does not follow that all vote harvesting is legal.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:09 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Vote harvesting is legal
No its not. I cant go turn in 100s of ballots that arent mine.
like with everything, diff states have diff limits.
Some states no one can turn in someone else's ballot, some only a family member.
here is Lousiana
quote:
If delivered by other than the voter, a commercial courier, or the U.S. Postal Service, the registrar shall require that the person making such delivery sign a statement, prepared by the secretary of state, certifying that he has the authorization and consent of the voter to hand deliver the marked ballot. No person except the immediate family of the voter shall hand deliver more than one marked ballot to the registrar.
here is alabama
quote:
No one other than the absentee voter may return their own ballot by mail or hand delivery.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:10 pm to dsides
And they take those policies when they get overconfident which is what I meant by Hubris.
It's as old as History itself. Julius Ceasar did it.
It's as old as History itself. Julius Ceasar did it.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:11 pm to Eurocat
DGAF if you claim you didn’t run. You posted idiocy and left.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:13 pm to roadGator
But it's not idiocy. They were following the rules.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:13 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Would he support it if this office were run by a democrat?
Probably not. And neither would a lot of the posters here because we are all well aware that a Democrat would cheat, lie, and cover up any voter fraud complaints and evidence.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:15 pm to BFIV
And that is my point. It's a cynical thing to do and dangerous long term when you hire the wrong person for the job, a David Souter person like George Bush put on the Supreme Court.
Again, it envisions one boss, it needs two, one from each party.
If it is not done like that it will be seen as the "police force to help the governor win" police (because his person will be in charge).
Again, it envisions one boss, it needs two, one from each party.
If it is not done like that it will be seen as the "police force to help the governor win" police (because his person will be in charge).
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:16 pm to Eurocat
quote:
And they take those policies when they get overconfident which is what I meant by Hubris.
It's as old as History itself. Julius Ceasar did it.
The problem is you are “for” what you are against. The orange man. Without him you have nothing. When it was time to roll out policies you had nothing to offer.
This post was edited on 11/3/21 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:17 pm to Eurocat
quote:
They were following the rules.
They weren’t. And you left the thread because you were demonstrably and factually wrong.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:18 pm to Eurocat
Governments have laws.
If the party in power can make rules then we are fricked.
Blocking people from voting is against the law.
Stay out of Virginia. There enough Commies there already
If the party in power can make rules then we are fricked.
Blocking people from voting is against the law.
Stay out of Virginia. There enough Commies there already
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
Democrats don’t investigate voter fraud.
Sure they do. They just don't ever find any guilty parties.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:19 pm to Eurocat
quote:
though the French Conservatives seem to be getting interesting.
We're not France.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News